398
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Questionnaires for knee instability assessment in people with anterior cruciate ligament injury: a systematic review of original questionnaires and their translated versions

ORCID Icon, , , &
Pages 173-182 | Received 07 Nov 2017, Accepted 29 Jun 2018, Published online: 11 Dec 2018

References

  • Kaeding CC, Leger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA. Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36:1–8.
  • Rothenberg P, Grau L, Kaplan L, et al. Knee injuries in American football: an epidemiological review. Am J Orthop. 2016;45:368–373.
  • Stewart BA, Momaya AM, Silverstein MD, et al. The cost-effectiveness of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in competitive athletes. Am J Sports Med. 2017;45:23–33.
  • Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, et al. Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2000;8:141–150.
  • Mehran N, Photopoulos CD, Narvy SJ, et al. Epidemiology of operative procedures in an NCAA division I football team over 10 seasons. Orthop J Sports Med. 2016;4:2325967116657530.
  • Konrads C, Reppenhagen S, Belder D, et al. Long-term outcome of anterior cruciate ligament tear without reconstruction: a longitudinal prospective study. Int Orthop. 2016;40:2325–2330.
  • Gupta R, Masih GD, Chander G, et al. Delay in surgery predisposes to meniscal and chondral injuries in anterior cruciate ligament deficient knees. Indian J Orthop. 2016;50:492–498.
  • Wylie JD, Marchand LS, Burks RT. Etiologic factors that lead to failure after primary anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Clin Sports Med. 2017;36:155–172.
  • Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C. Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport. 2008;9:9–15.
  • Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR, McCloskey JW. Rigorous statistical reliability, validity, and responsiveness testing of the Cincinnati knee rating system in 350 subjects with uninjured, injured, or anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees. Am J Sports Med. 1999;27:402–416.
  • Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, et al. Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:3186–3191.
  • Beaton DE, Schemitsch E. Measures of health-related quality of life and physical function. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;413:90–105.
  • Marx RG. Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy. 2003;19:1103–1108.
  • Laboute E, Savalli L, Puig PL, et al. Validity and reproducibility of the PPLP scoring scale in the follow-up of athletes after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;53:162–179.
  • Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, et al. Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med. 2001;29:600–613.
  • Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60:34–42.
  • Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, et al. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) subjective knee evaluation form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63:S208–S228.
  • Nunes G, Castro LV, de Wageck B, et al. Translation into Portuguese of questionnaires to assess knee injuries. Acta Ortop Bras. 2013;21:288–294.
  • Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:264–269.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN study reached international consensus on taxonomy, terminology, and definitions of measurement properties for health-related patient-reported outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2010;63:737–745.
  • Terwee CB, Mokkink LB, Knol DL, et al. Rating the methodological quality in systematic reviews of studies on measurement properties: a scoring system for the COSMIN checklist. Qual Life Res. 2012;21:651–657.
  • Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. COSMIN checklist manual. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: EMGO Institute for Health and Care Research; 2012.
  • Hoher J, Munster A, Klein J, et al. Validation and application of a subjective knee questionnaire. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1995;3:26–33.
  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)-development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 1998;28:88–96.
  • Peccin MS, Ciconelli R, Cohen M. Questionário específico para sintomas do joelho “Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale”: tradução e validação para a língua Portuguesa. Acta Ortop Bras. 2006;14:268–272.
  • Bizzini M, Gorelick M. Development of a German version of the knee outcome survey for daily activities. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2007;127:781–789.
  • Nigri PZ, Peccin MS, Almeida GJ, de M, et al. Tradução, validação e adaptação cultural da escala de atividade de vida diária. Acta Ortop Bras. 2007;15:101–104.
  • Goncalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee Outcome Survey-Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADLS). Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1445–1449.
  • Blonna D, Castoldi F, Delicio D, et al. Validity and reliability of the SPORTS score. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2012;20:356–360.
  • Almangoush A, Herrington L, Attia I, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, internal consistency and validation of the Arabic version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS) for Egyptian people with knee injuries. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2013;21:1855–1864.
  • Celik D, Coşkunsu D, Kiliçoğlu O. Translation and cultural adaptation of the Turkish Lysholm knee scale: ease of use, validity, and reliability. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471:2602–2610.
  • Comins JD, Krogsgaard MR, Kreiner S, et al. Dimensionality of the Knee Numeric-Entity Evaluation Score (KNEES-ACL): a condition-specific questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2013;23:e302–e312.
  • Kim JG, Ha JK, Lee JY, et al. Translation and validation of the Korean version of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Knee Surg Relat Res. 2013;25:106–111.
  • Paradowski PT, Witoński D, Kęska R, et al. Cross-cultural translation and measurement properties of the Polish version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2013;11:107.
  • Çelik D, Coşkunsu D, KiliÇoğlu Ö, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form into Turkish. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44:899–909.
  • Padua R, Bondi R, Ceccarelli E, et al. Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy. 2004;20:819–823.
  • de Groot IB, Favejee MM, Reijman M, et al. The Dutch version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score: a validation study. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2008;6:16.
  • Wang W, Liu L, Chang X, et al. Cross-cultural translation of the Lysholm knee score in Chinese and its validation in patients with anterior cruciate ligament injury. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2016;17:436.
  • Eshuis R, Lentjes GW, Tegner Y, et al. Dutch translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the lysholm score and tegner activity scale for patients with anterior cruciate ligament injuries. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2016;46:976–983.
  • Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, et al. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: validity and reproducibility. Am J Sports Med. 2010;38:1894–1899.
  • Lysholm J, Gillquist J. Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med. 1982;10:150–154.
  • Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, Breugem SJ, et al. Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med. 2006;34:1680–1684.
  • Ornetti P, Parratte S, Gossec L, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) in knee osteoarthritis patients. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2008;16:423–428.
  • Goncalves RS, Cabri J, Pinheiro JP, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Portuguese version of the Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Osteoarthr Cartil. 2009;17:1156–1162.
  • Irrgang JJ, Snyder-Mackler L, Wainner RS, et al. Development of a patient-reported measure of function of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1998;80:1132–1145.
  • Seo SS, Chung KC, Kim YB. Assessment of validity, reliability and responsiveness of Korean Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score(KOOS) for the knee injury. J Korean Orthop Assoc. 2006;41:441–453.
  • Monticone M, Ferrante S, Salvaderi S, et al. Development of the Italian version of the knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score for patients with knee injuries: cross-cultural adaptation, dimensionality, reliability, and validity. Osteoarthr Cartil. 2012;20:330–335.
  • Roos EM, Roos HP, Ekdahl C, et al. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) – validation of a Swedish version. Scand J Med Sci Sport. 2007;8:439.
  • Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D. Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines. J Clin Epidemiol. 1993;46:1417–1432.
  • Ware JEJ, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;2:98–483.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.