Engaging older adults in discharge planning: case studies illuminating approaches adopted by family members that promote relational autonomy

References

• Bull M, Roberts J. Components of a proper hospital discharge for elders. J Adv Nurs. 2001;35:571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummings S, Cockerham C. Ethical dilemmas in discharge planning for patients with Alzheimer's disease. Health Soc Work. 1997;22:101–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dill A. The ethics of discharge planning for older adults: an ethnographic analysis. Soc Sci Med. 1995;41:1289–1299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rydeman I, Törnkvist L. The patient’s vulnerability, dependence and exposed situation in the discharge process: experiences of district nurses, geriatric nurses and social workers. J Clin Nurs. 2006;15:1299–1307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullough L, Wilson N, Teasdale T, et al. Mapping personal, familial, and professional values in long-term care decisions . Gerontologist. 1993;33:324–332.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moats G. Discharge decision-making with older people: the influence of the institutional environment. Aust Occ Ther J. 2006;53:107–116.
   Google Scholar
• Potthoff S, Kane R, Franco S. Improving hospital discharge planning for elderly patients. Health Care Financ Rev. 1997;19:47–72.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis A, Thorns D. Meanings of home for older home owners. Housing Studies. 1996;11:485–501.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dupuis A, Thorns D. Home, home ownership and the search for ontological security. Sociol Rev. 1998;46:24–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wise J. Home: territory and identity. Cultural Studies. 2000;14:295–310.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huby G, Stewart J, Tierney A, et al. Planning older people’s discharge from acute hospital care: linking risk management and patient participation in decision-making. Health Risk Soc. 2004;6:115–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher E. Discharge planning with older adults: the influence of social and political systems and contexts [Doctoral dissertation]. Toronto (ON): University of Toronto; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Rappolt S, Gibson BE. Mediators of older adults’ marginalization in discharge planning. Ageing Soc. 2017; 37:1747–1769.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durocher E, Gibson BE, Rappolt S. Rehabilitation as destination triage: a critical examination of how in discharge planning may be impeding rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1271–1278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foss C, Hofoss D. Elderly persons’ experiences of participation in hospital discharge process. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:68–73.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LeClerc M, Wells D, Craig D, et al. Falling short of the mark: tales of life after hospital discharge. Clin Nurs Res. 2002;11:242–260.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Merriman M. Pre-hospital discharge planning: empowering elderly patients through choice. Crit Care Nurs. 2008;31:52–58.
   Google Scholar
• Moats G. Discharge decision-making, enabling occupations, and client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2007;74:91–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beauchamp TL, Childress JF. Principles of biomedical ethics. 7th ed. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds S. Choices and control in feminist bioethics. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 213–235.
   Google Scholar
• Ho A. Relational autonomy or undue pressure? Family’s role in medical decision-making. Scand J Caring Sci. 2008;22:128–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ho A. The individualist model of autonomy and the challenge of disability. Bioethical Inquiry. 2008;5:193–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLeod C, Sherwin S. Relational autonomy, self-trust, and healthcare for patients who are oppressed. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 259–279.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin S. The politics of women?s health: exploring agency and autonomy. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 1998. Chapter 2, A relational approach to autonomy in healthcare; p. 19–47.
   Google Scholar
• Sherwin S, Winsby M. A relational perspective on autonomy for older adults residing in nursing homes. Health Expect. 2011;14:182–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C. Relational autonomy, normative authority and perfectionism. J Soc Philos. 2008;39:512–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackenzie C, Stoljar N. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. Introduction: autonomy refigured; p. 3–34
   Google Scholar
• Butler N. Dispelling ageism: the cross-cutting intervention. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci. 1989;503:138–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler N. Combating ageism. Int Psychogeriatr. 2009;21:211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson T. Ageism: prejudice against our feared future self. J Social Issues. 2005;61:207–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hedgecoe A. Critical bioethics: beyond the social science critique of applied ethics. Bioethics. 2004;18:120–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Twine R. Broadening the feminism in feminist bioethics. In: Scully J, Baldwin-Ragaven L, Fitzpatrick P, editors. Feminist bioethics: at the centre, on the margins. Baltimore (MA): Johns Hopkins University Press; 2010. p. 45–59.
   Google Scholar
• Willis J. Foundations of qualitative research: interpretive and critical approaches. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam S. Case study research in education: a qualitative approach. San Francisco (CA): Jossey-Bass; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Dierckx de Casterle B, Gastmans C, Bryon E, et al. QUAGOL: a guide for qualitative data analysis. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49:360–371.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy SJ. Qualitative quality: eight “big-tent” criteria for excellent qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry. 2010;16:837–851.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miles M, Huberman M, Saldaña J. Qualitative data analysis. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Geertz C. The interpretation of cultures: selected essays. New York (NY): Basic Books; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Purtilo R. Ethical dimensions in the health professions. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania: W.B. Saunders Company; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Kant I. Fundamental principles of the metaphysics of morals [Internet]. 1785 [cited 2018 Mar 29]. Available from: https://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/k/kant/immanuel/k16prm/index.html.
   Google Scholar
• Mill JS. On liberty [Internet]. 1909 [cited 2018 Mar 29]. Available from: http://ebooks.adelaide.edu.au/m/mill/john_stuart/m645o/.
   Google Scholar
• Entwistle V, Carter S, Cribb A, et al. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinician-patient relationships. J Gen Intern Med. 2010;25:741–745.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barclay L. Autonomy and the social self. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 52–71.
   Google Scholar
• Donchin A. Autonomy and interdependence: quandaries in genetic decision-making. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 236–258.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman M. Autonomy, social disruption and women. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy: feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 35–51.
   Google Scholar
• Held V. Feminist transformations of moral theory. Philos Phenomenol Res. 1990;50:321–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baier A. Postures of the mind: Essays on mind and morals. Minneapolis (MS): University of Minnesota Press; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Held V. Non-contractual society: a feminist view. Can J Philos Supp. 1987;17:111–137.
   Google Scholar
• Meyers D. Personal autonomy and the paradox of feminine socialization. J Philos. 1987;84:619–628.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwin S. Whither bioethics?: how feminism can help reorient bioethics. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2008;1:7–27.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Healthcare Consent Act. S.O. 1996, c. 2,Sch [Internet]. 1996 [cited 2008 Dec 9]. Available from http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_96h02_e.htm#BK4
   Google Scholar
• Weisstub D. Enquiry on mental competency: final report. Toronto (ON): Osgoode Hall; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Australia Physiotherapy Association. Standards for physiotherapy practice [Internet]. 2011 [cited 2018 Mar 29]. Available from: http://www.physiotherapy.asn.au/documentsfolder/resources_private_practice_standards_for_physiotherapy_practices_2011.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Medicine Committee on Quality of Health Care. Crossing the quality chasm: a new health system for the 21st century. Washington (DC): National Academies Press; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Law MH, Polatajko S, Baptiste E, et al. Core concepts of occupational therapy. In: Townsend E, editor. Enabling occupation: an occupational therapy perspective. Ottawa (ON): CAOT Publications ACE; 1997. p. 29–56.
   Google Scholar
• Mayo Clinic. Vision and mission [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Mar 9]. Available from: http://www.mayo.edu/mms/about/mission.
   Google Scholar
• Stewart R, Bartlett P, Harwood R. Mental capacity assessments and discharge decisions. Age Ageing. 2005;34:549–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumsion T. Client-centered practice in occupational therapy: a guide to implementation. Toronto (ON): Churchill Livingstone; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. People at the centre of care [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2018 Mar 9]. Available from: http://www.wpro.who.int/health_services/people_at_the_centre_of_care/definition/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Ells C, Hunt M, Chambers-Evans J. Relational autonomy as an essential component of patient-centered care. Int J Fem Approaches Bioeth. 2011;4:79–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clouston T. Whose occupational balance is it anyway? The challenge of neoliberal capitalism and work-life imbalance. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77:507–515.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey H. Living tensions: reconstructing notions of professionalism in occupational therapy. Aust Occup Ther J. 2014;61:168–176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar