References
- Bellamy G, Croot L, Bush A, et al. A study to define profound and multiple learning disability (PMLD). J Intellect Disabil. 2010;14:221–235.
- Parrott R, Tillet N, Wostenholme J. Demand for services: changes in demography and demand for services from people with complex needs and profound and multiple learning disabilities. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev. 2008;13:26–34.
- Emerson E, Roberts J, Whelton B. Commissioning person-centred, cost effective local support for people with learning. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev. 2009;14:49–51.
- Department of Health (DoH). (2009). Valuing people now: a new three-year strategy for people with learning disabilities. In: HMSO (ed.). London, UK.
- Mansell J. Raising our sights: services for adults with profound intellectual and multiple disabilities. Tizard Learn Disabil Rev. 2010;15:5–12.
- Goldbart J, Caton S. (2010). Communication and people with the most complex needs: what works and why this is essential. Mencap, UK.
- Nind M, Hewett D. Interaction as curriculum. Br J Special Educ. 2007;15:55–57.
- Nind M. Efficacy of Intensive Interaction: developing sociability and communication in people with severe and complex learning difficulties using an approach based on care-giver infant interaction. Eur J Special Needs Educ. 1996;11:48–66.
- Leaning B, Watson T. From the inside looking out – an intensive interaction group for people with profound and multiple learning disabilities. Br J Learn Disab. 2006;34:103–109.
- Elgie S, Maguire N. Intensive Interaction with a woman with multiple and profound disabilities: a case study. Tizard Learn Disab Rev. 2001;6:18–24.
- Firth G, Elford H, Leeming C, et al. Intensive interaction as a novel approach in social care: care staff’s views on the practice change process. J Appl Res Int Dis. 2008;21:58–69.
- Samuel J, Nind M, Volans A, et al. An evaluation of intensive interaction in community living settings for adults with profound intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil. 2008;12:111–126.
- Suzanne Zeedyk M, Davies C, Parry S, et al. Fostering social engagement in Romanian children with communicative impairments: the experiences of newly trained practitioners of intensive interaction. Br J Learn Disabil. 2009;37:186–196.
- Rayner K, Bradley S, Johnson G, et al. Teaching intensive interaction to paid carers: using the ‘communities of practice’ model to inform training. Br J Learn Disabil. 2016;44:63–70.
- Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis (IPA): theory, mind and research. London (UK): Sage; 2009.
- Firth G. A dual aspect process model of intensive interaction. Br J Learn Disabil. 2008;37:43–49.
- Hutchinson N, Bodicoat A. The effectiveness of intensive interaction, a systematic review. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2015;28:437–454.
- Georgiade N, Phillimore L. (1975). The myth of the hero-innovator and alternative strategies for organisational change. In Kiernan, C.C., & Woodford, F.P. (eds). Behaviour modification with the severely retarded. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Associated Scientific Publishers.
- Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
- Ritchie J, Smith J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. London (UK): Sage; 2003.