Validation of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-Third Edition in patients with stroke

References

• Cooke DM, McKenna K, Fleming J. Development of a standardized occupational therapy screening tool for visual perception in adults. Scand J Occup Ther. 2005;12:59–71.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Warren M. Evaluation and treatment of visual deficits following brain injury. St Louis (MO): Mosby Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• van Ravensberg CD, Tyldesley DA, Rozendal RH, et al. Visual perception in hemiplegic patients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1984;65:304–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman PJ, Leong L. Perceptual impairment after stroke: improvements during the first 3 months. Disabil Rehabil. 1992;14:136–139.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nys GM, van Zandvoort MJ, de Kort PL, et al. Cognitive disorders in acute stroke: prevalence and clinical determinants. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2007;23:408–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edmans JA. The recovery of perceptual problems after stroke and the impact on daily life. Clin Rehabil. 1991;4:301–310.
   Google Scholar
• Mercier L, Audet T, Hebert R, et al. Impact of motor, cognitive, and perceptual disorders on ability to perform activities of daily living after stroke. Stroke. 2001;32:2602–2608.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones SA, Shinton RA. Improving outcome in stroke patients with visual problems. Age Ageing. 2006;35:560–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown T, Elliot S, Bourne R, et al. The convergent validity of the Developmental Test of Visual Perception-Adolescent and Adults, Motor-Free Visual Perception Test-third edition and Test of Visual Perceptional Skills (non-motor)-third edition when used with adults. Br J Occup Ther. 2012;75:134–143.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu EC, Wu WC, Chou CX, et al. Test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change of the Test of Visual Perceptual Skills-third edition in patients with stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97:1917–1923.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaytor N, Schmitter-Edgecombe M. The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: a review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychol Rev. 2003;13:181–197.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tacca MC. Commonalities between perception and cognition. Front Psychol. 2011;2:358.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh YW, Lin JH, Wang CH, et al. Discriminative, predictive and evaluative properties of the simplified stroke rehabilitation assessment of movement instrument in patients with stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:454–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Pearson Education, Inc.; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Drost EA. Validity and reliability in social science research. Educ Res Perspect. 2011;38:105–123.
   Google Scholar
• Parton A, Malhotra P, Husain M. Hemispatial neglect. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatr. 2004;75:13–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin NA. Test of visual perceptual skills. 3rd ed. Novato, CA: Academic Therapy Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the Barthel Index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–65.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hsueh IP, Lee MM, Hsieh CL. Psychometric characteristics of the Barthel activities of daily living index in stroke patients. J Formos Med Assoc. 2001;100:526–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wellwood I, Dennis MS, Warlow CP. A comparison of the Barthel Index and the OPCS disability instrument used to measure outcome after acute stroke. Age Ageing. 1995;24:54–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook M, Skilbeck CE. An activities index for use with stroke patients. Age Ageing. 1983;12:166–170.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wade DT, Legh-Smith J, Langton Hewer R. Social activities after stroke: measurement and natural history using the Frenchay Activities Index. Int Rehabil Med. 1985;7:176–181.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Guo N-W, Liu H-C, Wong P-F, et al. Chinese version and norms of the Mini-Mental State Examination. J Rehabil Med Assoc. 1988;16:52–59.
   Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Stickle TR, Love JM, et al. Latent structure of the Wisconsin Card Sorting Test: a confirmatory factor analytic study. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2005;20:355–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heaton RK, Chelune GJ, Talley JL, et al. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test manual revised and expanded. Lutz (FL): Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc., 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Greve KW, Bianchini KJ, Hartley SM, et al. The Wisconsin Card Sorting Test in stroke rehabilitation: factor structure and relationship to outcome. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 1999;14:497–509.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salter K, Jutai JW, Teasell R, et al. Issues for selection of outcome measures in stroke rehabilitation: ICF activity. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27:315–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Ware JE Jr, Raczek AE. The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs. Med Care. 1993;31:247–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cowan RE, Nash MS, de Groot S, et al. Adapted manual wheelchair circuit: test–retest reliability and discriminative validity in persons with spinal cord injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1270–1280.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tsze DS, von Baeyer CL, Bulloch B, et al. Validation of self-report pain scales in children. Pediatrics. 2013;132:e971–e979.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McHorney CA, Tarlov AR. Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res. 1995;4:293–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pynoo B, Devolder P, Duyck W, et al. Do hospital physicians' attitudes change during PACS implementation? A cross-sectional acceptance study. Int J Med Inform. 2012;81:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu ZZ, Jiang SJ, Bi S, et al. Relationship between linguistic functions and cognitive functions in a clinical study of Chinese patients with post-stroke aphasia. Chin Med J. 2013;126:1252–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar