Validity, responsiveness, and perceptions of clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure when used in a sub-acute setting

References

• U.S. Census Bureau . An aging nation: the older population in the United States. Population Estimates and Projections; 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: https://www.census.gov/prod/2014pubs/p25-1140.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Mather M, Jacobsen LA, Pollard KM. Aging in the United States. Population Bulletin, 2015;70(2):1–19 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: https://assets.prb.org/pdf16/aging-us-population-bulletin.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Development of nationally consistent subacute and non-acute admitted patient care data definitions and guidelines. Cat. no. HSE 135. Canberra, ACT: AIHW; 2013 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129543218
   Google Scholar
• Department of Human Services. Sub-acute services strategic directions Victoria; 2012 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: http://health.vic.gov.au/subacute/substrat.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Australia's hospitals 2014-15 at a glance (Health Services Series no. 70); 2016 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: http://www.aihw.gov.au/WorkArea/DownloadAsset.aspx?id=60129556125
   Google Scholar
• Duncan E. Skills for practice in occupational therapy. Edinburgh, UK: Churchill Livingston Elsevier; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Lawrence M, Kinn S. Defining and measuring patient-centred care: an example from a mixed-methods systematic review of the stroke literature. Health Expect. 2012;15(3):295–326.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schell B, Gillen G, Scaffa ME, et al. Willard’s & Spackman's occupational therapy. Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Wade DT. Goal setting in rehabilitation: An overview of what, why and how. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(4):291–295.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leach E, Cornwell P, Fleming J, et al. Patient centered goal-setting in a subacute rehabilitation setting. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(2):159–172.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Wees PJ, Nijhuis-Van Der Sanden MW, Ayanian JZ, et al. Integrating the use of patient-reported outcomes for both clinical practice and performance measurement: views of experts from 3 countries. Milbank Q. 2014;92(4):754–775.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Granger CV, Hamilton BB, Linacre JM, et al. Performance profiles of the Functional Independence Measure. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;72(2):84–89.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chia E-M, Chia E-M, Rochtchina E, et al. Utility and validity of the self-administered SF-36: findings from an older population. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2006;35(7):461–467.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stephens C, Alpass F, Baars M, et al. SF-36v2 norms for New Zealanders aged 55–69 years. N Z Med J. 2010;123(1327):1–11.
   Google Scholar
• Walters SJ, Munro JF, Brazier JE. Using the SF-36 with older adults: a cross-sectional community-based survey. Age Ageing. 2001;30(4): 337–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Law, M, Baptiste S, Carswell A, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. (4th ed.). Ottawa, ON: CAOT Publications; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Letts L, Law M, et al. Feasibility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for routine use. Brit J Occup Ther. 2010;73(2):48–54.
   Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Groot S, Janssen TVJ, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure performance scale: Validity and responsiveness in chronic pain. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2014;51(5):727–746.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Oestergaard LG, Maribo T, Bünger CE, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure’s semi-structured interview: its applicability to lumbar spinal fusion patients. A prospective randomized clinical study. Eur Spine J. 2012;21(1):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sumison T, Law M. A review of evidence on the conceptual elements informing client-centred practice. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73:153–162.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carswell A, McColl MA, Baptiste S, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a research and clinical literature review. Can J Occup Ther. 2004;71(4):210–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Donnelly C, O’Neill C, Bauer M, et al. Canadian Occupational Performance Measure (COPM) in primary care: a profile of practice. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71(6):7106265010p1–7106265010p8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCall MA, Law M, Baptiste S, et al. Targeted applications of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 2005;72(5), 298–300.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Toomey M, Nicholson D, Carswell A. The clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Can J Occup Ther. 1995;62(5):242–249.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuntland H, Aaslund MK, Langeland E, et al. (2016). Psychometric properties of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in home-dwelling older adults. J Multidiscip Healthcare. 2016;9:411–423.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Enemark Larsen A, Carlsson G. Utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure as an admission and outcome measure in interdisciplinary community-based geriatric rehabilitation. Scand J Occup Ther. 2012;19(2):204–213.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker DM. An exploration of client-centred practice in occupational therapy: perspectives and impact [dissertation]. Birmingham, UK: University of Birmingham; 2012. Available from: http://etheses.bham.ac.uk/4432/1/Parker13PhD.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Gustafsson L, Mitchell G, Fleming J, et al. Clinical utility of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in spinal cord injury rehabilitation. Brit J Occup Ther. 2012;75(7):337–342.
   Google Scholar
• Tashakkori A, Teddlie C. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lavrakas, PJ. Encyclopedia of survey research methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J, Clark V. Designing and conducing mixed methods research. London, UK: Sage Publications; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Ware JE, Snow KK, Kosinski et al. SF-36 Health Survey manual and interpretation guide. Boston, MA: New England Medical Center, The Health Institute; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Creswell J. Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches. (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre. The Australasian Rehabilitation Outcomes Centre annual report: The state of rehabilitation in Australia; 2014 [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: http://ahsri.uow.edu.au/content/groups/public/@web/@chsd/@aroc/documents/doc/uow190994.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Case-Smith J. Outcomes in hand rehabilitation using occupational therapy services. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;7:499–506.
   Google Scholar
• van der Linden ML, Kumaran BR, Wade FA, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure before and after total knee arthroplasty, which activities do patients rate as important. Orthop Proceedings. 2018;94-B(Supp_XXIX):24. [cited 2018 Jul 16]. Available from: https://online.boneandjoint.org.uk/doi/abs/10.1302/1358-992X.94BSUPP_XXIX.BASK2011-024
   Google Scholar
• Chan CCH, Lee TMC. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. Occup Ther Int. 1997;4(3):231–249.
   Google Scholar
• Donnelly C, Eng JJ, Hall J, et al. Client-centred assessment and the identification of meaningful treatment goals for individuals with a spinal cord injury. Spinal Cord. 2004;2(5), 302–307.
   Google Scholar
• Ocepek J, Roberts AEK, Vidmar G. Evaluation of treatment in the Smart Home IRIS in terms of functional independence and occupational performance and satisfaction. Comput Math Methods Med. 2013;2013:926858. DOI:10.1155/2013/926858
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Omiya Y, Suzumura S, Itoh N, et al. Effect of adaptations to the living environment on ADL abilities and self-perception of performance/satisfaction―Based on experience from post-discharge home visits. Japanese Comprehen Rehabil Sci. 2016;7:95–101.
   Google Scholar
• Lexell EM, Flansbjer UB, Lexell J. Self-perceived performance and satisfaction with performance of daily activities in persons with multiple sclerosis following interdisciplinary rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):373–378.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan AW, Chung L, Hsin-Hwei G. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for clients with psychiatric disorders in Taiwan. Occup Ther Int. 2003;10(4):269–277.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Spadaro A, Lubrano E, Massimiani MP, et al. Validity, responsiveness and feasibility of an Italian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2010;28(2):215–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verkerk GJ, Wolf MJ, Louwers AM, et al. The reproducibility and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in parents of children with disabilities. Clin Rehabil. 2006;20(11):980–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dedding C, Cardol M, Eyssen IC, et al. Validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure: a client-centred outcome measurement. Clin Rehabil. 2004;18(6):660–667.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Seben R, Reichardt L, Smorenburg S, et al. Goal-setting instruments in geriatric rehabilitation: a systematic review. J Frailty Aging. 2017;6(1):37–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorman P, Slattery J, Farrell B, et al. Qualitative comparison of the reliability of health status assessments with the EuroQol and SF-36 questionnaires after stroke. United Kingdom Collaborators in the International Stroke Trial. Stroke. 1998;29:63–68.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lins L, Carvalho FM. SF-36 total score as a single measure of health-related quality of life: Scoping review. SAGE Open Medicine. 2016;4:2050312116671725.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 Item Short Form Health Survey (SF 36). 1. Conceptual framework and item selection. Medical Care. 1992;30:473–483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eriksson BG, Dey DK, Hessler RM, et al. Relationship between MNA and SF-36 in a free-living elderly population aged 70 to 75. J Nutrit Health Aging. 2005;9(4):212–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li TC, Lee YD, Lin CC, et al. Quality of life of primary caregivers of elderly with cerebrovascular disease or diabetes hospitalized for acute care: assessment of well-being and functioning using the SF-36 health questionnaire. Qual Life Res. 2004;13(6):1081–1088.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lima MG, Barros MB, Alves MC. Sleep duration and health status self-assessment (SF-36) in the elderly: a population-based study (ISA-Camp 2008). Cadernos de Saúde Pública. 2012;28(9):1674–1684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rampazo-Lacativa MK, Santos AA, Coimbra AM, et al. WOMAC and SF-36: instruments for evaluating the health-related quality of life of elderly people with total hip arthroplasty. A descriptive study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2015;133(4):290–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartsch LJ, Butterworth P, Byles JE, et al. Examining the SF-36 in an older population: analysis of data and presentation of Australian adult reference scores from the dynamic analyses to optimize ageing (DYNOPTA) project. Qual Life Res. 2011;20(8):1227–1236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterworth P, Crosier T. The validity of the SF-36 in an Australian National Household Survey: demonstrating the applicability of the Household Income and Labour Dynamics in Australia (HILDA) Survey to examination of health inequalities. BMC Public Health. 2004;4:44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwan YH, Yong ST, Fong W, et al. Reliability and validity of the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) health survey in patients with spondyloarthritis. Value Health. 2016;19(7):A854.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCullum J. The SF-36 in an Australian sample: validating a new, generic health status measure. Aust J Public Health. 1995;19:160–166.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stineman MG, Shea JA, Jette A, et al. The Functional Independence Measure: tests of scaling assumptions, structure, and reliability across 20 diverse impairment categories. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;77(1):1101–1108.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chumney D, Nollinger K, Shesko K, et al. Ability of Functional Independence Measure to accurately predict functional outcome of stroke-specific population: systematic review. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(1):17–30.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eyssen IC, Steultjens MP, Oud TA, et al. Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2011;48(5):517–528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IBM Corp. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. 5th ed. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Chernick M. Bootstrap methods: a guide for practitioners and researchers. New York: Wiley; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Davison AC, Hinkley DV. Bookstrap methods and their applications. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Walters SJ, Campbell MJ. The use of bootstrap methods for analysing health-related quality of life outcomes (particularly the SF-36). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2004;4(2):70.
   Google Scholar
• Ash JS, Cottrell E, Saxton L, et al. Patient narratives representing patient voices to inform research: A pilot qualitative Study. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;208:55–60.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tong A, Craig JC. (2016). Tuning into qualitative research—A channel for the patient voice. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2016;11(7):1128–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Carpenter C, Suto M. Ensuring the quality of qualitative research. In C Carpenter, M Suto (Eds.), Qualitative research for occupational and physical therapists: a practical guide. Ames, IA: Blackwell Publications; 2008. p. 21–39.
   Google Scholar
• van de Ven-Stevens LAW, Graff MJL, Peters MAM, et al. Construct validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in participants with tendon injury and Dupuytren disease. Physl Ther. 2015;95(5):750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kjeken I, Slatkowsky-Christensen B, Kvien TK, et al. Norwegian version of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in patients with hand osteoarthritis: validity, responsiveness, and feasibility. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;51(5):709–715.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cup EH, Scholte op Reimer WJ, et al. Reliability and validity of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure in stroke patients. Clin Rehabil. 2003;17(4):402–409.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons CD. Responsiveness of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for adults with ABI. Internat J Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;3:267.
   Google Scholar
• Smart A. A multi-dimensional model of clinical utility. Internat J Quality Health Care. 2006;18(5):377–382.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doig E, Fleming J, Kuipers P, et al. Clinical utility of the combined use of the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and goal attainment scaling. Am J Occup Ther. 2010;64(6):904–914.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yang S-Y, Lin C-Y, Lee Y-C, et al. The Canadian Occupational Performance Measure for patients with stroke: a systematic review. J Phys Ther Sci. 2017;29(3):548–555.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chen Y, Rodger S, Polatajko H. Experiences with the Canadian Occupational Performance Measure and client-centred practice in adult neurorehabilitation in Taiwan. Occup Ther Internat. 2002;9(3):167–184.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Collins L. Positioning occupational therapy in a changing health care landscape. AOTA Admin Manage Spec Interest Sec Q. 2013;29(4):1–2.
   Google Scholar
• Moore K, Cruickshank M, Haas M. Job satisfaction in occupational therapy: a qualitative investigation in urban Australia. Aust Occup Ther J. 2006;53(1):18–26.
   Google Scholar