A grounded theory of parents’ attendance, participation and engagement in children’s developmental rehabilitation services: Part 2. The journey to child health and happiness

References

• Kuhlthau KA, Bloom S, Van Cleave J, et al. Evidence for family-centered care for children with special health care needs: a systematic review. Acad Pediatr. 2011;11:136–143.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, King S, Law M, et al. Family-centred service: a conceptual framework and research review. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 1998;86:1–20.
   Google Scholar
• Siebes RC, Wijnroks L, Ketelaar M, et al. Parent participation in paediatric rehabilitation treatment centres in the Netherlands: a parents' viewpoint. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33:196–205.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arai L, Stapley S, Roberts H. 'Did not attends' in children 0-10: a scoping review. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40:797–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Littell J, Alexander L, Reynolds W. Client participation: central and underinvestigated elements of intervention. Soc Serv Rev. 2001;75:1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes NM, Worrall L, et al. A conceptual review of engagement in healthcare and rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:643–654.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• D'Arrigo R, Ziviani J, Poulsen AA, et al. Child and parent engagement in therapy: what is the key? Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64(4):340–343.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Petersen P. Child and parent engagement in the mental health intervention process: a motivational framework. Child and Child Adolesc Ment Health. 2014;19:2–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boag-Munroe G, Evangelou M. From hard to reach to how to reach: a systematic review of the literature on hard-to-reach families. Res Pap Ed. 2012;27:209–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phoenix M, Rosenbaum P. Development and implementation of a paediatric rehabilitation care path for hard-to-reach families: a case report. Child Care Health Dev. 2015;41:494–499.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkworth G, McArthur M, Layton M, et al. Opportunities lost––why some parents of young children are not well-connected to the service systems designed to assist them. Aust Soc Work. 2010;63:431–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Servais M, Shepherd TA, et al. A listening skill educational intervention for pediatric rehabilitation clinicians: a mixed-methods pilot study. Dev Neurorehabil. 2017;20(1):40-52.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurtubise K, Carpenter C. Parents' experiences in role negotiation within an infant services program. Infants Young Child. 2011;24:75–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Øien I, Fallang B, Østensjø S. Goal-setting in paediatric rehabilitation: perceptions of parents and professional. Child Care Health Dev. 2010;36:558–565.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiart L, Ray L, Darrah J, et al. Parents' perspectives on occupational therapy and physical therapy goals for children with cerebral palsy. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32:248–258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G, Currie M, Bartlett DJ, et al. The development of expertise in pediatric rehabilitation therapists: changes in approach, self-knowledge, and use of enabling and customizing strategies. Dev Neurorehabil. 2007;10:223–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Forsingdal S, St John W, Miller V, et al. Goal setting with mothers in child development services. Child Care Health Dev. 2014;40:587–596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Staudt M. Treatment engagement with caregivers of at-risk children: gaps in research and conceptualization. J Child Fam Stud. 2007;16:183–196.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory: a practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Constructing grounded theory. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Higginbottom G, Lauridsen EI. The roots and development of constructivist grounded theory. Nurse Res. 2014;21:8–13.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. But is it rigorous? Trustworthiness and authenticity in naturalistic evaluation. New Dir Eval. 1986;30:73–84.
   Google Scholar
• Gentles SJ, Jack SM, Nicholas DB, et al. Critical approach to reflexivity in grounded theory. Qual Rep. 2014;19:1–14.
   Google Scholar
• Breckenridge J, Jones D. Demystifying theoretical sampling in grounded theory. Grounded Theory Rev. 2009;8. http://groundedtheoryreview.com/2009/06/30/847/
   Google Scholar
• Gentles SJ, Charles C, Ploeg J, et al. Sampling in qualitative research: insights from an overview of the methods literature sampling. Qual Rep. 2015;20:1772–1789.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boeije H. A purposeful approach to the constant comparative method in the analysis of qualitative interviews. Qual Quant. 2002;36:391–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bradley EH, Curry LA, Devers KJ. Qualitative data analysis for health services research: developing taxonomy, themes, and theory. Health Serv Res. 2007;42:1758–1772.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser BG, Strauss A. The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago, IL: Aldine; 1967.
   Google Scholar
• Birks M, Chapman Y, Francis K. Memoing in qualitative research: probing data and processes. J Res Nurs. 2008;13:68–75.
   Google Scholar
• Timmermans S, Tavory I. Theory construction in qualitative research: from grounded theory to abductive analysis. Soc Theory. 2012;30:167–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Farmer T, Robinson K, Elliott SJ, et al. Developing and implementing a triangulation protocol for qualitative health research. Qual Health Res. 2006;16:377–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G. A relational goal-oriented model of optimal service delivery to children and families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2009;29:384–408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King G. The role of the therapist in therapeutic change: how knowledge from mental health can inform pediatric rehabilitation. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2017;37(2):121-138.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brewer K, Pollock N, Wright FV. Addressing the challenges of collaborative goal setting with children and their families. Phys Occup Ther Pediatr. 2014;34:138–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hessell S. ‘Entering the unknown? ’ Identifying potential expectations of paediatric occupational therapy held by families. New Zealand J Occup Ther. 2004;51:5–11.
   Google Scholar
• Coyne I. Families and health-care professionals' perspectives and expectations of family-centred care: Hidden expectations and unclear roles. Health Expect. 2015;18:796–808.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews F, Griffiths N, Harrison L, et al. Expectations of parents on low incomes and therapists who work with parents on low incomes of the first therapy session. Aust Occup Ther J. 2013;60:436–444.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll C. "It's not everyday that parents get a chance to talk like this": exploring parents' perceptions and expectations of speech-language pathology services for children with intellectual disability. Int J Speech Lang Pathol. 2010;12:352–361.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lyons R, O'Malley MP, O'Connor P, et al. 'It's just so lovely to hear him talking': exploring the early-intervention expectations and experiences of parents. Child Lang Teach Ther. 2010;26:61–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Teachman G, Wright V, et al. Children's and parents' beliefs regarding the value of walking: rehabilitation implications for children with cerebral palsy. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:61–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE, Darrah J, Cameron D, et al. Revisiting therapy assumptions in children's rehabilitation: clinical and research implications. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1446–1453.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gibson BE. Rehabilitation: a post-critical approach. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health ICF. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cunningham BJ, Washington KN, Binns A, et al. Current methods of evaluating speech-language outcomes for preschoolers with communication disorders: a scoping review using the icf-cy. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2017;60:447–464.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darrah J. Using the ICF as a framework for clinical decision making in pediatric physical therapy. Adv Physiother. 2008;10:146–151.
   Google Scholar
• Ketelaar M, Bogossian A, Saini M, et al. Assessment of the family environment in pediatric neurodisability: a state-of-the-art review. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59(3):259-269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geyh S, Peter C, Müller R, et al. The personal factors of the international classification of functioning, disability and health in the literature - a systematic review and content analysis. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33:1089–1102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum P, Gorter JW. The 'f-words' in childhood disability: i swear this is how we should think!. Child Care Health Dev. 2012;38:457–463.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imms C, Granlund M, Rosenbaum P, et al. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;59:16–25.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar