Employer attitudes toward hiring persons with disabilities in Armenia

References

• World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: short version. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• United Nations, 2006. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Treaty Series, 2515,3 [cited 2017 Sep 5]. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/pagesViewetails.aspx?src=IND&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&clang=_en
   Google Scholar
• Dutta A, Gervey R, Chan F, et al. Understanding employers hiring intentions in relation to qualified workers with disabilities: a United States study. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;18:326–334.
   Google Scholar
• Shah S, Priestley M. Disability and social change. Bristol, UK: Polity Press; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. Fundamental principles of disability. Union of the Physically Impaired Against Segregation. London (UK): 2005 [cited 2017 Jun 5]. Available from: http://disability-studies.leeds.ac.uk/files/library/UPIAS-fundamental-principles.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Osipov V. Employment of people with disabilities in Armenia: needs and barriers. 2013. Yerevan (Armenia): International Organization for Migration Mission in Armenia.
   Google Scholar
• Save the Children International – LIFE Program. Assessment of Successes and Challenges of Projects Implemented for People with Disabilities in Armenia. Yerevan, Armenia. 2012: Save the Children International. [cited 2017 Jun 5]. Available from: https://armenia.savethechildren.net/sites/armenia.savethechildren.net/files/library/Report_PWD%20employment%20Armenia_Eng.pdf
   Google Scholar
• State Employment Agency. Unemployment. Yerevan, Armenia: Ministry of Labor and Social Issues of the Republic of Armenia; 2017 [cited 2017 Jun 5]. Available from: http://employment.am/en/38/free.html
   Google Scholar
• Antonak R. Development and psychometric analysis of the Scale of Attitudes Toward Disabled Persons. J Appl Rehabil Couns 1982;13:22–29.
   Google Scholar
• Louvet E, Rohmer O, Dubois N. Social judgment of people with a disability in the workplace: how to make. a Good Impression on Employers. Swiss J Psych. 2009;68:153–159.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copeland J, Chan F, Bezyak J, et al. Assessing cognitive and affective reactions of employers toward people with disabilities in the workplace. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:427–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vornholt K, Uitdewilligen S, Nijhuis J. Factors affecting the acceptance of people with disabilities at work: A literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2013; 23:463–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eagly A, Chaiken S. The psychology of attitudes. Fort Worth (TX): Harcourt, Brace and Jovanovich; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Findler L, Vichinsky N, Werner S. The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities (MAS): Construction and validation. Rehabilitation Counseling Bulletin. 2007; 50:166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antonak R, Livneh H. Measurement of attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2000;22:211–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hernandez B, Keys C, Balcazar F. Employer attitudes toward workers with disabilities and their ADA employment rights: A literature review. Journal of Psychology 2000;66:4–16.
   Google Scholar
• Yuker H, Block J, Younng J. The measurement of attitudes toward disabled persons. Albertson (NY): Insurance Company of North America; 1970.
   Google Scholar
• Domzal C, Houtenville A, Sharma R. Survey of employer perspectives on the employment of people with disabilities: technical report. McLean (VA): US Dept of Labor; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Nota L, Santilli S, Ginevra M, et al. Employer attitudes towards the work inclusion of people with disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2014;27:511–520.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louvet E. Social judgment toward job applicants with disabilities: perception of personal qualities and competences. Rehab Psych. 2007;52:297–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pasmore W. Action research in the workplace: the socio-technical perspective. In: Reason P, Bradbury H, editors. Handbook of action research: participative inquiry and practice, 3rd ed. London (UK): Sage; 2001. p. 38–47.
   Google Scholar
• Minkler M, Wallerstein N, editors. Community-based participatory research for health: from process to outcomes. 2nd ed. 2008. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Breen J. On-demand American Sign Language interpreting services: social policy development in the Yukon. Sign Lang Stud. 2015;15:348–361.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas C. How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disabil Soc. 2004;19:569–583.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stone D, Colella A. A model of factors affecting the treatment of disabled individuals in organizations. Acad Manage Rev 1996;21:352–401.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Findler L, Vichinsky N, Werner S. The multidimensional attitudes scale toward persons with disabilities (MAS): construction and validation. Rehabil Couns Bull 2007;50:166–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark L, Watson D. Constructing validity: basic issues in objective scale development. Psych Assess. 1995;7:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Popovich P, Scherbaum C, Scherbaum K, et al. The assessment of attitudes toward individuals with disabilities in the workplace. J Psych. 2003;137:163–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson K, Wauson J. The AMA handbook of business writing. New York (NY): American Management Association; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Brislin R. Back-translation for cross-cultural research. J Cross-Cult Psych. 1970;1:185–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeVellis R. Scale development. 4th ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Simms L. Classical and modern methods of psychological scale construction. Social Pers Psych Compass. 2008;2:414–433.
   Google Scholar
• Penfield R. Item analysis. In: Geisinger K, editor. APA handbook of testing and assessment in psychology: Vol. 1. Test theory and assessment in industrial and organizational psychology. Washington (DC): American Psychological Association; 2013. p. 121–138.
   Google Scholar
• Chan F, Strausser D, Maher D, et al. Demand-side factors related to employment of people with disabilities: a survey of employers in the Midwest region of the United States. J Occup Rehabil. 2010;20:412–419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr R, Bacharach V. Psychometrics: An introduction. 2nd ed. Los Angeles (CA): Sage. 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Beck C, Gable R. Ensuring content validity: an illustration of the process. J Nurs Meas. 2001;9:201–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Parsons T. Illness and the role of the physician: A sociological perspective. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 1951;21:452–460.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliver M, Barnes C. The new politics of disablement. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick M. Dangerous discourses of disability, subjectivity and sexuality. Hampshire (UK): Palgrave MacMillan; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Beaudry J-B. Beyond (models of) disability? Jmphil. 2016;41:210–228.
   Google Scholar
• Gething L, Wheeler L. The interaction with disabled persons scale: a new Australian instrument to measure attitudes towards people with disabilities. Aust J Psych. 1991;44:75–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuo P-J, Kalargyrou V. Consumers’ perspectives on service staff with disabilities in the hospitality industry. Int J Contemp Hospitality Mngt. 2014;26:164–182.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynn M. Determination and quantification of content validity. Nurs Res. 1986;35:382–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grant J, Davis L. Selection and use of content experts for instrument development. Res Nurs Health. 1997;20:269–274.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar