252
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Article

Measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the Motor Assessment Scale, based on Rasch analysis

, , , , , , & show all
Pages 1095-1100 | Received 22 Jul 2015, Accepted 16 Dec 2017, Published online: 02 Jan 2018

References

  • Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new Motor Assessment Scale for Stroke Patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65:175–180.
  • Tucak C, Scott J, Kirkman A, et al. Relationship between initial Motor Assessment Scale scores and length of stay, mobility at discharge and discharge destination after stroke. J Phys. 2010;38:7–13.
  • Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK. Can Physiotherapy after stroke based on the Bobath concept result in improved quality of movement compared to the motor relearning programme. Qual Mov Neurol Rehab. 2010;16:69–80.
  • O’Connell C, Galvin R, Varghese AC, et al. Analysis of the inter-rater reliability of the Motor Assessment Scale and the Fugl-Meyer Scale. Alladin Projec IST. Faculty of health sciences, Trinity College Dublin. 2002.
  • Poole JL, Whitney SL. Motor Assessment Scale for stroke patients: concurrent validity and interrater reliability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1988; 69:195–197.
  • Malouin F, Pichard L, Bonneau C, et al. Evaluating motor recovery early after stroke: comparison of the Fugl-Meyer assessment and the Motor Assessment Scale. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;75:1206–1212.
  • Aamodt G, Kjendhal A, Jahnsen R. Dimensionality and scalability of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Disabil Rehabil. 2006;28:1007–1013.
  • Miller KJ, Slade AL, Pallant JF, et al. Evaluation of the psychometric properties of the upper limb subcales of the motor assessment scale using a Rasch analysis model. J Rehabil Med. 2010;42:315–322.
  • Hsueh IP, Hsieh CL. Responsiveness of two upper extremity function instruments for stroke inpatients receiving rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:617–624.
  • English CK, Hiller SL, Stiller K, et al. The sensitivity of three commonly used outcome measures to detect change amongst patients receiving inpatient rehabilitation following stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20:52–55.
  • Kjendhal A, Jahnsen R, Aamodt G. Motor Assessment Scale in Norway: translations and inter-rater reliability. Adv Phys. 2005;7:7–12.
  • Bohls C, Heise KF, Gloqauer C, et al. Authorized German translation of the Motor Assessment Scale (MAS). Rehabilitation. 2008;47:172–177.
  • Conte AL, Ferrari PP, Carvalho TB, et al. Confiabilidade, compreensão e aceitação da versão em português da Motor Assessment Scale em pacientes com acidente vascular encefálico. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2009;13:405–411.
  • Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-exame do estado mental: características psicométricas em idosos ambulatoriais. Rev Saúde Pública. 2006;40:712–719.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Lif Res. 2010;19:539–549.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology and definitions of measurements properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
  • Wanderley ELS, Teixeira-Salmela LF, Laurentino GE, et al. Adaptação transcultural da Motor Assessment Scale (MAS) para o Brasil. Acta Fisiatr. 2015;22:65–71.
  • Bond TG, Fox GR. Applying the Rasch model: fundamental measurement in the human sciences. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2001. p. 255.
  • Tesio L. Measuring behaviors and perceptions: Rasch analysis as a tool for rehabilitation research. Journal Rehabil Med. 2003;35:105–115.
  • Portney L. Foundations of clinical research: application to practice, 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 2000. p. 768.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:10–22.
  • Hendricks HT, Limbeek JV, Geurts AC, et al. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1629–1637.
  • Sabari JS, Lim LA, Veloso CA, et al. Assessing arm and hand function after stroke: a validity test of the hierarchical scoring system used in the motor assessment scale for stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:1609–1615.
  • Pickering RL, Hubbard IJ, Baker KG, et al. Assessment of the upper limb in acute stroke: The validity of hierarchal scoring for the Motor Assessment Scale. Aust Occup Ther J. 2010;57:174–182.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.