Adjustment to finger amputation and silicone finger prosthesis use

References

• Rybarczyk B, Behel J. Limb loss and body image. In: Gallagher P, Desmond D, MacLachlan M, eds. Psychoprosthetics: state of the knowledge. London: Springer; 2008. p. 23–31.
   Google Scholar
• Pillet J. The aesthetic hand prosthesis. Orthop Clin North Am. 1981;12:961–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baumgartner R, Botta P. Amputationen und Prothesenversorgung der oberen Extremität. Stuttgart: Enke; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Beasley RW, De Bese GM. Upper limb amputations and prostheses. Orthop Clin North Am. 1986; 17:395–405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beasley RW. Hand and finger prostheses. J Hand Surg Am. 1987; 12:144–147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pezzin LE, Dillingham TR, MacKenzie EJ. Rehabilitation and the long-term outcomes of persons with trauma-related amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2000;81:292–300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burger H, Marincek C. Return to work after lower limb amputation. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29:1323–1329.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervelli V, Bottini DJ, Arpino A, et al. Bone-anchored implant in cosmetic finger reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2008; 53:365–367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davidson JH, Khor KE, Jones LE. A cross-sectional study of post-amputation pain in upper and lower limb amputees, experience of a tertiary referral amputee clinic. Disabil Rehabil. 2010; 32:1855–1862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flor H, Elbert T, Muhlnickel W, et al. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Exp Brain Res. 1998;119:205–212.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Farrell DA, Montella BJ, Bahor JL, et al. Long-term follow-up of 50 Duke silicone prosthetic fingers. J Hand Surg Br. 1996; 21:696–700.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pillet J. Partial-hand amputation-aesthetic restoration. In: Bowker JH, Michael JW, eds. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992. p. 227–35.
   Google Scholar
• Leow ME, Pho RW, Pereira BP. Esthetic prostheses in minor and major upper limb amputations. Hand Clin. 2001; 17:489–497.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuret Z, Burger H, Vidmar G. Influence of finger amputation on grip strength and objectively measured hand function: a descriptive cross-sectional study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2015; 38:181–188.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuret Z, Burger H, Vidmar G, et al. Impact of silicone prosthesis on hand function, grip power and grip-force tracking ability after finger amputation. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40:744–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maver T, Erzar D, Kerin S. Aesthetic prostheses after partial finger amputation. Rehabilitation (Ljubljana). 2010; 9:66–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wright FV. Prosthetic outcome measures for use with upper limb amputees: a systematic review of the peer reviewed literature, 1970 to 2009. J Prosthet Orthot. 2009;21:3–63.
   Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, Franchignoni F, Giordano A, et al. Trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales: a psychometric assessment using classical test theory and Rasch analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89:487–496.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond DM, MacLachlan M. Factor structure of the trinity amputation and prosthesis experience scales (TAPES) with individuals with acquired upper limb amputations. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;84:506–513.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinity Amputation and Prosthesis Experience Scales – Revised [Internet]. Dublin: Dublin Psychoprosthetics Group; 2001. Available from: http://psychoprosthetics.ie/assets/TAPES_2011_Sept_2011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Racy JC. Psychological adaptation to amputation. In: Browker JH, Mishael JW, eds. Atlas of limb prosthetics: surgical, prosthetic and rehabilitation principles. 2nd ed. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992. p. 707–17.
   Google Scholar
• Pilley MJ, Quinton DN. Digital prostheses for single finger amputations. J Hand Surg Br. 1999; 24:539–554.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Alison A, Mackinnon SE. Evaluation of digital prostheses. J Hand Surg Am. 1992;17:923–926.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pillet J, Didierjean-Pillet A. Aesthetic hand prosthesis: gadget or therapy? Presentation of a New Classification. J Hand Surg Br. 2001;26:523–528.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hopper RA, Griffiths S, Murray J, et al. Factors influencing use of digital prostheses in workers’ compensation recipients. J Hand Surg Am. 2000;25:80–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saradjian A, Thompson AR, Datta D. The experience of men using an upper limb prosthesis following amputation: positive coping and minimizing feeling different. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:871–883.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desmond DM. Coping, affective distress, and psychosocial adjustment among people with traumatic upper limb amputations. J Psychosom Res. 2007;62:15–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Positive meaning in amputation and thoughts about the amputated limb. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2000;24:196–204.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Biddiss E, Chau T. The roles of predisposing characteristics, established need, and enabling resources on upper extremity prosthesis use and abandonment. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:71–84.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Herberts P, Korner L, Caine K. Rehabilitation of unilateral below-elbow amputees with myoelectric prostheses. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1980;12:123–128.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gow D, MacLachlan M, Aird C. Reaching with electricity: externally powered prosthetics and embodiment. In: MacLachlan M, Gallagher P, eds. Enabling technologies: body image and body function. Edinburgh: Churchill Livingstone; 2004. p. 155–68.
   Google Scholar
• Murray CD. An interpretative phenomenological analysis of the embodiment of artificial limbs. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:963–973.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gallagher P, MacLachlan M. Adjustment to an artificial limb: a qualitative perspective. J Health Psychol. 2001;6:85–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horgan O, MacLachlan M. Psychosocial adjustment to lower-limb amputation: a review. Disabil Rehabil. 2004;26:837–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rybarczyk B, Nyenhuis DL, Nicholas JJ, et al. Body image, perceived social stigma and the prediction of psychosocial adjustment to leg amputation. Rehabil Psychol. 1995;40:95–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kent G, Thompson AR. Models of disfigurement: implications for treatment. In: Gilbert P, Miles J. Body shame: conceptualisation, research and treatment. Hove: Brunner-Routledge; 2002. p. 106–116.
   Google Scholar
• Ham R, Cotton L. Limb amputation: from aetiology to rehabilitation. London: Chapman & Hall; 1991.
   Google Scholar