An exploration of the experiences and utility of functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in people with multiple sclerosis

References

• Dutta R, Trapp BD. Mechanisms of neuronal dysfunction and degeneration in multiple sclerosis. Prog Neurobiol. 2011;93:1–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noseworthy JH, Lucchinetti C, Rodriguez M. Multiple sclerosis. N Engl J Med. 2000;343:938–952.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pike J, Jones E, Rajagopalan K, et al. Social and economic burden of walking and mobility problems in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:94.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• LaRocca NG. Impact of walking impairment in multiple sclerosis. Patient. 2011;4:189–201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Heesen C, Böhm J, Reich C, et al. Patients perception of bodily functions in multiple sclerosis: gait and visual function are the most valuable. Mult Scler. 2008;14:988–991.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crenshaw SJ, Royer TD, Richards JG, et al. Gait variability in people with Multiple Sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2006;12:613–619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin CL, Phillips BA, Kilpatrick TJ, et al. Gait and balance impairment in early multiple sclerosis in the absence of clinical disability. Mult Scler. 2006;12:620–628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morris M, Cantell C, Vowels L, et al. Changes in gait and fatigue from morning to afternoon in people with multiple sclerosis. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2002;72:361–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul L, Raffety D, Young S, et al. The effect of functional electrical stimulation on the physiological cost of gait in people with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2008;14:954–961.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matsuda PN, Shumway-Cook A, Bamer AM, et al. Falls in multiple sclerosis. PM R. 2011;3:624–632.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Peterson EW, Cho CC, Finlayson ML. Fear of falling and associated activity curtailment among middle aged and older adults with multiple sclerosis. Mult Scler. 2007;13:1168–1175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dapul G, Bethoux F. Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in multiple sclerosis. US Neurol. 2015;11:10–18.
   Google Scholar
• Springer S, Khamis S. Effects of functional electrical stimulation on gait in people with multiple sclerosis - a systematic review. Mult Scler Relat Disord. 2017;13:4–12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L, McFadyen A, Lord AC, et al. Functional electrical stimulation for foot drop in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the effect on gait speed. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1435–1452.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheffler LR, Bailey SN, Chae J. Spatiotemporal and kinematic effect of peroneal nerve stimulation versus an ankle-foot orthosis in patients with multiple sclerosis: a case series. PM R. 2009;1:604–611.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Scott S, Linden M, Hooper J, et al. Quantification of gait kinematics and walking ability of people with multiple sclerosis who are new users of functional electrical stimulation. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:364–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van der Linden ML, Scott SM, Hooper JE, et al. Gait kinematics of people with multiple sclerosis and the acute application of functional electrical stimulation. Gait Posture. 2014;39:1092–1096.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Galvin JC. Matching people with technology. Rehab Management. 1994;9:128–130.
   Google Scholar
• Van der Linden ML, Hooper JE, Cowan P, et al. Habitual functional electrical stimulation therapy improves gait kinematics and walking performance, but not patient-reported functional outcomes, of people with multiple sclerosis who present with foot-drop. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Downing A, Van Ryn D, Fecko A, et al. Effect of a 2-week trial of functional electrical stimulation on gait function and quality of life in people with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2014;16:146–152.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Barrett C, Taylor P. The effects of the odstock drop foot stimulator on perceived quality of life for people with stroke and multiple sclerosis. Neuromodulation. 2010;13:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esnouf JE, Taylor PN, Mann GE, et al. Impact on activities of daily living using a functional electrical stimulation device to improve dropped foot in people with multiple sclerosis, measured by the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Mult Scler. 2010;16:1141–1147.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor PN, Burridge JH, Dunkerley AL, et al. Clinical use of the odstock dropped foot stimulator: its effect on the speed and effort of walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:1577–1583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor P, Johnson M, Mann G, et al. Patterns of use and user’s perceptions of the Odstock dropped foot stimulator following stroke and multiple sclerosis. Proceedings of the 9th Annual Conference of the International Functional Electrical Stimulation Society 2004; Bournemouth, UK: 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bulley C, Mercer TH, Hooper JE, et al. Experiences of functional electrical stimulation (FES) and ankle foot orthoses (AFOs) for foot-drop in people with multiple sclerosis. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2015;10:458–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller L, Lord A, McFadyen AK, et al. A comparison of the initial orthotic effects of functional electrical stimulation and ankle-foot orthoses on the speed and oxygen cost of gait in Multiple Sclerosis. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2018;5. DOI:10.1177/2055668318755071
   Google Scholar
• Smith JA, Flowers P, Larkin M. Interpretative phenomenological analysis: theory, method and research. London: SAGE Publications Ltd; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rotter JB. Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Psychol Monograph Gen Appl. 1966;80:1–28.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ryan RM, Deci EL. Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. Am Psychol. 2000;55:68–78.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wajda DA, Sosnoff JJ. Cognitive-motor interference in multiple sclerosis: a systematic review of evidence, correlates, and consequences. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:1–8.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciol MA, Matsuda PN, Khurana SR, et al. Effect of cognitive demand on functional mobility in ambulatory individuals with multiple sclerosis. Int J MS Care. 2017;19:217–224.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Finlayson M. Multiple sclerosis rehabilitation: from impairment to participation. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press Taylor and Frances group; 2012. Chapter 6, p. 111.
   Google Scholar
• Finlayson ML, Peterson EW, Cho CC. Risk factors for falling among people aged 45 to 90 years with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1274–1279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Everaert DG, Thompson AK, Chong SL, et al. Does functional electrical stimulation for foot drop strengthen corticospinal connections? Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2010;24:168–177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Souza A, Kelleher A, Cooper R, et al. Multiple sclerosis and mobility-related assistive technology: systematic review of literature. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:213–224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beckerman H, de Groot V, Scholten MA, et al. Physical activity behaviour of people with multiple sclerosis: understanding how they become more physically active. Phys Ther. 2010;90:1001–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Motl RW. Physical activity and irreversible disability in multiple sclerosis. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2010;38:186–191.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vanner EA, Block P, Christodoulou CC, et al. Pilot study exploring quality of life and barriers to leisure-time physical activity in persons with moderate to severe multiple sclerosis. Disabil Health J. 2008;1:58–65.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korwin-Piotrowska K, Korwin-Piotrowska T, Samochowiec J. Self-perception among patients with multiple sclerosis. Arch Psychiatr Psychother. 2010;3:63–68.
   Google Scholar
• Boeije HR, Duijnstee MSH, Grypdonck MHF, et al. Encountering the downward phase: biographical work in people with multiple sclerosis living at home. Soc Sci Med. 2002;55:881–893.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Irvine H, Davidson C, Hoy K, et al. Psychosocial adjustment to multiple sclerosis: exploration of identity redefinition. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:599–606.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verza R, Lopes Carvalho ML, Battaglia MA, et al. An interdisciplinary approach to evaluating the need for assistive technology reduces equipment abandonment. Mult Scler. 2006;12:88–93.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wessels R, Dijcks B, Soede M, et al. Non-use of provided assistive technology devices, a literature review. Technol Disabil. 2006;1:97–98.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor P, Humphreys L, Swain I. The long-term cost-effectiveness of the use of functional electrical stimulation for the correction of dropped foot due to upper motor neurone lesion. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45:154–160.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Squires LA, Williams N, Morrison VL. Matching and accepting assistive technology in multiple sclerosis: a focus group study with people with multiple sclerosis, carers and occupational therapists. J Health Psychol. 2016. DOI:10.1177/1359105316677293
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Johnston P, Currie LM, Drynan D, et al. Getting it ‘right’: how collaborative relationships between people with disabilities and professionals can lead to the acquisition of needed assistive technology. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:421–431.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marini I, Stebnicki MA. Uses and benefits of assistive technology: the human component. The psychological and social impact of illness and disability. 6th ed. New York (NY): Springer Publishing Company; 2012. Chapter 21. p. 332–333.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer M, Jutai J, Fuhrer M, et al. A framework for modeling the selection of assistive technology devices (ATDs). Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2:1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Engen V, Pickering JB, Walland P. Machine agency in human-machine networks; impacts and trust implications. 18th International Conference on Human-Computer Interaction International; 17 – 2016 Jul 22; Toronto, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Epley N, Waytz A, Cacioppo JT. On seeing human: a three-factor theory of anthropomorphism. Psychol Rev. 2007;114:864–886.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schou L, Høstrup H, Lyngsø EE, et al. Validation of a new assessment tool for qualitative research articles. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68:2086–2094.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyrick J. What is good qualitative research? A first step towards a comprehensive approach to judging rigour/quality. J Health Psychol. 2006;11:799–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar