The acceptance and commitment therapy model in occupational rehabilitation of musculoskeletal and common mental disorders: a qualitative focus group study

References

• Wittchen HU, Jacobi F, Rehm J, et al. The size and burden of mental disorders and other disorders of the brain in Europe 2010. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2011;21:655–679.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rai D, Skapinakis P, Wiles N, et al. Common mental disorders, subthreshold symptoms and disability: longitudinal study. Br J Psychiatry. 2010;197:411–412.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambeek LC, van Tulder MW, Swinkels IC, et al. The trend in total cost of back pain in The Netherlands in the period 2002–2007. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:1050–1058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barnett K, Mercer SW, Norbury M, et al. Epidemiology of multimorbidity and implications for health care, research, and medical education: a cross-sectional study. Lancet. 2012;380:37–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van, et al. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;8:CD001822.
   Google Scholar
• Jensen C, Jensen OK, Christiansen DH, et al. One-year follow-up in employees sick-listed because of low back pain: randomized clinical trial comparing multidisciplinary and brief intervention. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011;36:1180–1189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buijs PC, Lambeek LC, Koppenrade V, et al. Can workers with chronic back pain shift from pain elimination to function restore at work? Qualitative evaluation of an innovative work related multidisciplinary programme. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil. 2009;22:65–73.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hagen EM, Eriksen HR, Ursin H. Does early intervention with a light mobilization program reduce long-term sick leave for low back pain? Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:1973–1976.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reme SE, Tveito TH, Harris A, et al. Cognitive interventions and nutritional supplements (the CINS trial): a randomized controlled multicentre trial comparing a brief intervention with additional cognitive behavioural therapy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2016;41:1557–1564. Publish Ahead of Print.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vermeulen SJ, Anema JR, Schellart AJ, et al. A participatory return-to-work intervention for temporary agency workers and unemployed workers sick-listed due to musculoskeletal disorders: results of a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:313–324.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Rhenen W, Blonk RW, Schaufeli WB, et al. Can sickness absence be reduced by stress reduction programs: on the effectiveness of two approaches. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2007;80:505–515.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stenlund T, Ahlgren C, Lindahl B, et al. Cognitively oriented behavioral rehabilitation in combination with Qigong for patients on long-term sick leave because of burnout: REST–a randomized clinical trial. Int J Behav Med. 2009;16:294–303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Netterstrom B, Bech P. Effect of a multidisciplinary stress treatment programme on the return to work rate for persons with work-related stress. A non-randomized controlled study from a stress clinic. Bmc Public Health. 2010;10:658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Oostrom SH, Driessen MT, et al. Workplace interventions for preventing work disability. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;(2):CD006955.
   Google Scholar
• de Vente W, Kamphuis JH, Emmelkamp PM, et al. Individual and group cognitive-behavioral treatment for work-related stress complaints and sickness absence: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Health Psychol. 2008;13:214–231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lagerveld SE, Blonk RW, Brenninkmeijer V, et al. Work-focused treatment of common mental disorders and return to work: a comparative outcome study. J Occup Health Psychol. 2012;17:220–234.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reme SE, Grasdal AL, Lovvik C, et al. Work-focused cognitive-behavioural therapy and individual job support to increase work participation in common mental disorders: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72:745–752.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reme SE, Tangen T, Moe T, et al. Prevalence of psychiatric disorders in sick listed chronic low back pain patients. Eur J Pain. 2011;15:1075–1080.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Durand MJ, Berthelette D, et al. Disability prevention - new paradigm for the management of occupational back pain. Dis Manag Health Outcomes. 2001;9:351–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahl KG, Winter L, Schweiger U. The third wave of cognitive behavioural therapies: what is new and what is effective? Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2012;25:522–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Villatte M, Levin M, et al. Open, aware, and active: contextual approaches as an emerging trend in the behavioral and cognitive therapies. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. 2011;7:141–168.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Levin ME, Plumb-Vilardaga J, et al. Acceptance and commitment therapy and contextual behavioral science: examining the progress of a distinctive model of behavioral and cognitive therapy. Behav Ther. 2013;44:180–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen C. Acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT): a third wave behaviour therapy. Behav Cognit Psychother. 2008;36:667–673.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Powers MB, Zum Vorde Sive Vording MB, Emmelkamp PM. Acceptance and commitment therapy: a meta-analytic review. Psychother Psychosom. 2009;78:73–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• A-Tjak JG, Davis ML, Morina N, et al. A meta-analysis of the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy for clinically relevant mental and physical health problems. Psychother Psychosom. 2015;84:30–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ost LG. The efficacy of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. Behav Res Ther. 2014;61:105–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hann KEJ, McCracken LM. A systematic review of randomized controlled trials of Acceptance and Commitment Therapy for adults with chronic pain: outcome domains, design quality, and efficacy. J Contextual Behav Sci. 2014;3:217–227.
   Google Scholar
• Dahl J, Wilson KG, Nilsson A. Acceptance and commitment therapy and the treatment of persons at risk for long-term disability resulting from stress and pain symptoms: a preliminary randomized trial. Behav Ther. 2004;35:785–801.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fimland MS, Vasseljen O, Gismervik S, et al. Occupational rehabilitation programs for musculoskeletal pain and common mental health disorders: study protocol of a randomized controlled trial. Bmc Public Health. 2014;14:9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, et al. Effects of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on somatic and mental health: secondary outcomes of a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;27:456–466.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, et al. Effect of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on sickness absence in persons with musculoskeletal- or mental health disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;28:170–179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lytsy P, Carlsson L, Anderzen I. Effectiveness of two vocational rehabilitation programmes in women with long-term sick leave due to pain syndrome or mental illness: 1-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:170–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnes A, Ghaderi A, Dahl J, et al. Randomized controlled trial of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Health Psychol. 2017. DOI:10.1037/ocp0000097
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finnes A, Enebrink P, Sampaio F, et al. Cost-effectiveness of acceptance and commitment therapy and a workplace intervention for employees on sickness absence due to mental disorders. J Occup Environ Med. 2017;59:1211–1220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara KW, Borchgrevink PC, Jacobsen HB, et al. Transdiagnostic group-based occupational rehabilitation for participants with chronic pain, chronic fatigue and common mental disorders. A feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;1–11. DOI:10.1080/09638288.2017.1339298
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rise MB, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, et al. Sick-listed persons’ experiences with taking part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program based on Acceptance and Commitment Therapy: a qualitative focus group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Snelgrove S, Liossi C. Living with chronic low back pain: a metasynthesis of qualitative research. Chronic Illn. 2013;9:283–301.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• MacEachen E, Clarke J, Franche RL, et al. Systematic review of the qualitative literature on return to work after injury. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2006;32:257–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen MF, Nielsen KM, Brinkmann S. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on return to work among employees with common mental disorders. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38:93–104.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathias B, Parry-Jones B, Huws JC. Individual experiences of an acceptance-based pain management programme: an interpretative phenomenological analysis. Psychol Health. 2014;29:279–296.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacon T, Farhall J, Fossey E. The active therapeutic processes of acceptance and commitment therapy for persistent symptoms of psychosis: clients’ perspectives. Behav Cogn Psychother. 2014;42:402–420.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barker E, McCracken LM. From traditional cognitive-behavioural therapy to acceptance and commitment therapy for chronic pain: a mixed-methods study of staff experiences of change. Br J Pain. 2014;8:98–106.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wardley MN, Flaxman PE, Willig C, et al. ‘Feel the Feeling’: psychological practitioners’ experience of acceptance and commitment therapy well-being training in the workplace. J Health Psychol. 2014; 21:1536–1547.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams J, Vaughan F, Huws J, et al. Brain injury spousal caregivers’ experiences of an acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) group. Soc Care Neurodisabil. 2014;5:29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Linehan MM. Cognitive-behavioral treatment of borderline personality disorder. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Segal ZV, Williams M, Teasdale JD. Mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for depression: a new approach to preventing relapse. New York (NY): Guilford Press; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Wells A. Emotional disorders and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Beck AT. Cognitive therapy: past, present, and future. J Consult Clin Psychol. 1993;61:194–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes SC, Strosahl K, Wilson K. Acceptance and commitment therapy 2nd edition: the process and practice of mindful change. 2nd ed. New York (NY): The Guilford Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Strosahl K, Robinson P, Gustavsson T. Brief interventions for radical change: principles and practice of focused acceptance and commitment therapy: Oakland (CA): New Harbinger Publications Inc.; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Wilson K. Mindfulness for two: an acceptance and commitment therapy approach to mindfulness in psychotherapy: Oakland (CA): New Harbinger Publications; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kitzinger J. Qualitative research. Introducing focus groups. BMJ. 1995;311:299–302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giorgi A. The descriptive phenomenological method in psychology: a modified Husserlian approach. Pittsburgh (PA): Duquesne University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Massey OT. A proposed model for the analysis and interpretation of focus groups in evaluation research. Eval Program Plann. 2011;34:21–28.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19:349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fung K. Acceptance and commitment therapy: western adoption of Buddhist tenets? Transcult Psychiatry. 2015;52:561–576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diller JW, Lattal KA. Radical behaviorism and Buddhism: complementarities and conflicts. Behav Anal. 2008;31:163–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yu L, McCracken LM. Model and processes of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT) for chronic pain including a closer look at the self. Curr Pain Headache Rep. 2016;20:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugli L, Maeland S, Magnussen LH. What facilitates return to work? Patients’ experiences 3 years after occupational rehabilitation. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:573–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haugstvedt KT, Hallberg U, Graff-Iversen S, et al. Increased self-awareness in the process of returning to work. Scand J Caring Sci. 2011;25:762–770.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen GL, Garcia J, Apfel N, et al. Reducing the racial achievement gap: a social-psychological intervention. Science. 2006;313:1307–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake A, Kost-Smith LE, Finkelstein ND, et al. Reducing the gender achievement gap in college science: a classroom study of values affirmation. Science. 2010;330:1234–1237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Return to work: promoting health and productivity in workers with common mental disorders (SAFARI) [Internet]. Stockholm, Sweden: Karolinska Institutet; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Mental health and work: Norway: OECD Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Ivanoff SD, Hultberg J. Understanding the multiple realities of everyday life: basic assumptions in focus-group methodology. Scand J Occup Ther. 2006;13:125–132.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar