3,070
Views
5
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Documentation of everyday life and health care following gastrostomy tube placement in children: a content analysis of medical records.

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon &
Pages 2747-2757 | Received 10 Sep 2018, Accepted 19 Jan 2019, Published online: 14 Feb 2019

References

  • Fiese BH, Foley KP, Spagnola M. Routine and ritual elements in family mealtimes: contexts for child well-being and family identity. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2006;111:67–89.
  • Heuschkel RB, Gottrand F, Devarajan K, et al. ESPGHAN position paper on management of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children and adolescents. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2015;60(1):131–141.
  • Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Statistical database of surgical procedures Stockholm: Socialstyrelsen, Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare 2017. [http://www.socialstyrelsen.se/statistik/statistikdatabas/operationerislutenvard]. Accessed 2 February, 2017.
  • Nelson KE, Lacombe-Duncan A, Cohen E, et al. Family experiences with feeding tubes in neurologic impairment: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;136(1):E140–E151.
  • Backman E, Karlsson A-K, Sjogreen L. Gastrostomy tube feeding in children with developmental or acquired disorders: a longitudinal comparison on health care provision, and eating outcomes four years after gastrostomy. Nutr Clin Pract. 2018;33(4):576–583.
  • Lalanne A, Gottrand F, Salleron J, et al. Long-term outcome of children receiving percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2014;59(2):172–176.
  • Bronfenbrenner U, Morris PA. The bioecological model of human development. In: Damon W, Lerner RM, editors. Handbook of child psychology: theoretical models of human development. 6th ed. Hoboken: Wiley; 2006.
  • Weisner TS. Ecocultural understanding of children's developmental pathways. Hum Dev. 2002;45(4):275–281.
  • Sameroff A. The transactional model of development - How children and contexts shape each other. 1st ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association; 2009.
  • Ferm U, Ahlsen E, Björck-Åkesson E. Patterns of communicative interaction between a child with severe speech and physical impairments and her caregiver during a mealtime activity. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;37(1):11–26.
  • Imms C, Granlund M, Wilson PH. Participation, both a means and an end: a conceptual analysis of processes and outcomes in childhood disability. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2016;59(1):16–25.
  • Åvitsland TL, Birketvedt K, Bjornland K. Parent-reported effects of gastrostomy tube placement. Nutr Clin Pract. 2013;28(4):493–498.
  • Edwards S, Davis AM, Bruce A, et al. Caring for tube-fed children: a review of management, tube weaning, and emotional considerations. J Parenter Enteral Nutr. 2016;40(5):616–622.
  • Russell M, Jewell V, Poskey GA, et al. Enteral feeding and its impact on family mealtime routines for caregivers of children with cerebral palsy: a mixed method study. Austral Occup Ther J. 2017;65(1):25–34.
  • Wilken M. The impact of child tube feeding on maternal emotional state and identity: a qualitative meta-analysis. J Pediatr Nurs. 2012;27(3):248–255.
  • Weisner TS, Matheson C, Coots J. Sustainability of daily routines as a family outcome. In: Maynard A, Martini M, editors. Learning in cultural context: family, peers, and school. Boston, MA: Springer US; 2005.
  • Gallimore R, Weisner TS, Bernheimer LP. Family responses to young children with developmental delays: accommodation activity in ecological and cultural context. Am J Mental Retard. 1993;98(2):185–206.
  • Graham F, Rodger S, Ziviani J. Coaching parents to enable children’s participation: an approach for working with parents and their children. Austral Occup Ther J. 2009;56(1):16–23.
  • Brotherton A, Abbott J, Aggett PJ. The impact of percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy feeding in children; the parental perspective. Child Care Health Dev. 2007;33(5):539–546.
  • Agostoni FC, Axelsson WLI, Colomb WLV, et al. The need for nutrition support teams in pediatric units: a commentary by the ESPGHAN Committee on NUTRITION. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2005;41(1):8–11.
  • Sharp WG, Volkert VM, Scahill L. A systematic review and meta-analysis of intensive multidisciplinary intervention for pediatric feeding disorders: how standard is the standard of care? J Pediatr. 2017;181:116–124.e4.
  • Craig GM. Psychosocial aspects of feeding children with neurodisability. Eur J Clin Nutr. 2013;67(S2):S17–S20.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • World Health Organization. International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health: children & youth version: ICF-CY. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2007.
  • Threats T. Use of the ICF in dysphagia management. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28;(4):323–333.
  • Lefton-Greif MA, Arvedson JC. Pediatric feeding and swallowing disorders: state of health, population trends, and application of the international classification of functioning, disability, and health. Semin Speech Lang. 2007;28;(3):161–165.
  • Mahant S, Cohen E, Nelson KE. Decision-making around gastrostomy feeding in children with neurologic impairment: engaging effectively with families. Paediatr Child Health. 2018;23(3):209–213.
  • Adolfsson M, Björck-Åkesson E, Lim C-I. Code sets for everyday life situations of children aged 0–6: sleeping, mealtimes and play — a study based on the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health for Children and Youth. Br J Occup Ther. 2013;76(3):127–136.
  • Ruland CM. Vårdinformatik: hur användning av informations- och kommunikationsteknologi kan utveckla vård och omvårdnad [Health care informatic. How to use the information and communication technology to develop care and nursing]. Larson P, editor. Stockholm: Bokförlaget Natur och kultur [In Swedish]; 2002.
  • Berg M. Practices of reading and writing: the constitutive role of the patient record in medical work. Sociol Health Illness. 1996;18(4):499–524.
  • Prior L. Documents in health research. In: Bourgeault I, Dingwall R, de Vries R, editors. The SAGE handbook of qualitative methods in health research. Los Angeles: SAGE; 2010.
  • Bowen G, A. Document analysis as a quallitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40.
  • Fetters MD, Curry LA, Creswell JW. Achieving integration in mixed methods designs-principles and practices. Health Serv Res. 2013;48(6).
  • Downe‐Wamboldt B. Content analysis: method, applications, and issues. Health Care Women Int. 1992;13(3):313–321.
  • Ylvén R, Granlund M. Collaborative problem solving in the context of early childhood intervention – the link between problems and goals. Scand J Disabil Res. 2015;17(3):221–239.
  • The Swedish Association of Habilitation Services Directors. Policy för specialistområdet habilitering i Sverige [Policy for the Specialised Field of Habilitation in Sweden]. Stockholm; 2014. [http://habiliteringisverige.se/] Accessed May 21, 2018.
  • Carruth BR, Ziegler PJ, Gordon A. Developmental milestones and self-feeding behaviors in infants and toddlers. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004;104, Supplement 1(0):51–56.
  • Nordic Medico-Statistical Committee (NOMESCO). NOMESCO Classification of Surgical Procedures, version 1.15. Copenhagen 2010.
  • World Health Organization. International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision (ICD-10). Malta: World Health Organization; 2011.
  • IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows,. Version 23.0. ed. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.; 2015.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
  • Elo S, Kääriäinen M, Kanste O. Qualitative content analysis: a focus on trustworthiness. SAGE Open. 2014;4(1):1–10.
  • QSR International. NVivo, version 11. Victoria, Australia: Pty Ltd.; 2015.
  • Cieza A, Fayed N, Bickenbach J. Refinements of the ICF Linking Rules to strengthen their potential for establishing comparability of health information. Disabil Rehabil. 2016; 17:1–10.
  • Cieza A, Geyh S, Chatterji S. ICF linking rules: an update based on lessons learned. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(4):212–218.
  • Klang Ibragimova N, Pless M, Adolfsson M. Using content analysis to link texts of assessment and intervention to International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health – version for children and youth (ICF-CY). J Rehabil Med. 2011;43(8):728–733.
  • O'Cathain A, Murphy E, Nicholl J. Three techniques for integrating data in mixed methods studies. BMJ (Clinical research). 2010;341:c4587.
  • World Medical Association. Declaration of Helsinki - Ethical Principles for Medical Research Involving Human Subjects 2013. http://www.wma.net/en/30publications/10policies/b3/.] Accessed 13 May, 2016.
  • Willis C, Girdler S, Thompson M. Elements contributing to meaningful participation for children and youth with disabilities: a scoping review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(17):1771–1784.
  • United Nations. Convention on the Rights of the Child. 1990 [Available from: http://www.ohchr.org/EN/ProfessionalInterest/Pages/CRC.aspx.] Accessed 20 October, 2017.
  • Åvitsland TL, Kristensen C, Emblem R. Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy in children: a safe technique with major symptom relief and high parental satisfaction. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2006;43(5):624–628.