Psychological preconditions for flourishing through ultrabilitation: a descriptive framework

References

• Disability. World report on disability [WHO update]. [Internet]; 2017 [cited 2017 October 27]. Available from: http://www.who.int/disabilities/world_report/2011/en/.
   Google Scholar
• Buetow SA, Martínez-Martín P, McCormack B. Ultrabilitation: beyond recovery-oriented rehabilitation. Disab Rehab. 2017;1. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2017.1406997.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ludwig D, Kabat-Zinn J. Mindfulness in medicine. JAMA. 2008;300:1350–1352.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Robbins P, Aydede M. A short primer on situated cognition. In: P. Robbins, M. Aydede, editors. The Cambridge handbook of situated cognition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009;3–10.
   Google Scholar
• Calhoun L, Tedeschi R, editors. Handbook of posttraumatic growth. New York: Psychology Press; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Ryff CD, Singer BH. Know thyself and become what you are. J Happiness Stud. 2008;9:13-39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E. Happy people live longer: subjective well-being contributes to health and longevity. Appl Psychol: Health Well-Being. 2011;3:1–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peterson C, Seligman M, editors. Character strengths and virtues. A handbook and classification. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Scovell Shinn F. The game of life and how to play it. Saffron Walden: C.W. Daniel; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Husserl E. Analyses concerning active and passive synthesis: lectures on transcendental logic. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bower M. Husserl's theory of instincts as a theory of affection. J Brit Soc Phenomen. 2014;45:133–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lustyk MK, Chawla N, Nolan R, et al. Mindfulness meditation research: issues of participant screening, safety procedures, and researcher training. Adv Mind Body Med. 2009;24:20–30.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Csıkszentmihalyi M. Creativity: flow and the psychology of discovery and invention. New York: Harper Collins; 1996.
   Google Scholar
• Brenes GA, Guralnik JM, Williamson JD, et al. The influence of anxiety on the progression of disability. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:34–39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers S. Feel the fear and do it anyway. London: Arrow Books; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Cornwell BR, Mueller SC, Kaplan R, et al. Anxiety, a benefit and detriment to cognition: behavioral and magnetoencephalographic evidence from a mixed-saccade task. Brain Cogn. 2012;78:257–267.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aronson E, Willerman B, Floyd J. The effect of a pratfall on increasing interpersonal attractiveness. Psychon Sci. 1966;4:227–228.
   Google Scholar
• Lebacqz J. Apprehension or assent?. Heythrop J. 1964;5:36–57.
   Google Scholar
• Maslow A. A theory of human motivation. Psychol Rev. 1943;50:370–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurley P. The many appetites of Thomas Hobbes. Hist Philos Q. 1990;10:391–407.
   Google Scholar
• Ferry L. The wisdom of the myths. New York: Harper Perennial; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Dace P. Nietzsche contra superman: an examination of the work of Frank Miller. S Afr J Philos. 2007;26:69–77.
   Google Scholar
• Powers C, Hart VA, Shattell M, et al. The concept of "the will to thrive" in mental health. Issues Ment Health Nurs. 2012;33:805–807.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Nietzsche F. Thus spoke Zarathustra. London: Penguin; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Schopenhauer A. The world as will and idea. Kegan Paul: London; 1896.
   Google Scholar
• Koch R. The 80/20 principle: the secret of achieving more with less. London: Nicholas Brealey Publishing; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Frankl V. Man's search for meaning: an introduction to logotherapy. Boston: Beacon Press; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Petty R, Wegener D, Fabrigar L. Attitudes and attitude change. Annu Rev Psychol. 1997; 48:609–647.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caprara G, Eisenberg N, Alessandri G. Positivity: the dispositional basis of happiness. J Happiness Stud. 2017;18:353–371.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jenner H. The pygmalion effect: the importance of expectancies. Alcohol Treat Q. 1990;7:127–133.
   Google Scholar
• de Botton A. How Proust can change your life. London: Picador; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Berrios R, Totterdell P, Kellett S. When feeling mixed can be meaningful: the relation between mixed emotions and eudaimonic well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:841–861.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Howell A. Self-affirmation theory and the science of well-being. J Happiness Stud. 2017; 18:293–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stoltz P. Adversity quotient: turning obstacles into opportunities. New York: Wiley; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• do Vale RC, Pieters R, Zeelenberg M. The benefits of behaving badly on occasion: successful regulation by planned hedonic deviations. J Consumer Psychol. 2016;26:17–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bioethius The consolation of philosophy. Book 4. Harmondsworth, UK: Penguin; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis CS. The problem of pain. London: Collins; 1940.
   Google Scholar
• Sontag S. Regarding the pain of others. London: Penguin; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Carel H. Virtue in deficit: the 9-year old hero. Lancet 2017;389:1094–1095.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Csikszentmihalyi M. The evolving self. New York: Harper Perennial; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Andrews SE. From awful to awe-full: easing the discomfort of uncertain waiting periods. [Dissertation Abstracts Internat: Section B: The Sciences and Engineering; 78(5-B(E))]. SEFE; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Keltner D, Haidt J. Approaching awe, a moral, spiritual, and aesthetic emotion. Cogn Emot. 2003;17:297–314.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaihinger H. The philosophy of 'as if'. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul; 1924.
   Google Scholar
• Wayland S, Maple M, McKay K, et al. Holding on to hope: a review of the literature exploring missing persons, hope and ambiguous loss. Death Stud. 2016;40:54–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schalk S. Coming to claim crip: disidentification with/in disability studies. Disab Stud Q. [Internet]. 2013;33:Available at: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/3705.
   Google Scholar
• Parens E. Choosing flourishing: toward a more "binocular" way of thinking about disability. Kennedy Instit Ethics J. 2017;27:135–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp CA, Goscha R. The strengths model: a recovery-oriented approach to mental health services. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Dunn D, Uswatte G, Elliott T. Happiness, resilience, and positive growth following physical disability: Issues for understanding, research and therapeutic intervention. In: S. Lopez, C. R. Snyder, editors. Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Kafer A. Feminist, crip, queer. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Buetow S. The virtue of uncertainty in health care J Eval Clin Pract. 2011; 17:873–876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber J, Mauss I, Tamir M. A dark side of happiness? How, when, and why happiness is not always good. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2011;6:222–233.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fredrickson BL, Losada MF. Positive affect and the complex dynamics of human flourishing. Am Psychol. 2005;60:678–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Söder M. Prejudice or ambivalence? Attitudes towards persons with disabilities. Disab. Handicap Soc. 1990;5:227–241.
   Google Scholar
• Muller JF. Disability, ambivalence, and the law. Am J Law Med. 2011;37:469–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chandra S, Leong FT. A diversified portfolio model of adaptability. Am Psychol. 2016; 71:847–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Serbic D, Pincus T. The relationship between pain, disability, guilt and acceptance in low back pain: a mediation analysis. J Behav Med. 2017;40:651–658.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brudney D, Lantos J. Agency and authenticity: which value grounds patient choice?. Theor Med Bioeth. 2011;32:217–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright B, Lopez S. Widening the diagnostic focus: a case for including human strengths and environmental resources. In: S. Lopez, C. Snyder, editors. The Oxford handbook of positive psychology. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2011;71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Bradford G, Keller S. Chapter: Well-being and achievement. In: G. Fletcher, editor. The Routledge Handbook of Philosophy of Well-Being. London: Routledge; 2016:271–280.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: V. S. Ramachaudran, editor. Encyclopedia of human behaviour. New York: Academic Press; 1994;71–81.
   Google Scholar
• Estés CP. Women who run with wolves. London: Rider; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sex and disability: time to treat all women as individuals. BMJ 2017;358:j3454.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reich W. The function of the orgasm: sex-economic problems of biological energy: the discovery of the orgone. Volume I. Oxford: Touchstone; 1973.
   Google Scholar
• Murdoch I. The sovereignty of good over other concepts. New York: Cambridge University Press; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Diebels KJ, Leary MR. The psychological implications of believing that everything is one. J Posit Psychol. 2018;14:1–11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans J. The art of losing control. Edinburgh: Canongate; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Gawain S. Creative visualization. New York: Bantam Books; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Campbell J, Moyers B. The power of myth. New York: Anchor Books; 1991.
   Google Scholar
• Critcher CR, Dunning D. Self-affirmations provide a broader perspective on self-threat. Pers Soc Psychol Bull. 2015;41:3–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• James W. Letter to Helen Keller, 1908. In: K. Skrupskelis, E. Berkeley, editors. The correspondence of William James. Charlottesville: University of Virginia Press; 1999;12:125.
   Google Scholar
• Goffman E. The presentation of self in everyday life. London: Allen Lane; 1969.
   Google Scholar
• Asch S. Effects of group pressure upon the modification and distortion of judgments. In: H. Guetzkow, editor. Groups, leadership and men; research in human relations. Oxford: Carnegie Press; 1951;177–90.
   Google Scholar
• Harpur P. Embracing the new disability rights paradigm: the importance of the convention on the rights of persons with disabilities. Disab Soc. 2012;27:1–14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parsons T. The social system. Glencoe IL: Free Press; 1951.
   Google Scholar
• Cecchetti L, Kupers R, Ptito M, et al. Are supramodality and cross-modal plasticity the yin and yang of brain development? From blindness to rehabilitation. Front Syst Neurosci. 2016;10:89
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapur N, Cole J, Manly T, et al. Positive clinical neuroscience: explorations in positive neurology. Neuroscientist. 2013;19:354–369.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Buetow S. Person-centred health care. Balancing the welfare of clinicians and patients. Oxford: Routledge; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Bastian B, Jetten J, Hornsey MJ, et al. The positive consequences of pain: a biopsychosocial approach. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2014;18:256–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rotenberg M. The psychology of tzimtzum. Jerusalem: Maggid Books; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hillman J. The soul's code: In search of character and calling. New York: Warner Books; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Wenjie S, Ho S M. Does being mindful of your character strengths enhance psychological well-being? A longitudinal mediation analysis. J Happiness Stud. 2018;19:1045–1066.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura A. Social cognitive theory. In: R. Vasta, editor. Annals of Child Development. Greenwich, CT: Jai Press Ltd; 1989;1–60.
   Google Scholar