When I do, I become someone: experiences of occupational performance in young adults with cerebral palsy

References

• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen C, Baum CM, Bass JD. Occupational therapy: performance, participation and well-being. Thorofare (NJ): Slack; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Christiansen CH, Backman C, Little BR, et al. Occupations and well-being: a study of personal projects. Am J Occup Ther. 1999;53:91.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ostensjo S, Carlberg EB, Vollestad NK. Everyday functioning in young children with cerebral palsy: functional skills, caregiver assistance, and modifications of the environment. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:603–612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen SI, Flachs EM, Damsgaard MT, et al. European study of frequency of participation of adolescents with and without cerebral palsy. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2014;18:282–294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pierce D. Untangling occupation and activity. Am J Occup Ther. 2001;55:138–146.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law M, Cooper B, Strong S, et al. The-Person-Environment-Occupation-model: a transactive approach to occupational performance. Can J Occup Ther. 1996;63:9–23.
   Google Scholar
• Polatajko HJ. Dreams, dilemmas, and decisions for occupational therapy practice in a new millennium: a Canadian perspective. Am J Occup Ther. 1994;48:590.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong S, Rigby P, Stewart D, et al. Application of the Person-Environment-Occupation Model: a practical tool. Can J Occup Ther. 1999;66:122–133.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nelson DL. Occupation: form and performance. Am J Occup Ther. 1988;42:633–641.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granlund M. Participation-challenges in conceptualization, measurement and intervention. Child Care Health Dev. 2013;39:470–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Adair B, Keen D, et al. ’Participation’: a systematic review of language, definitions, and constructs used in intervention research with children with disabilities. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;58:29–38.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hemmingsson H, Jonsson H. An occupational perspective on the concept of participation in the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: some critical remarks. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:569–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Paneth N, Leviton A, et al. A report: the definition and classification of cerebral palsy April 2006. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49:8–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Himmelmann K, Uvebrant P. The panorama of cerebral palsy in Sweden. XI. Changing patterns in the birth-year period 2003–2006. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103:18–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohrvall AM, Eliasson AC, Lowing K, et al. Self-care and mobility skills in children with cerebral palsy, related to their manual ability and gross motor function classifications. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:1048–1055.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Opheim A, Jahnsen R, Olsson E, et al. Walking function, pain, and fatigue in adults with cerebral palsy: a 7-year follow-up study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2009;51:381–388.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malone LA, Vogtle LK. Pain and fatigue consistency in adults with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:385–391.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bottcher L. Children with spastic cerebral palsy, their cognitive functioning, and social participation: a review. Child Neuropsychol. 2010;16:209–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bodimeade HL, Whittingham K, Lloyd O, et al. Executive function in children and adolescents with unilateral cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:926–933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandstrom K. The lived body: experiences from adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:432–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marton F. Phenomenography: describing conceptions of the world around us. Instr Sci. 1981;10:177–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lepp M, Ringberg KC. Phenomenography: a qualitative research approach. In: Hallberg L, editor. Qualitative methods in public health research: theoretical foundations and practical examples. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2002. p. 105–135.
   Google Scholar
• Sjöström B, Dahlgren LO. Applying phenomenography in nursing research. J Adv Nurs. 2002;40:339–345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Åkerlind GS. Variation and commonality in phenomenographic research methods. High Educ Res Dev. 2012;31:115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eliasson AC, Krumlinde-Sundholm L, Rosblad B, et al. The Manual Ability Classification System (MACS) for children with cerebral palsy: scale development and evidence of validity and reliability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2006;48:549–554.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Meeteren J, Nieuwenhuijsen C, de Grund A, et al. Using the manual ability classification system in young adults with cerebral palsy and normal intelligence. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1885–1893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elisasson A-C. Supplementary MACS level identification chart [Internet]. Stockholm: Karolinska Institutet; 2010; [cited 2017 Aug 23]. Available from: http://www.macs.nu/files/MACS_identification_chart_eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hidecker MJ, Paneth N, Rosenbaum PL, et al. Developing and validating the Communication Function Classification System for individuals with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011;53:704–710.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palisano R, Rosenbaum P, Bartlett D, et al. Gross motor function classification system expanded and revised: canchild centre for childhood disability research, McMaster University; 2007; [Internet] [cited 2017 Aug 23]. Available from: https://www.canchild.ca/system/tenon/assets/attachments/000/000/058/original/GMFCS-ER_English.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PL, Palisano RJ, Bartlett DJ, et al. Development of the Gross Motor Function Classification System for cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:249–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kvale S. Doing interviews. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. NVivo 10 software program. Melbourne (Australia): QSR International; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Hammell KW. Dimensions of meaning in the occupations of daily life. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71:296.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hasselkus BR. The meaning of everyday occupation. Thorofare (NJ): SLACK; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher AG. Occupation-centred, occupation-based, occupation-focused: same, same or different? Scand J Occup Ther. 2013;20:162–173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hammell KRW. Belonging, occupation, and human well-being: an exploration. Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwartz L, Engel JM, Jensen MP. Pain in persons with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1243–1246.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnsen R, Villien L, Stanghelle JK, et al. Fatigue in adults with cerebral palsy in Norway compared with the general population. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2003;45:296–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jahnsen R, Villien L, Egeland T, et al. Locomotion skills in adults with cerebral palsy. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18:309–316.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilcock AA. Reflections on doing, being and becoming. Aust Occup Ther J. 1999;46:1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Bottcher L, Flachs EM, Uldall P. Attentional and executive impairments in children with spastic cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52:e42–e47.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mandich A, Rodger S. Doing, being and becoming: their importance for children. In: Rodger S, Ziviani J, editors. Occupational therapy with children: understanding children’s occupations and enabling participation. Oxford: Blackwell; 2006. p. 115–135.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. On the functional properties of perceived self-efficacy revisited. J Manage. 2012;38:9–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar