Problematizing ‘productive citizenship’ within rehabilitation services: insights from three studies

References

• Laws J. Crackpots and basket-cases: a history of therapeutic work and occupation. History Hum Sci. 2011;24(2):65–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Obermann CE. A history of vocational rehabilitation in America. Reprint ed. New York (NY): Arno Press; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Stiker H-J. A history of disability. In: Mitchell DT, Snyder SL, editors. Corporealities: discourses of disability. English ed. Sayers W, translator; Ann Arbor (MI): The University of Michigan Press; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• McPherson KM, Gibson BE, Leplege A, editors. Rethinking rehabilitation: theory and practice. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Fadyl JK. Re-working disability: a Foucauldian discourse analysis of vocational rehabilitation in Aotearoa New Zealand [Doctoral thesis]: Auckland University of Technology; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Teachman G. Interrogating inclusion: Critical research with disabled youth who use augmentative and alternative communication [Doctoral Dissertation]: University of Toronto; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hamdani SS. Problematizing transition to adulthood for young disabled people [Doctoral Dissertation]: University of Toronto; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Oksala J. Feminism and neoliberal governmentality. Foucault Stud. 2013;16:32–53.
   Google Scholar
• Mavelli L. Governing the resilience of neoliberalism through biopolitics. Eur J Int Relat. 2017;23(3):489–512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carey AC. On the margins of citizenship: intellectual disabilty and civil rights in twentieth-century America. Philiadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor S. The right not to work: power and disability. Monthly Review: An independent socialist magazine [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2019 Jan 8]; 55(10):20. Available from: https://monthlyreview.org/2004/03/01/the-right-not-to-work-power-and-disability/
   Google Scholar
• Lister R. Inclusive citizenship: realizing the potential. Citizen Stud. 2007;11(1):49–61.
   Google Scholar
• Shildrick M. Embodying the monster: encounters with the vulnerable self. London: SAGE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Millar C. “body/freedom/art”: Rethinking disability through art: National Museum of American History; 2015 [cited 2019 Jan 8]. Available from: http://americanhistory.si.edu/blog/bodyfreedomart-rethinking-disability-through-art
   Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: optional protocol. Geneva: United Nations; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pass L. The productive citizen: Marx, cultural time, and disability. Stance. 2014;7:51–58.
   Google Scholar
• Hughes B. Disabled people as counterfeit citizens: the politics of resentment past and present. Disabil Soci. 2015;30(7):991–1004.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bath C, Karlsson R. The ignored citizen: young children’s subjectivities in Swedish and English early childhood education settings. Childhood. 2016;23(4):554–565.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadyl JK, McPherson K, Nicholls DA. Re/creating entrepreneurs of the self: discourses of worker and employee ‘value’ and current vocational rehabilitation practices. Sociol Health Illness. 2015;37(4):506–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Runswick-Cole K. 'Us' and 'them': the limits and possibilities of a 'politics of neurodiversity' in neoliberal times. Disabil Soci. 2014;29:1117–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lantz S, Marston G. Policy, citizenship and governance: the case of disability and employment policy in Australia. Disabil Soci. 2012;27:853–867.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith-Carrier T, Kerr D, Wang J, et al. Vestiges of the medical model: a critical exploration of the Ontario Disability Support Program in Ontario, Canada. Disabil Soci. 2017;32:1570–1591.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fadyl JK, Payne D. Socially constructed 'value' and vocational experiences following neurological injury. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(22):2165–2177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehmas S, Watson N. Exploring normativity in disability studies. Disabil Society. 2016;31(1):1–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey-Moodey A. Slow life and ecologies of sensation. Femin Rev. 2015;111:140–148.
   Google Scholar
• Ravaud J, Stiker H. Inclusion/exclusion: an analysis of historical and cultural meanings. In: Albrecht G, Seelman K, Bury M, editors. Handbook of disability studies. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2001. p. 490–512.
   Google Scholar
• Thomas C. How is disability understood? An examination of sociological approaches. Disabil Soci. 2010;19(6):569–583.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T, Cooper H, Bezmez D, et al. Rehabilitation as a disability equity issue: a conceptual shift for disability studies? Soc Inclusion. 2018;6(1):61–72.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whalley-Hammell K. Perspectives on disability & rehabilitation: contesting assumptions, challenging practice. Edinburgh: Church Livingstone Elsevier; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Gibson BE. Rehabilitation: a post-critical approach. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Eakin JM, Robertson A, Poland B, et al. Towards a critical social science perspective on health promotion research. Health Promot Int. 1996;11(2):157–165.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Teachman G, Gibson BE. Integrating visual methods with dialogical interviews in research with youth who use augmentative and alternative communication. Int J Qual Method. 2018;17(1). DOI:10.1177/1609406917750945
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. The logic of practice. Nice R, translator; Palo Alto (CA): Stanford University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu P. Distinction: a social critique of the judgement of taste. Nice R, translator; Cambridge (MA): Harvard University Press; 1984.
   Google Scholar
• Bacci C. Analysing policy: what's the problem represented to be? Frenchs Forest, NSW: Pearson Education; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Ontario Ministry of Education. Transition planning: A resource guide. Ontario: Ministry of Education; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Foucault M. The order of discourse. In: Young R, editor. Untying the text: a post-structuralist reader. Boston (MA): Routledge & Kegan Paul; 1981. p. 48–78.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes C. A working social model? Disability, work and disability politics in the 21st century. Critical Social Policy. 2000;20(4):441–457.
   Google Scholar
• Aurbach R. Breaking the web of needless disability. Work. 2014;48(4):591–607.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Beedholm K, Lomborg K, Frederiksen K. Ruptured thought: rupture as a critical attitude to nursing research. Nurs Phil. 2013;15:102–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goffman E. Stigma: notes on the management of spoiled identity. New York (NY): Simon & Schuster; 1963.
   Google Scholar
• Bright FAS, Kayes N, Cummins C, et al. Co-constructing engagement in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study exploring how practitioner engagement can influence patient engagement. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(10):1396–1405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmadottir G. Client-therapist relationships: Experiences of occupational therapy clients in rehabilitation. Br J Occup Ther. 2006;69(9):394–401.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins C. Neurorehabilitation: A disciplined disciplining discipline [Masters Thesis]: Auckland University of Technology; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Greco M, Stenner P. From paradox to pattern shift: conceptualising liminal hotspots and their affective dynamics. Theory Psychol. 2017;27(2):147–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galvin RD. Researching the disabled identity: contextualising the identity transformations which accompany the onset of impairment. Sociol Health Illness. 2005;27(3):393–413.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harlan SL, Robert PM. The social construction of disability in organizations: why employers resist reasonable accommodation. Work Occup. 1998;25:397–435.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown HK, Ouellette-Kuntz H, Lysaght R, et al. Students’ behavioural intentions towards peers with disability. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2011;24(4):322–332.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Njelesani J, Teachman G, Durocher E, et al. Thinking critically about client-centered practice and occupational possibilities across the life-span. Scand J Occup Ther. 2015;22(4):252–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Booher AK. Docile bodies, supercreips, and the plays of prosthetics. Int J Femin Approach Bioethics. 2010;3(2, Special Issue: Disability Studies in Feminist Bioethics):63–80.
   Google Scholar
• Roets G, Braidotti R. Nomadology and subjectivity: Deleuze, Guattari and Critical Disability Studies. In: Goodley D, Hughes B, Davis L, editors. Disabil Soc Theory. New York (NY): Palgrave Macmillan; 2012. p. 161–178.
   Google Scholar
• Goodley D, Brunswick-Cole K. Emancipating play: dis/abled children, development and deconstruction Disabil Soc. 2010;25(4):499–512.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis LJ. Introduction: disability, normality and power. In: Davis LJ, editor. Disabil Stud Reader. 4th ed. New York (NY): Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Thomson RG. Extraordinary bodies: figuring physical disability in American culture and literature. New York (NY): Columbia University Press; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Newsome R, Kendall E. Expansion rehabilitaiton: an empowering conceptual framework for rehabilitation following acquired disability. Austral J Rehabil Counsel. 1996;2(2):71–85.
   Google Scholar