359
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

The reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the oxford shoulder instability score

, &
Pages 261-266 | Received 06 Nov 2017, Accepted 03 Jul 2018, Published online: 16 Oct 2018

References

  • Fitzpatrick R, Fletcher A, Gore S, et al. Quality of life measures in health care. I: Applications and issues in assessment. BMJ. 1992;305:1074–1077.
  • Testa MA, Simonson DC. Assessment of quality-of-life outcomes. N Engl J Med. 1996;334:835–840.
  • Patrick D, Guyatt G, Acquadro C. Patient-reported outcomes. In: J Higgens and S Green, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons; 2008. p. 531–545.
  • Robinson CM, Howes J, Murdoch H, et al. Functional outcome and risk of recurrent instability after primary traumatic anterior shoulder dislocation in young patients. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88:2326–2336.
  • Leroux T, Ogilvie-Harris D, Veillette C, et al. The epidemiology of primary anterior shoulder dislocations in patients aged 10 to 16 years. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43:2111–2117.
  • Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Carr A. The assessment of shoulder instability. The development and validation of a questionnaire. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81:420–426.
  • Olyaei G, Mousavi S, Montazeri A, et al. Translation and Validation Study of the Persian Version of the Oxford Shoulder Instability Score. J Modern Rehabil. 2016;10:23–27.
  • van der Linde JA, van Kampen DA, van Beers LW, et al. The Oxford Shoulder Instability Score; validation in Dutch and first-time assessment of its smallest detectable change. J Orthop Surg Res. 2015;10:146.
  • Gerber C, Nyffeler RW. Classification of glenohumeral joint instability. Clin Orthop Related Res. 2002;400:65–76.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR task force for translation and cultural adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8:94–104.
  • Mokkink LB, Prinsen CAC, Bouter LM, et al. The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) and how to select an outcome measurement instrument. Braz J Phys Ther. 2016;20:105–113.
  • Field A. Discovering statistics Using SPSS. London (UK): Sage Publication; 2005.
  • Kline P. An easy guide to factor analysis: New York (NY): Routledge; 1994.
  • Ware JE, Sherbourne DC. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection). Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
  • Bilir Kaya B, İçağasıoğlu A. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of short form-36 (SF-36): a study in a group of patients will rheumatic diseases. Turk J Drugs Ther. 2018;2:102–106.
  • Sümer N. Yapısal eşitlik modelleri. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları 2000;3:49–74.
  • Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using multivariate statistics. California: Pearson; 2001.
  • Raju NS, Laffitte LJ, Byrne BM. Measurement equivalence: a comparison of confirmatory factor analysis and item response theory. J Appl Psychol. 2002;87:517–529.
  • Miller T, Chahine S, Childs RA. Detecting differential item functioning and differential step functioning due to differences that should matter. Pract Assess Res Eval. 2010;15:1–13.
  • Elosua P, Wells CS. Detecting DIF in polytomous items using MACS, IRT and ordinal logistic regression. Psicológica. 2013;34:327–342.
  • Mantel N. Chi-square tests with one degree of freedom: Extension of the Mantel-Haenszel procedure. J Am Stat Assoc. 1963;58:690–700.
  • Penfield RD, Algina J. Applying the Liu-Agresti estimator of the cumulative common odds ratio to DIF detection in polytomous items. J Educ Measure. 2003;40:353–370.
  • Camilli G, Congdon P. Application of a method of estimating DIF for polytomous test items. J Educ Behav Stat. 1999;24:323–341.
  • Crocker LM, Algina J. Introduction to classical and modern test theory. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston; 1986.
  • Hooper D, Coughan J, Mullen M. Structural equation modeling: Guidelines for determining model fit. Electron J Business Res Methods. 2008;6:53–60.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.