A limb to stand on? A scoping review of employability assessment in Australian total and permanent disability insurance claims

References

• Bui H, Cummings B. Underinsurance: disability protection gap in Australia [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from: https://fsc.org.au/_entity/annotation/7bf51679-c0c6-e611-80d2-00155dea4d00
   Google Scholar
• Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia. Insurance administration expenses [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from: http://www.superannuation.asn.au/media-release-28-august-2014
   Google Scholar
• Financial Services Council. Insurance within superannuation provides critical economic and social benefits [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 16]. Available from: http://www.fsc.org.au/downloads/file/MediaReleaseFile/2016_1207_MEDIARELEASE_Groupinsuranceprovidescriticaleconomicandsocialbenefits.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Clare R. The experience of individuals with insurance through superannuation [Internet]. Association of Superannuation Funds of Australia; 2017 [cited 2017 Nov 24]. Available from: https://www.superannuation.asn.au/ArticleDocuments/359/1709_Insurance_through_superannuation.pdf.aspx?Embed=Y
   Google Scholar
• Berrill J. TPD claims: a consumer's perspective. ALUCA Claims Management Group seminar; 2014 Feburary; Sydney, Australia.
   Google Scholar
• Black ME. Employability aspects of total and permanent disablement [Internet]. Sydney (NSW): ALUCA RiskeBusiness; 2007 [cited 2015 June 17]. Available from: http://www.metisrehab.com.au/downloads/ALUCA_Employability_Aspects_oftpD_Black_2007.pdf
   Google Scholar
• MacDonald G. The use of medical reports in assessment of TPD [Internet]. Superannuation Complaints Tribunal; 2007 [cited 2016 Sep 9]. Available from: http://webdev.sct.gov.au/dreamcms/app/webroot/uploads/documents/SCTMar07Bulletin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Smith v. Club Plus Superannuation Pty Limited, FCA 1519 (2004).
   Google Scholar
• Chammas v. Harwood Nominees Pty Ltd, ANZ Ins Cas 61-175 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Szuster v. Hest Aust Ltd & Anor, DCCIV-98-1071 SADC 2 (2000).
   Google Scholar
• HCF Life Insurance Co Pty Ltd v Kelly, WASCA 264 (2002).
   Google Scholar
• Mpofu E, Oakland T. Assessment in rehabilitation and health. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Merrill; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Counselling Association of Australasia. RCAA members blitz the field. [Internet]. Autumn Newsletter; 2008 [cited 2016 Jan 29]. Available from: www.rcaa.org.au
   Google Scholar
• Matthews LR, Buys NJ, Crocker R, et al. Overview of disability employment policy and rehabilitation practice in Australia: implications for rehabilitation counselor education. Rehab Educ. 2007;21:241–250.
   Google Scholar
• Buys N, Matthews LR, Randall C. Contemporary vocational rehabilitation in Australia. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:820–824.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casey P, Cameron I. Principles of best practice in occupational rehabilitation for AIA Australia. Sydney (NSW): AIA Australia Rehabilitation Unit; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8:19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5:1–9.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Levac D, O'Brien KK, et al. Scoping reviews: time for clarity in definition, methods, and reporting. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:1291–1294.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shen N, Sockalingam S, Abi Jaoude A, et al. Scoping review protocol: education initiatives for medical psychiatry collaborative care. BMJ Open. 2017;7:1–6. DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2017-015886
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun HL. Current best practices for the conduct of scoping reviews [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2017 May 20]. Available from: http://www.equator-network.org/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/Gerstein-Library-scoping-reviews_May-12.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Moher D, Shamseer L, Clarke M, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement. Syst Rev. 2015;4:1.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberani V, Pietrangeli PDC, Mazza A. The use of grey literature in health sciences: a preliminary survey. Bull Med Libr Assoc. 1990;78:358
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Paez A. Gray literature: an important resource in systematic reviews. J Evid Based Med. 2017;10:233–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Glynn L. A critical appraisal tool for library and information research. Library Hi Tech. 2006;24:387–399.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arndell M, Goodfellow T. Scholarly versus non-scholarly resources [Internet]. 2010 [cited 2015 Nov 12]. Available from: http://www.library.usyd.edu.au/skills/elearning/print/iResearch_Print_SchVsNonSch.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Driver C, Kean B, Oprescu F, et al. Knowledge, behaviors, attitudes and beliefs of physiotherapists towards the use of psychological interventions in physiotherapy practice: a systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2237–2249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearman M, Dawson P. Qualitative synthesis and systematic review in health professions education. Med Educ. 2013;47:252-260.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas J, Harden A. Methods for the thematic synthesis of qualitative research in systematic reviews. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2008;8:45. Database
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barros-Bailey M. History of forensic vocational rehabilitation consulting. In: Robinson R, editor. Foundations of forensic vocational rehabilitation. New York (NY): Springer; 2013. p. 13–31.
   Google Scholar
• Crystal RM, Erickson AS. Forensic assessment. In: Mpofu E, editor. Assessment in rehabilitation and health. Upper Saddle River (NJ): Merrill; 2010. p. 172–191.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson R, Paquette S. Vocational rehabilitation process and work life. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2013;24:521–538.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rehabilitation Counselling Association of Australasia. RCAA: Code of Ethics [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2017 May 10]. Available from: https://www.rcaa.org.au/assets/frontend/pages/Code%20of%20Ethics/RCAA%20Code%20of%20Ethics.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Pryor R, Hawkins TK. Medico-legal employability assessment: myths, mistakes and misconceptions. Aust Career Dev. 2009;18:45–53.
   Google Scholar
• Pryor R. Mind mapping for medico-legal vocational assessment. In: McMahon M, Patton W, editors. Ideas for career practitioners: celebrating excellence in career practice. Samford Valley, Qld: Australian Academic Press, 2015. p. 215–219.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Introduction to vocational rehabilitation. In: Robinson R, editor. Foundations of forensic vocational rehabilitation. New York (NY): Springer; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Barros-Bailey M. Forensic and indirect services. In: Tarvydas VM, Hartley MT, editors. The professional practice of rehabilitation counseling. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer; 2017. p. 297.
   Google Scholar
• Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc, 509 US 579, 58 (1993).
   Google Scholar
• Kumho Tire Co. v. Carmichael, 526 U.S. 137 (1999).
   Google Scholar
• Williams JM, Dunn PL, Bast S, et al. Factors considered by vocational rehabilitation professionals in employability and earning capacity assessment. Rehabil Couns Bull. 2006;50:24–34.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shahnasarian M, Lassiter D. Attorney perceptions of vocational evaluation methodologies. Rehab Pro. 2002;10:38–43.
   Google Scholar
• Robinson R. Identification of core variables to be considered in an assessment of vocational earning capacity in a legal-forensic setting: a Delphi study [dissertation]. Ann Arbor (MI): University of Florida; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Barros-Bailey M, Robinson R. Thirty years of rehabilitation forensics: inclusion of occupational and labor market information competencies in earning capacity models. Rehab Pro. 2012;20:157–166.
   Google Scholar
• Austin T, Barzegarian B, Ciddio M, et al. White paper: IARP-DFEC work group on recommended standards for vocational rehabilitation experts in California. Rehab Pro. 2009;17:147–156.
   Google Scholar
• Fabrizo E. Australian group disability business: will we ever learn [Internet]. GenRe; 2014 [cited 2015 Nov 24]. Available from: http://media.genre.com/documents/topics23-fabrizio-en.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Leas I, Burgess F. Are we there yet? The group risk market two years on [Internet]. 2015 [cited 2016 Jan 25]. Available from: http://www.actuaries.asn.au/Library/Events/SUM/2015/3bIlanLeasFrancisBurgess.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mason R. The winding path. Superfunds Magazine. 2016;32–33.
   Google Scholar
• Davis I. Fitting the TPD pieces [Internet]. Superfunds Magazine. 2000; [cited 2016 Oct 15]. Available from: http://web.archive.org/web/20050616024809/http://www.superannuation.asn.au/superfunds/rpm.cfm?page=archived_issue&issuenumber=238
   Google Scholar
• Mace J. End of the line for TPD? Superfunds Magazine. 1996;34–36.
   Google Scholar
• Riskinfo. New super TPD definition questioned [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://riskinfo.com.au/news/2014/11/11/new-super-tpd-definition-questioned/
   Google Scholar
• Snyder D. Sunsuper overhauls TPD cover [Internet]. Financial Standard; 2016; [cited 2016 Nov 22]. Available from: http://www.financialstandard.com.au/news/view/82328045
   Google Scholar
• Lee N. TPD claims and the availability of alternative works: Lazarevic v. United Super. Australian Ins Law B. 2014;30:46–47.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond S. Assessing disability in the real world: Folan v. United Super. Australian Ins Law B. 2014;30:42–45.
   Google Scholar
• Tsacalos A. Where will you be if you do not consider TPD? Australian Ins Law B. 2005;20:69–72.
   Google Scholar
• Wicks R, Elena B. Unsuccessful job applications and impact on TPD: Birdssall v. MTA and Metlife Insurance [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2015 May 6]. Available from: http://riskinfo.com.au/case-studies/2014/08/12/case-study-unsuccessful-job-applications-and-their-impact-on-tpd/
   Google Scholar
• Wong T, Charaneka S, Drummond S. TPD claims and attempts to find alternative work: Birdsall v. MTAA Super. Australian Ins Law B. 2014;30:82–84.
   Google Scholar
• Drummond S. The meaning of “reasonably fitted by education, training or experience”: Jones v. United Super. Australian Ins Law B. 2017;33:2–5.
   Google Scholar
• Myatt J. Casenote: HCF Life Insurance v. Kelly. Aust Super Law Bull. 2002;14:36–37.
   Google Scholar
• Sullivan M. TPD claims: keeping insurers and trustees on their toes. Superfunds Magazine. 2000;18–19.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor M. Status and seniority ruled out in TPD claims. Super Review. 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Purcell L. Is TPD now the “by”? Australian Super Law Bull. 2017;29.
   Google Scholar
• Riskinfo. Critical court decision removes TPD distinctions [Internet]. 2016 [cited 2016 Dec 12]. Available from: http://riskinfo.com.au/news/2016/07/26/critical-court-decision-removes-tpd-distinctions/?utm
   Google Scholar
• Matkovich N, Drummond S, Mitchell J. TPD benefits and capacity for part-time work: Hannover Life Re v. Dargan. Australian Super Law Bull. 2013;24:168–169.
   Google Scholar
• Norris L. Total and permanent disablement, part-time work and reasonable retraining: Hannover Life Re of Australasia Ltd v. Dargan. Australian Ins Law B. 2013;28:68–70.
   Google Scholar
• Kocis A. Does an ability to do part-time work disentitle a TPD claimant? Part 2. Australian Super Law Bull. 2008;20:40–43.
   Google Scholar
• Battye P. When must a claimant satisfy the policy definition of TPD? Australian Ins Law B. 2007;22:70–74.
   Google Scholar
• Edwards A. Court confirms six months is the time for assessing TPD. Australian Ins Law B. 2008;23:110–112.
   Google Scholar
• Davis N. Deciding the date. Superfunds. 2008;323:20–23.
   Google Scholar
• Bowley R. The progressive evolution of Australian insurers' duty of utmost good faith to third party claimants. ILJ. 2016;27:194–213.
   Google Scholar
• Grant GM, Spittal MJ, O’Donnell ML, et al. Relationship between stressfulness of claiming for injury compensation and long-term recovery: a prospective cohort study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71:446–453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Interactions between injured workers and insurers in workers' compensation systems: a systematic review of qualitative research literature. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25:160–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers’ compensation process on their health: a Québec study. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30:427–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murgatroyd DF, Casey PP, Cameron ID, et al. The effect of financial compensation on health outcomes following musculoskeletal injury: systematic review. PLoS One. 2015;10:e0117597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stebbins RA. Exploratory research in the social sciences. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• van Mossel C, Leitz L, Scott S, et al. Information needs across the colorectal cancer care continuum: scoping the literature. Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 2012;21:296–320.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson J, Loyola-Sanchez A, Sinclair S, et al. Self-management interventions for chronic disease: a systematic scoping review. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:1067–1077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liamputtong P. Qualitative research methods. South Melbourne (Vic): Oxford University Press; 2012.
   Google Scholar