Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 42, 2020 - Issue 19
Submit an article Journal homepage
1,714
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Item reduction of the patient-rated wrist evaluation using decision tree modelling

Mark J.W. van der OestDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; ;Department of Rehabilitation, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherland; ;Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinic, Eindhoven, the Netherlands; Correspondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttp://orcid.org/0000-0002-7046-536X
ORCID Icon,
Jarry T. PorsiusDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; ;Department of Rehabilitation, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherland; ;Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinic, Eindhoven, the Netherlands;
,
Joy C. MacDermidSchool of Rehabilitation Science and School of Physical Therapy, Western University, Ontario, Canada
,
Harm P. SlijperDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; ;Hand and Wrist Center, Xpert Clinic, Eindhoven, the Netherlands;
&
Ruud W. SellesDepartment of Plastic, Reconstructive and Hand Surgery, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherlands; ;Department of Rehabilitation, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, the Netherland;
Pages 2758-2765 | Received 26 Jul 2018, Accepted 04 Jan 2019, Published online: 10 Feb 2019

References

  • Rhee JS, McMullin BT. Outcome measures in facial plastic surgery: patient-reported and clinical efficacy measures. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2008;10:194–207.
  • Zhong T, Pusic AL. Future of outcomes research in plastic surgery. Clin Plast Surg. 2013;40:351–357.
  • Pusic AL, Lemaine V, Klassen AF, et al. Patient-reported outcome measures in plastic surgery: use and interpretation in evidence-based medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;127:1361–1367.
  • Forbes M, Fairlamb H, Jonker L. The health of patients' eyes (HOPE) glaucoma study. The effectiveness of a 'glaucoma personal record' for newly diagnosed glaucoma patients: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:337.
  • Hendrikx J, Fransen J, van Riel PL. Monitoring rheumatoid arthritis using an algorithm based on patient-reported outcome measures: a first step towards personalised healthcare. RMD Open. 2015;1:e000114.
  • Fayanju OM, Mayo TL, Spinks TE, et al. Value-based breast cancer care: a multidisciplinary approach for defining patient-centered outcomes. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016;23:2385–2390.
  • MacDermid JC, Turgeon T, Richards RS, et al. Patient rating of wrist pain and disability: a reliable and valid measurement tool. J Orthop Trauma. 1998;12:577–586.
  • MacDermid JC. Development of a scale for patient rating of wrist pain and disability. J Hand Ther. 1996;9:178–183.
  • Brink SM, Voskamp EG, Houpt P, et al. Psychometric properties of the Patient Rated Wrist/Hand Evaluation - Dutch Language Version (PRWH/E-DLV). J Hand Surg Eur. 2009;34:556–557.
  • Lalone E, MacDermid J, Grewal R, et al. Patient reported pain and disability following a distal radius fracture: a prospective study. Open Orthopaed J. 2017;11:589–599.
  • Constand MK, MacDermid JC, Law M, et al. Patient-centered care and distal radius fracture outcomes: a prospective cohort study analysis. J Hand Ther. 2014;27:177–183.
  • Edwards P, Roberts I, Sandercock P, et al. Follow-up by mail in clinical trials: does questionnaire length matter? Control Clin Trials. 2004;25:31–52.
  • Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, et al. Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009;3:MR000008.
  • Bolt EE, van der Heide A, Onwuteaka-Philipsen BD. Reducing questionnaire length did not improve physician response rate: a randomized trial. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67:477–481.
  • Hung M, Saltzman CL, Greene T, et al. The responsiveness of the PROMIS instruments and the qDASH in an upper extremity population. J Patient Rep Outcomes. 2017;1:12.
  • Crins MHP, Terwee CB, Klausch T, et al. The Dutch-Flemish PROMIS Physical Function item bank exhibited strong psychometric properties in patients with chronic pain. J Clin Epidemiol. 2017;87:47–58.
  • Beaton DE, Wright JG, Katz JN, et al. Development of the QuickDASH: comparison of three item-reduction approaches. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005;87:1038–1046.
  • Waljee JF, Kim HM, Burns PB, et al. Development of a brief, 12-item version of the Michigan Hand Questionnaire. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011;128:208–220.
  • Cella D, Yount S, Rothrock N, et al. The patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS): progress of an NIH roadmap cooperative group during its first two years. Med Care. 2007;45:S3–S11.
  • GV K. An exploratory technique for investigating large quantities of categorical data. Appl Stat. 1980;29:119–127.
  • Delgado-Gomez D, Baca-Garcia E, Aguado D, et al. Computerized adaptive test vs. decision trees: development of a support decision system to identify suicidal behavior. J Affect Disord. 2016;206:204–209.
  • Schmitt JS, Di Fabio RP. Reliable change and minimum important difference (MID) proportions facilitated group responsiveness comparisons using individual threshold criteria. J Clin Epidemiol. 2004;57:1008–1018.
  • TFSP T. CHAID: CHi-squared Automated Interaction Detection 2015.
  • Van der Oest M. DT PRWE. 2017. Available from: http://www.handquestionnaires.net
  • Beckmann JT, Hung M, Voss MW, et al. Evaluation of the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system upper extremity computer adaptive test. J Hand Surg Am. 2016;41:739–744 e4.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.