Translation, reliability, and clinical utility of the Melbourne Assessment 2

References

• Hobart JC, Cano SJ, Zajicek JP, et al. Rating scales as outcome measures for clinical trials in neurology: problems, solutions, and recommendations. Lancet Neurol. 2007;6:1094–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cano SJ, Hobart JC. Watch out, watch out, the FDA are about. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:408–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerber CN, Labruyère R, van Hedel HJA. Reliability and responsiveness of upper limb motor assessments for children with central neuromotor disorders: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30:19–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Carlin JB, Chondros P, et al. Reliability of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2001;43:761–767.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourke-Taylor H. Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function: construct validity and correlation with the pediatric evaluation of disability inventory. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:92–96.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Imms C, Carey L. Establishing validity of a modified Melbourne Assessment for children ages 2 to 4 years. Am J Occup Ther. 2008;62:373–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson LM, Randall MJ, Reddihough DS, et al. Development of a clinical assessment of quality of movement for unilateral upper-limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 1994;36:965–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Imms C, Carey L. Further evidence of validity of the Modified Melbourne Assessment for neurologically impaired children aged 2 to 4 years. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2012;54:424–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James S, Ziviani J, Ware RS, et al. Randomized controlled trial of web-based multimodal therapy for unilateral cerebral palsy to improve occupational performance. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2015;57:530–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sakzewski L, Provan K, Ziviani J, et al. Comparison of dosage of intensive upper limb therapy for children with unilateral cerebral palsy: how big should the therapy pill be? Res Dev Disabil. 2015;37:9–16.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Psychouli P, Kennedy CR. Modified constraint-induced movement therapy as a home-based intervention for children with cerebral palsy. Pediatr Phys Ther. 2016;28:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peri E, Biffi E, Maghini C, et al. Quantitative evaluation of performance during robot-assisted treatment. Methods Inf Med. 2016;55:84–88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cusick A, Vasquez M, Knowles L, et al. Effect of rater training on reliability of Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function scores. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bard R, Chaléat-Valayer E, Combey A, et al. Upper limb assessment in children with cerebral palsy: translation and reliability of the French version for the Melbourne unilateral upper limb assessment (test de Melbourne). Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2009;52:297–310.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Klingels K, De Cock P, Desloovere K, et al. Comparison of the Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function and the quality of upper extremity skills test in hemiplegic CP. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:904–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Imms C, Carey LM, et al. Rasch analysis of The Melbourne assessment of unilateral upper limb function. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2014;56:665–672.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Randall M, Johnson LM, Reddihough DS. The Melbourne Assessment 2: a test of unilateral upper limb function [Internet]. Melbourne: Royal Children's Hospital; 2011. Available from: http://www.rch.org.au/ot/melbourne_assessment_2
   Google Scholar
• Elvrum A-KG, Saether R, Riphagen II, et al. Outcome measures evaluating hand function in children with bilateral cerebral palsy: a systematic review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:662–671.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang T-N, Liang K-J, Liu Y-C, et al. Psychometric and clinimetric properties of the Melbourne Assessment 2 in children with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1836–1841.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Int J Qual Health Care. 2006;18:377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson A-C, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rösblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne Assessment 2: guidelines for establishing reliable administration and scoring [Internet]. Available from: http://www.rch.org.au/melbourneassessment/ma2_resources/
   Google Scholar
• Weir JP. Quantifying test–retest reliability using the intraclass correlation coefficient and the sem. J Strength Cond Res. 2005;19:231–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dawson-Saunders B, Trapp RG. Basic and clinical biostatistics. 2nd ed. Norwalk (CT): Appleton and Lange; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Ludbrook J. Statistical techniques for comparing measurers and methods of measurement: a critical review. Clin Exp Pharmacol Physiol. 2002;29:527–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33:159–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spirtos M, O’Mahony P, Malone J. Interrater reliability of the Melbourne Assessment of Unilateral Upper Limb Function for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Am J Occup Ther. 2011;65:378–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingels K, Jaspers E, Van de Winckel A, et al. A systematic review of arm activity measures for children with hemiplegic cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2010;24:887–900.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Melbourne Assessment 2: Administration Guidelines [Internet]. Available from: http://www.rch.org.au/melbourneassessment/ma2_resources/
   Google Scholar
• McHugh ML. Interrater reliability: the kappa statistic. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:276–282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar