Deciphering participation: an interpretive synthesis of its meaning and application in rehabilitation

References

• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:S22–S35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinemann AW, Tulsky D, Dijkers M, et al. Issues in participation measurement in research and clinical applications. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S72–SS6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenze EJ, Munin MC, Quear T, et al. The Pittsburgh Rehabilitation Participation Scale: reliability and validity of a clinician-rated measure of participation in acute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2004;85:380–384.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kortte KB, Falk LD, Castillo RC, et al. The Hopkins Rehabilitation Engagement Rating Scale: development and psychometric properties. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:877–884.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. What does participation mean? An insider perspective from people with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:1445–1460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M. Participation in the occupations of everyday life. Am J Occup Ther. 2002;56:640–649.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M, Dijkers MPJM, Gordor WA, et al. Participation objective, participation subjective – a measure of participation combining outsider and insider perspectives. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2004;19:459–481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Piskur B, Daniels R, Jongmans MJ, et al. Participation and social participation: are they distinct concepts? Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:211–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Babulal GM, Bakhshi P, Kopriva S, et al. Measuring participation for persons with mental illness: a systematic review assessing relevance of existing scales for low and middle income countries. BMC Psychol. 2015;3:36.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Dekker J, et al. A systematic review of instruments assessing participation: challenges in defining participation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:983–997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FA, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williamson L. Patient and citizen participation in health: the need for improved ethical support. Am J Bioethics. 2014;14:4–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers MP. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S5–S16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seekins T, Shunkamolah W, Bertsche M, et al. A systematic scoping review of measures of participation in disability and rehabilitation research: a preliminary report of findings. Disabil Health. 2012;5:224–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Desrosiers J, St-Cyr TD. Comparing the disability creation process and International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health models. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74: Spec No.:233–242.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fougeyrollas P, Noreau L, Bergeron H, et al. Social consequences of long term impairments and disabilities: conceptual approach and assessment of handicap. Int J Rehabil Res. 1998;21:127–141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chang FH, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA. Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:771–781.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Plow MA. Measuring participation as defined by the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: an evaluation of existing measures. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:856–866.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Brakel WH, Anderson AM, Mutatkar RK, et al. The Participation Scale: measuring a key concept in public health. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:193–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health: ICF; 2002 [cited 2016 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/icf/training/icfbeginnersguide.pdf
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization [Internet]. How to use the ICF: a practical manual for using the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Exposure draft for comment; 2013 [cited 2016 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.who.int/classifications/drafticfpracticalmanual2.pdf?ua=1
   Google Scholar
• Badley EM. Enhancing the conceptual clarity of the activity and participation components of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability, and Health. Soc Sci Med. 2008;66:2335–2345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown M. Participation: the insider's perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S34–SS7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baum CM. Fulfilling the promise: supporting participation in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:169–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mallinson T, Hammel J. Measurement of participation: intersecting person, task, and environment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:S29–S33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Client-centred practice in occupational therapy: critical reflections. Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:174–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merriam-Webster [Internet]. 2017 [cited 2017 Apr 04]. Available from: https://www.merriam-webster.com/
   Google Scholar
• Pierce D. Untangling occupation and activity. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:138–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Agarwal S, Jones D, et al. Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods. J Health Serv Res Po. 2005;10:45–53.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Suri H, Clarke D. Advancements in research synthesis methods: from a methodologically inclusive perspective. Rev Educ Res. 2009;79:395–430.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eisenhart M. On the subject of interpretive reviews. Rev Educ Res. 1998;68:391–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Cavers D, Agarwal S, et al. Conducting a critical interpretive synthesis of the literature on access to healthcare by vulnerable groups. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2006;6:35.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dixon-Woods M, Bonas S, Booth A, et al. How can systematic reviews incorporate qualitative research? A critical perspective. Qual Res J. 2006;6:27–44.
   Google Scholar
• Heaton J, Corden A, Parker G. 'Continuity of care': a critical interpretive synthesis of how the concept was elaborated by a national research programme. Int J Integr Care. 2012;e12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weed M. A potential method for the interpretive synthesis of qualitative research: issues in the development of 'meta-interpretation'. Intl J Soc Res Methodol. 2008;11:13–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research and evaluation methods. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications, Inc.; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Suri H. Purposeful sampling in qualitative research synthesis. Qual Res J. 2011;11:63–75.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree JL. On occupational performance. Occup Ther Health Care. 2003;17:1–18.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson DL. Occupation: form and performance. Am J Occup Ther. 1988;42:633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hocking C. The challenge of occupation: describing the things people do. J Occup Sci. 2009;16:140–150.
   Google Scholar
• Reed KD, Hocking C, Smythe LA. The interconnected meanings of occupation: the call, being-with, possibilities. J Occup Sci. 2010;17:140–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reed KD, Hocking CS, Smythe LA. Exploring the meaning of occupation: the case for phenomenology. Can J Occup Ther. 2011;78:303–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doble SE, Caron Santha J. Occupational well-being: rethinking occupational therapy outcomes. Can J Occup Ther. 2008;75:184–190.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Clark FA, Carlson ME, Jackson J, et al. Occupational science: academic innovation in the service of occupational therapy's future. Am J Occup Ther. 1991;45:300–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levasseur M, Richard L, Gauvin L, et al. Inventory and analysis of definitions of social participation found in the aging literature: proposed taxonomy of social activities. Soc Sci Med. 2010;71:2141–2149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson A, Park M, Tham K. Belonging: a qualitative, longitudinal study of what matters for persons after stroke during the one year of rehabilitation. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:831–838.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: an exploration. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:39–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Magasi S, Hammel J, Heinemann A, et al. Participation: a comparative analysis of multiple rehabilitation stakeholders' perspectives. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:936–944.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skidmore ER, Whyte EM, Holm MB, et al. Cognitive and affective predictors of rehabilitation participation after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91:203–207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjellberg A, Kahlin I, Haglund L, et al. The myth of participation in occupational therapy: reconceptualizing a client-centred approach. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19:421–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rettke H, Geschwindner HM, van den Heuvel WJA. Assessment of patient participation in physical rehabilitation activities: an integrative review. Rehabil Nurs. 2015;40:209–223.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Little BR. Personal projects: a rationale and method for investigation. Environ Behav. 1983;15:273–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock A. A theory of the human need for occupation. J Occup Sci. 1993;1:17–24.
   Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJ, de Witte L, Wade D, et al. Social participation through the eyes of people with aphasia. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2010;45:537–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eakman AM, Carlson ME, Clark FA. The Meaningful Activity Participation Assessment: a measure of engagement in personally valued activities. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 2010;70:299–317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fry PS. Religious involvement, spirituality and personal meaning for life: existential predictors of psychological wellbeing in community-residing and institutional care elders. Aging Ment Health. 2000;4:375–387.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lund ML, Nordlund A, Nygard L, et al. Perceptions of participation and predictors of perceived problems with participation in persons with spinal cord injury. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37:3–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beaulieu CL, Dijkers MP, Barrett RS, et al. Occupational, physical, and speech therapy treatment activities during inpatient rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:S222–S234 e17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeJong G, Hsieh CH, Gassaway J, et al. Characterizing rehabilitation services for patients with knee and hip replacement in skilled nursing facilities and inpatient rehabilitation facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1269–1283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozelie R, Sipple C, Foy T, et al. SCIRehab Project series: the occupational therapy taxonomy. J Spinal Cord Med. 2009;32:283–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marszalek J, Price LL, Harvey WF, Driban JB, Wang C. Outcome expectations and osteoarthritis: perceived benefits of exercise are associated with self-efficacy and depression. Arthrit Care Res. 2016;69:491?498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bosmans MW, Hofland HW, De Jong AE, et al. Coping with burns: the role of coping self-efficacy in the recovery from traumatic stress following burn injuries. J Behav Med. 2015;38:642–651.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner-Cobb JM, Michalaki M, Osborn M. Self-conscious emotions in patients suffering from chronic musculoskeletal pain: a brief report. Psychol Health. 2015;30:495–501.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crepeau EB. “I need someone to keep an eye on me”: the power of attention in patient-practitioner interactions. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2419-2427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Cornwell P, et al. Qualitative exploration of a client-centered, goal-directed approach to community-based occupational therapy for adults with traumatic brain injury. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;64:559–568.
   Google Scholar
• Schoeb V, Burge E. Perceptions of patients and physiotherapists on patient participation: a narrative synthesis of qualitative studies. Physiother Res Int. 2012;17:80–91.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ridgway E, Grose J, Charles A, et al. Does labelling a rare cancer diagnosis 'good' affect the patient's experience of treatment and recovery? Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2016;25:348–355.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zachariae R, Pedersen CG, Jensen AB, et al. Association of perceived physician communication style with patient satisfaction, distress, cancer-related self-efficacy, and perceived control over the disease. Br J Cancer. 2003;88:658–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiscella K, Franks P, Doescher MP, et al. Disparities in health care by race, ethnicity, and language among the insured: findings from a national sample. Med Care. 2002;40:52–59.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schyve PM. Language differences as a barrier to quality and safety in health care: the Joint Commission perspective. J Gen Intern Med. 2007;22:360–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berg K, Rise MB, Balandin S, et al. Speech pathologists' experience of involving people with stroke-induced aphasia in clinical decision making during rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:870–878.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark FA. Occupation embedded in a real life: interweaving occupational science and occupational therapy [1993 Eleanor Clark Slagle Lecture]. Am J Occup Ther. 1993;47:1067–1078.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doyle C, Lennox L, Bell D. A systematic review of evidence on the links between patient experience and clinical safety and effectiveness. BMJ Open. 2013;3:e001570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charlton CR, Dearing KS, Berry JA, et al. Nurse practitioners' communication styles and their impact on patient outcomes: an integrated literature review. J Am Acad Nurse Prac. 2008;20:382–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel BA, Leonhart R, Helmes AW. Communication matters: the impact of communication and participation in decision making on breast cancer patients' depression and quality of life. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;77:391–397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner JN, Burns JK. Measuring social inclusion-a key outcome in global mental health. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;43:354–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nordenfelt L. On health, ability and activity: comments on some basic notions in the ICF. Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1461–1465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hendricks J, Hatch LR. Lifestyle and aging. In: Binstock R, George L, Cutler S, editors. Handbook of aging: handbook of aging and the social sciences. Burlington (VT): Academic Press; 2011. p. 301–19.
   Google Scholar
• Galvaan R. Occupational choice: the significance of socio-economic and political factors. In: Whiteford G, Hocking C, editors. Occupational science: society, inclusion, participation. 1st ed. West Sussex (UK): Blackwell Publishing Ltd; 2012. p. 152–62.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296–305.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychol Rev. 1977;84:191–215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erez A, Rothschild E, Katz N, et al. Executive functioning, awareness, and participation in daily life after mild traumatic brain injury: a preliminary study. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:634–640.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Edwards A, Elwyn G. Power imbalance prevents shared decision making. BMJ. 2014;348:Artn G3178.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carman KL, Dardess P, Maurer M, et al. Patient and family engagement: a framework for understanding the elements and developing interventions and policies. Health Aff. 2013;32:223–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faber MJ, Grande S, Wollersheim H, et al. Narrowing the gap between organisational demands and the quest for patient involvement: the case for coordinated care pathways. Int J Care Coordination. 2014;17:72–78.
   Google Scholar
• Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. Conditions for patient participation and non-participation in health care. Nurs Ethics. 2006;13:503–514.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KAS, et al. Authoritarian physicians and patients' fear of being labeled 'difficult' among key obstacles to shared decision making. Health Aff. 2012;31:1030–1038.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts K. Exploring participation: older people on discharge from hospital. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40:413–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson AGH. The meaning of patient involvement and participation in health care consultations: a taxonomy. Soc Sci Med. 2007;64:1297–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muhlbacher AC, Juhnke C. Patient preferences versus physicians' judgement: does it make a difference in healthcare decision making? Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2013;11:163–180.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hicks E, Sims-Gould J, Byrne K, et al. “She was a little bit unrealistic”: choice in healthcare decision making for older people. J Aging Stud. 2012;26:140–148.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• American Academy of Physical Medicine Rehabilitation [Internet]. What conditions do physiatrists treat; 2016 [cited 2016 Nov 28]. Available from: http://www.aapmr.org/career-center/medical-students/a-medical-student's-guide-to-pm-r/what-conditions-do-physiatrists-treat.
   Google Scholar
• Babulal GM, Huskey TN, Roe CM, et al. Cognitive impairments and mood disruptions negatively impact instrumental activities of daily living performance in the first three months after a first stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22:144–151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Demers L, Robichaud L, et al. Short-term changes in and predictors of participation of older adults after stroke following acute care or rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherer M, Davis LC, Sander AM, et al. Prognostic importance of self-reported traits/problems/strengths and environmental barriers/facilitators for predicting participation outcomes in persons with traumatic brain injury: a systematic review. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1162–1173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Law M, King S, et al. A conceptual model of the factors affecting the recreation and leisure participation of children with disabilities. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2003;23:63–90.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hammel J, Magasi S, Heinemann A, et al. Environmental barriers and supports to everyday participation: a qualitative insider perspective from people with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:578–588.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jellema S, van der Sande R, van Hees S, et al. Role of environmental factors on resuming valued activities poststroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:991–1002 e1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verdonschot MM, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Impact of environmental factors on community participation of persons with an intellectual disability: a systematic review. J Intell Disabil Res. 2009;53:54–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH, Riley B, Wang E, et al. Physical activity participation among persons with disabilities: barriers and facilitators. Am J Prev Med. 2004;26:419–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van'T Leven N, Jonsson H. Doing and being in the atmosphere of the doing: environmental influences on occupational performance in a nursing home. Scand J Occup Ther. 2002;9:148–155.
   Google Scholar
• Buntin MB. Access to postacute rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88:1488–1493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph-Williams N, Elwyn G, Edwards A. Knowledge is not power for patients: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of patient-reported barriers and facilitators to shared decision making. Patient Educ Couns. 2014;94:291–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernabeo E, Holmboe ES. Patients, providers, and systems need to acquire a specific set of competencies to achieve truly patient-centered care. Health Aff (Millwood). 2013;32:250–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer J, et al. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 1993;8:75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Bernstein J, Alexis N, Bernstein IL, et al. Health effects of air pollution. J Allergy Clinical Immun. 2004;114:1116–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guptill C. Injured professional musicians and the complex relationship between occupation and health. J Occup Sci. 2013;19:258–270.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson J, Carlson M, Rubayi S, et al. Qualitative study of principles pertaining to lifestyle and pressure ulcer risk in adults with spinal cord injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:567–578.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Townsend A, Wyke S, Hunt K. Self-managing and managing self: practical and moral dilemmas in accounts of living with chronic illness. Chronic Illn. 2006;2:185–194.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Turner-Stokes L. Goal attainment scaling (GAS) in rehabilitation: a practical guide. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23:362–370.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Baptiste S, McColl M, et al. The Canadian occupational performance measure: an outcome measure for occupational therapy. Can J Occup Ther. 1990;57:82–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hoving C, Visser A, Mullen PD, et al. A history of patient education by health professionals in Europe and North America: from authority to shared decision making education. Patient Educ Couns. 2010;78:275–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Advancing Health [Internet]. A new definition of patient engagement: What is engagement and why is it important?; 2010 [cited 2016 Nov 30]. Available from: http://www.cfah.org/pdfs/CFAH_Engagement_Behavior_Framework_current.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Eldh AC, Ekman I, Ehnfors M. A comparison of the concept of patient participation and patients' descriptions as related to healthcare definitions. Int J Nurs Termino Classif. 2010;21:21–32.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Allen ML, Cook BL, Carson N, et al. Patient-provider therapeutic alliance contributes to patient activation in community mental health clinics. Adm Policy Ment Hlth. 2015;44:431?440.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rieckmann P, Boyko A, Centonze D, et al. Achieving patient engagement in multiple sclerosis: a perspective from the multiple sclerosis in the 21st Century Steering Group. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2015;4:202–218.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jesus TS, Silva IL. Toward an evidence-based patient-provider communication in rehabilitation: linking communication elements to better rehabilitation outcomes. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:315–328.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street RL Jr, Makoul G, Arora NK, et al. How does communication heal? Pathways linking clinician-patient communication to health outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:295–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Haes H, Bensing J. Endpoints in medical communication research, proposing a framework of functions and outcomes. Patient Educ Couns. 2009;74:287–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wain HR, Kneebone II, Billings J. Patient experience of neurologic rehabilitation: a qualitative investigation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:1366–1371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chan DK, Lonsdale C, Ho PY, et al. Patient motivation and adherence to postsurgery rehabilitation exercise recommendations: the influence of physiotherapists' autonomy-supportive behaviors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1977–1982.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cardol M, De Jong BA, Ward CD. On autonomy and participation in rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24:970–974. discussion 5–1004.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeuner R, Frosch DL, Kuzemchak MD, et al. Physicians' perceptions of shared decision-making behaviours: a qualitative study demonstrating the continued chasm between aspirations and clinical practice. Health Expect. 2015;18:2465–2476.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Manary MP, Boulding W, Staelin R, et al. The patient experience and health outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:201–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mazzi MA, Bensing J, Rimondini M, et al. How do lay people assess the quality of physicians' communicative responses to patients' emotional cues and concerns? An international multicentre study based on videotaped medical consultations. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;90:347–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmadottir G. Client-therapist relationships: experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Brit J Occup Ther. 2006;69:394–401.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrlich I. Participation in illegitimate activities – theoretical and empirical investigation. J Polit Econ. 1973;81:521–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saegert S, Winkel G. Crime, social capital, and community participation. Am J Community Psychol. 2004;34:219–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brymer E, Schweitzer R. The search for freedom in extreme sports: a phenomenological exploration. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2013;14:865–873.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Partington S, Partington E, Olivier S. The dark side of flow: a qualitative study of dependence in big wave surfing. Sport Psychol. 2009;23:170–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pyatak EA, Blanche EI, Garber SL, et al. Conducting intervention research among underserved populations: lessons learned and recommendations for researchers. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:1190–1198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin W, Rankel M, Kagan L, et al. To stay or to go, to speak or stay silent, to act or not to act: moral distress as experienced by psychologists. Ethics Behav. 2005;15:197–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hartley MT, Cartwright BY. A survey of current and projected ethical dilemmas of rehabilitation counselors. Rehab Res Pol Educ. 2016;30:32–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houston S, Casanova MA, Leveille M, et al. The intensity and frequency of moral distress among different healthcare disciplines. J Clin Ethics. 2013;24:98–112.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang FH, Coster WJ. Conceptualizing the construct of participation in adults with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1791–1798.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar