Factor validation and Rasch analysis of the individual recovery outcomes counter

References

• Slade M. Policy rationale. In: Slade M, editor. Personal recovery and mental illness. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press; 2009. p. 74–77.
   Google Scholar
• Tomes N. The patient as a policy factor: a historical case study of the consumer/survivor movement in mental health. Health Aff (Millwood). 2006;25:720–729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deegan PE. Recovery and empowerment for people with psychiatric disabilities. Soc Work Health Care. 1997;25:11–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jacobson N, Greenley D. What is recovery? A conceptual model and explication. Psychiatr Serv. 2001;52:482–485.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topor A, Borg M, Di Girolamo S, et al. Not just an individual journey: social aspects of recovery. Int J Soc Psychiatry. 2011;57:90–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson L, O’Connell MJ, Tondora J, et al. Recovery in serious mental illness: a new wine or just a new bottle?. Prof Psychol Res Pract. 2005;36:480–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickley T, Wright N. The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part one: a review of the peer-reviewed literature using a systematic approach. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011a;18:247–256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stickley T, Wright N. The British research evidence for recovery, papers published between 2006 and 2009 (inclusive). Part two: a review of the grey literature including book chapters and policy documents. J Psychiatr Ment Health Nurs. 2011b;18:297–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony WA. Recovery from mental illness: the guiding vision of the mental health service system in the 1990s. Psychosoc Rehabil J. 1993;16:11–23.
   Google Scholar
• Carson J, McManus G, Chander A. Recovery: a selective review of the literature and resources. Ment Health Soc Incl. 2010;14:35–44.
   Google Scholar
• Ion R, Monger B, Hardie S, et al. A tool to measure progress and outcome in recovery. Br J Ment Health Nurs. 2013;2:211–215.
   Google Scholar
• Le Boutillier C, Chevalier A, Lawrence V, et al. Staff understanding of recovery-orientated mental health practice: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. Implement Sci. 2015;10:87.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salzmann-Erikson M. An integrative review of what contributes to personal recovery in psychiatric disabilities. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2013;34:185–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepherd A, Doyle M, Sanders C, et al. Personal recovery within forensic settings: systematic review and meta-synthesis of qualitative methods studies. Crim Behav Ment Health. 2016;26:59–75.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Lith T, Schofield MJ, Fenner P. Identifying the evidence-base for art-based practices and their potential benefit for mental health recovery: a critical review. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1309–1323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scheyett A, DeLuca J, Morgan C. Recovery in severe mental illnesses: A literature review of recovery measures. Soc Work Res. 2013;37:286–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanks V, Williams J, Leamy M, et al. Measures of personal recovery: a systematic review. Psychiatr Serv. 2013;64:974–980.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Monger B, Hardie SM, Ion R, et al. The individual recovery outcomes counter: preliminary validation of a personal recovery measure. Psychiatry. 2013;37:221–227.
   Google Scholar
• Tractenberg RE. Classical and modern measurement theories, patient reports, and clinical outcomes. Contemp Clin Trials. 2011;31:1–3.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbina S. Essentials of psychological testing. Hoboken (NJ): John Wiley & Sons Inc; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Hobart JC. The problem with health measurement. Patient Prefer Adherence. 2011;5:279– 290.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Mayhew A, Glanzman AM, et al. Rasch analysis of clinical outcome measures in spinal muscular atrophy. Muscle Nerve. 2014;49:422–430.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christensen KB, Engelhard J, Jr, Salzberger T. Ask the experts: Rasch vs. factor analysis. Rasch Measur Trans. 2012;26:1373–1378.
   Google Scholar
• Waugh RF, Chapman ES. An analysis of dimensionality using factor analysis (true-score theory) and Rasch measurement: What is the difference? Which method is better?. J App Measur. 2005;6:80–99.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Yu CH, Popp SO, Digangi S, et al. Assessing unidimensionality: a comparison of Rasch modeling, parallel analysis, and TETRAD. Pract Assessment Res Eval. 2007;12:1–19.
   Google Scholar
• Comrey AL, Lee HB. A first course in factor analysis. Hillsdale (NJ): Erlbaum; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Hair JFJ, Anderson RE, Tatham RL, et al. Multivariate data analysis. Cambridge (UK): Pearson; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Giffort D, Schmook A, Woody C. Recovery assessment scale. Chicago (IL): Department of Mental Health; 1995.
   Google Scholar
• Corrigan PW, Salzer M, Ralph RO, et al. Examining the factor structure of the recovery assessment scale. Schizophr Bull. 2004;30:1035–1041.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sederer LI, Dickey B, Eisen SV. Behavior and symptom identification scale (BASIS-32). In: Sederer Ll, Dickey B, editors. Outcomes assessment in clinical practice. Baltimore (MD): Williams & Wilkins; 1996. p. 65–69.
   Google Scholar
• Eisen SV, Wilcox M, Leff HS. Assessing behavioural health outcomes in outpatient programs: reliability and validity of the BASIS-32. J Behav Health Serv Res. 1999;26:5–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond TG, Fox CM. Applying the Rasch model. fundamental measurement in the human sciences. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Cicchetti DV. Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess. 1995;6:284–290.
   Google Scholar
• Rasch G. Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Massof DW. Is the partial credit model a Rasch model? J Appl Meas. 2012;13:114–131.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. Partial credit models” (PCM) and “Rating Scale Models” (RSM). Rasch Measur Trans. 2000;14:768.
   Google Scholar
• Barbic SP, Bartlett SJ, Mayo NE. Emotional vitality in caregivers: application of Rasch measurement theory with secondary data to development and test a new measure. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29:705–716.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barbic SP, Kidd SA, Davidson L, et al. Validation of the brief version of the recovery self-assessment (RSA-B) using Rasch measurement theory. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2015; 38:349–358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Covic T, Pallant J, Conaghan P, et al. A longitudinal evaluation of the center for epidemiologic studies-depression scale (CES-D) in a rheumatoid arthritis population using Rasch analysis. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pallant JF, Tennant A. An introduction to the Rasch measurement model: an example using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Br J Clin Psychol. 2007;46:1–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Optimizing rating scale category effectiveness. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:85–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wright BD, Linacre JM, Gustafson J, et al. Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measur Trans. 1994; 8:370.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Winsteps Rasch tutorial 2 [Internet]. 2012. [cited 2015 January 5]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com/a/winsteps-tutorial-2.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wright BD, Masters GN. Rating scale analysis. Chicago (IL): MESA Press; 1982.
   Google Scholar
• Sick J. Rasch measurement in language education part 6: Rasch measurement and factor analysis. JALT Test Eval SIG Newsl. 2011;15:15–17.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Structure in Rasch residuals: why principal components analysis (PCA)? Rasch Measur Trans. 1998; 12:636.
   Google Scholar
• Linacre JM. Data variance explained by Rasch measures. Rasch Measur Trans. 2006;20:1045.
   Google Scholar
• Smith EV. Jr. Detecting and evaluating the impact of multidimensionality using item fit statistics and principal component analysis of residuals. J Appl Meas. 2002;3:205–231.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Linacre JM. DIF – DPF – bias – interactions concepts [Internet]. no date [cited 2015 January 15]. Available from: http://www.winsteps.com/winman/difconcepts.htm
   Google Scholar
• Andrich D. An index of person separation in latent trait theory, the traditional KR. 20 index, and the Guttman scale response pattern. Educ Res Perspect. 1982;9:95–104.
   Google Scholar
• Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychom. 1951;16:297–334.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stewart DW. The application and misapplication of factor analysis in marketing research. J Mark Res. 1981;18:51–62.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Costello A, Osborne J. Best practices in exploratory factor analysis: Four recommendations for getting the most from your analysis. Pract Assess Res Evaluat. 2005;10:173–178.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson, Allyn, and Bacon; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• George D, Mallery P. SPSS for Windows step by step: a simple guide and reference. 11.0 update, 4th ed. Boston (MA): Allyn & Bacon; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Wells C, Wollack J. An instructor’s guide to understanding test reliability [Internet]. 2003. [cited 2016 December 2]. Available from: http://testing.wisc.edu/Reliability.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Byrne B. Structural equation modeling with AMOS. New York (NY): Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Gandek B. Methods for testing data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability: the IQOLA project approach. J Clin Epidemiol. 1998;51:945–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yen WM. Effects of local item dependence on the fit and equating performance of the three-parameter logistic model. Appl Psychol Measur. 1984;8:125–145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox CM, Jones JA. Uses of Rasch modeling in counseling psychology research. J Couns Psychol. 1998;45:30–45.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curran PJ, West SG, Finch JF. The robustness of test statistics to nonnormality and specification error in confirmatory factor analysis. Psychol Methods 1996;1:16–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aguinis H, Gottfredson RK, Joo H. Best-practice recommendations for defining, identifying, and handling outliers. Organ Res Methods. 2013;16:270–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dela Cruz AM, Bernstein IH, Greer TL, et al. Self-rated measure of pain frequency, intensity, and burden: psychometric properties of a new instrument for the assessment of pain. J Psychiatr Res. 2014;59:155–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR. Health measurement scales: a practical guide to their development and use. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 1989.
   Google Scholar
• Ridgway P. Re-storying psychiatric disability: learning from first person recovery narratives. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2001;24:335–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar