Utility of the Croatian translation of the community integration questionnaire-revised in a sample of adults with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury

References

• World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: WHO; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Keith RA, et al. Advances in functional assessment for medical rehabilitation. Top GeriatrRehabil. 1986;1:59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Issues in the conceptualization and measurement of participation: an overview. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(9 Suppl 1):S5–S16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnston MV, Goverover Y, Dijkers M. Community activities and individuals' satisfaction with them: quality of life in the first year after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2005;86:735–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Rosenthal M, Kreutzer JS, et al. Assessment of community integration following rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1993;8:75–87.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie L, Wright-StClair V, Keogh J, et al. Community integration after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of the clinical implications of measurement and service provision for older adults. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:163–174.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laxe S, Tschiesner U, Zasler N, et al. What domains of the international classification of functioning, disability and health are covered by the most commonly used measurement instruments in traumatic brain injury research?. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2012;114:645–650.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chung P, Yun S, Khan F. A comparison of participation outcome measures and the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health Core Sets for traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2014;46:108–116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whiteneck G, Dijkers MP. Difficult to measure constructs: conceptual and methodological issues concerning participation and environmental factors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(11 Suppl 1):S22–S35.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuipers DP, Kendall M, Fleming J, et al. Comparison of the Sydney Psychological Reintegration Scale (SPRS) with the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ): psychometric properties. Brain Inj. 2004;18:161–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Tooth L. Patterns of community integration 2-5 years post-discharge from brain injury rehabilitation. Brain Inj. 2001;15:747–762.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkler D, Unsworth C, Sloan S. Factors that lead to successful community integration following severe traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehab. 2006;21:8–21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming J, Tooth L, Hassell M, et al. Prediction of community integration and vocational outcome 2–5 years after traumatic brain injury rehabilitation in Australia. Brain Inj. 1999;13:417–431.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lombardi F, Orsi M, Mammi P, et al. Validita del Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) e dati normativi per l'Italia [Validity of the Community Integration Questionnaire (CIQ) and Italian normative data]. J Ital Med Riab. 1997;11:23–34.
   Google Scholar
• Willemse-van Son AHP, Ribbers GM, Hop WCJ, et al. Community integration following moderate to severe traumatic brain injury: a longitudinal investigation. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:521–527.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andelic N, Sigurdardottir S, Schanke AK, et al. Disability, physical health and mental health 1 year after traumatic brain injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:1122–1131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forslund MV, Røe C, Arango-Lasprilla JC, et al. Impact of personal and environmental factors on employment outcome two years after moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:801–807.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Negahban H, Fattahizadeh P, Salehi R, et al. The persian version of community integration questionnaire in persons with multiple sclerosis: translation, reliability, validity, and factor analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35:1453–1459.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saeki S, Okazaki T, Hachisuka K. Concurrent validity of the community integration questionnaire in patients with traumatic brain injury in Japan. J Rehabil Med. 2006;38:333–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fraga-Maia HMS, Werneck G, Dourado I, et al. Translation, adaptation and validation of “Community Integration Questionnaire”. Cien Saude Colet. 2015;20:1341–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willer B, Ottenbacher KJ, Coad ML. The community integration questionnaire. A comparative examination. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1994;73:103–111.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International Classification of impairment, disabilities, and handicaps: a manual of classification relating to the consequences of disease. Geneva: World Health Organization;1993.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, et al. The Community Integration Questionnaire-Revised (CIQ-R). Melbourne, Australia: Summer Foundation Ltd; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Callaway L, Winkler D, Tippett A, et al. The community integration questionnaire-revised: Australian normative data and measurement of electronic social networking. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63:143–153.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Migliorini C, Enticott J, Callaway L, et al. Community integration questionnaire: outcomes of people with traumatic brain injury and high support needs compared with multiple matched controls. Brain Inj. 2016;30:1201–1207.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander A, Fuchs KL, High WM Jr, et al. The community integration questionnaire revisited: an assessment of factor structure and validity. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1303–1308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hirsh A, Braden A, Craggs J, et al. Psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire in a heterogeneous sample of adults with physical disability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1602–1611.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Kreutzer JS, Rosenthal P, et al. A multicenter longitudinal investigation of return to work and community integration following traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1996;11:70–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Smith-Knapp K, Granger C. Outcomes in the first 5 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:298–305.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin HS, O’Donnell VM, Grossman RG. The galveston orientation and amnesia test: a practical scale to assess cognition after head injury. J Nerv Men Dis. 1979;167:675–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMillan TM, Jongen ELM, Greenwood RJ. Assessment of post-traumatic amnesia after severe closed head injury: retrospective or prospective? J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1996;60:422–427.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein SC. Classification of head injury. In: Narayan RK, Povlishock JT, Wilberger JE Jr, editors. Neurotrauma. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Nakase-Richardson R, Sepehri A, Sherer M. Classification schema of posttraumatic amnesia duration-based injury severity relative to 1-year outcome: analysis of individuals with moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:17–19.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corrigan JD, Deming R. Psychometric characteristics of the Community Integration Questionnaire: replication and extension. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1995;10:41–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fortune DG, Walsh RS, Richards HL. Cognitive reserve and preinjury educational attainment: effects on outcome. Of Community-Based Rehabilitation for Longer-Term Individuals with Acquired Brain Injury. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39:234–239.
   Google Scholar
• Kratz A, Chadd E, Jensen M, et al. An examination of the psychometric properties of the community integration questionnaire (CIQ) in spinal cord injury. J Spinal Cord Med. 2015;38:446–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomaszewski R, Mitrushina M. Utility of the community integration questionnaire in a sample of adults with neurological and neuropsychiatric disorders receiving prevocational training. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38: 1016–1022.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaccaro M, Hart T, Whyte J, et al. Internet use and interest among individuals with traumatic brain injury: a consumer survey. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;2:85–95.
   Google Scholar
• Tsaousides T, Matsuzawa Y, Lebowitz M. Familiarity and prevalence of Facebook use for social networking among individuals with traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2011;25:1155–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Publications Office of the European Union. Being young in Europe today. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Statistical Yearbook of the Republic of Croatia 2016 [Internet]. Available from: www.dzs.hr/Hrv_Eng/ljetopis/2016/sljh2016.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Hart T, Whyte J, Polansky M, et al. Community outcomes following traumatic brain injury. Impact of race and preinjury status. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2005;20:158–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paniak C, Philips K, Toller-Lobe G, et al. Sensitivity of three recent questionnaires to mild traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1999;14:211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steiner E, Murg-Argeny M, Steltzer H. The severe traumatic brain injury in Austria: early rehabilitative treatment and outcome. J Trauma Manage Outcomes. 2016;10:5.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stalnacke BM. Community integration, social support and life satisfaction in relation to symptoms 3 years after mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2007;21:933–942.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall KM, Bushnik T, Lakisic-Kazacic B, et al. Assessing traumatic brain injury outcome measures for long-term follow-up of community-based individuals. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:367–374.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dijkers M. Measuring the long-term outcomes of traumatic brain injury: a review of the Community Integration Questionnaire. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1997;12:74–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedland D, Swash M. Post-traumatic amnesia and confusional state: hazards of retrospective assessment. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2016;87:1068–1074.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts CM, Spitz G, Ponsford J. Comparing prospectively recorded posttraumatic amnesia duration with retrospective accounts. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2016;31:E71–E77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colantonio A, Dawson DR, McLellan BA. Head injury in young adults: long-term outcome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1998;79:550–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teasdale G, Jennett B. Assessment of coma and impaired consciousness. A practical scale. Lancet. 1974;2:81–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felmingham KL, Baguley IJ, Crooks J. A comparison of acute and postdischarge predictors of employment 2 years after traumatic brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;82:435–439.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandhaug M, Andelic N, Langhammer B, et al. Community integration 2 years after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury. Brain Inj. 2015;29:915–920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willemse-van Son AH, Ribbers GM, Verhagen AP, et al. Prognostic factors of long-term functioning and productivity after traumatic brain injury: a systematic review of prospective cohort studies. Clin Rehabil. 2007;21:1024–1037.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sander AM, Seel RT, Kreutzer JS, et al. Agreement between persons with traumatic brain injury and their relatives regarding psychosocial outcome using the Community Integration Questionnaire. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1997;78:353–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roozenbeek B, Maas AIR, Menon DK. Changing patterns in the epidemiology of traumatic brain injury. Nat Rev Neurol. 2013;9:231–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar