Views of children with cerebral palsy and their parents on the effectiveness and acceptability of intensive speech therapy

References

• Nordberg A, Miniscalco C, Lohmander A, et al. Speech problems affect more than one in two children with cerebral palsy: Swedish population-based study. Acta Paediatrica, Int J Paediatr. 2013;102(2):161–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parkes J, Hill N, Platt MJ, et al. Oromotor dysfunction and communication impairments in children with cerebral palsy: a register study. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(12):1113–1119.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Cerebral Palsy Register Group. Report of the Australian Cerebral Palsy Register 2016. Birth years 1993–2009. Sydney, Australia: Cerebral Palsy Alliance and CP Register; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Ansel BM, Kent RD. Acoustic-phonetic contrasts and intelligibility in the dysarthria associated with mixed cerebral palsy. J Speech Hear Res. 1992;35(2):296–308.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Workinger MS, Kent RD. Perceptual analysis of the dysarthrias in children with athetoid and spastic cerebral palsy. In: Moore CA, Yorkston KM, Beukelman DR, editors. Dysarthria and apraxia of speech: perspectives on management. Baltimore: Paul Brookes; 1991. p. 109–126.
   Google Scholar
• Love RJ. Childhood motor speech disability. 2nd ed. Boston: Allyn & Bacon; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier J, Dickinson HO, Beckung E, et al. Participation in life situations of 8–12 year old children with cerebral palsy: cross sectional European study. BMJ. 2009;338:1458–1471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Parker NK, Kelly H, et al. Speech therapy for children with dysarthria acquired before three years of age. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(7):CD006937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boliek C, Fox C. Therapeutic effects of intensive voice treatment (LSVT LOUD®) for children with spastic cerebral palsy and dysarthria: a phase I treatment validation study. Int J Speech-Language Pathol. 2017;19(6):601–615.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Miller N, Robson S, et al. Intensive speech and language therapy for older children with cerebral palsy: a systems approach. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2010;52(4):337–344.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Roelant E, Thompson V, et al. Intensive dysarthria therapy for younger children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013;55:464–471.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maas E, Robin DA, H A, et al. Principles of motor learning in treatment of motor speech disorders. Am J Speech Lang Pathol. 2008;17:277–298.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt RA, Lee TD. Motor control and learning: a behavioral emphasis. 4th ed. Leeds: Human Kinetics Europe Ltd; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston M, Abraham C, et al. Making psychological theory useful for implementing evidence based practice: a consensus approach. Quality Safety Health Care. 2005;14:26–33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker N, Kelly H, Pennington L. Speech systems approach for dysarthria in cerebral palsy. In: Dodd B and Morgan A, editors. Intervention case studies of child speech impairment. Guildford, UK: J & R Press; 2017. p. 95–114.
   Google Scholar
• NICE. Cerebral palsy in under 25s: assessment and management. NICE guideline [NG62]. London: National Institute of Health and Care Excellence; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Watson RM, Pennington L. Assessment and management of the communication difficulties of children with cerebral palsy: a UK survey of SLT practice. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2015;50:241–259.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Stamp E, Smith J, et al. Internet delivery of intensive speech and language therapy for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility randomised controlled trial. BMJ Open. 2018; http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-024233.
   Google Scholar
• Bishop DV. Test of reception of grammar 2. Oxford: Pearson Assessment; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clark V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3:77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Tuckett AG. Applying thematic analysis theory to practice: a researcher's experience. Contemp Nurse. 2005;19:75–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Koch T, Harrington A. Reconceptualizing rigour: the case for reflexivity. J Adv Nurs. 1998;28:882–890.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fant G. Acoustic theory of speech production. The Hague, Netherlands: Mouton; 1960.
   Google Scholar
• Kent RD, Read C. The acoustic analysis of speech. San Diego, CA: Singular Publishing Group; 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Yorkston KM, Hakel M, Beukelman DR, et al. Evidence for effectiveness of treatment of loudness, rate or prosody in dysarthria: a systematic review. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2007;15:11–36.
   Google Scholar
• Pennington L, Lombardo E, Steen N, et al. Acoustic changes in the speech of children with cerebral palsy following an intensive program of dysarthria therapy. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2018;53:182–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fox C, Boliek C. Intensive voice treatment (LSVT LOUD) for children with spastic cerebral palsy and dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2012;55:930–945.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boliek C, Fox C. Individual and environmental contributions to treatment outcomes following a neuroplasticity-principled speech treatment (LSVT LOUD) in children with dysarthria secondary to cerebral palsy: a case study review. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2014;16:372–385.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Johnston MV, Francis J, et al. From theory to intervention: mapping theoretically derived behavioural determinants to behaviour change techniques. Appl Psychol. 2008;57:660–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord C, Rapley T, Marcroft C, et al. Determinants of parent-delivered therapy interventions in children with cerebral palsy: a qualitative synthesis and checklist. Child: Care Health Dev. 2018;44:659–669.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hustad KC. The relationship between listener comprehension and intelligibility scores for speakers with dysarthria. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2008;51:562–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, MacIntyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: new guidance. London: Medical Research Council; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Majnemer A, Shevell M, M L, et al. Participation and enjoyment of leisure activities in school-aged children with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50:751–758.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Geisthardt CL, Brotherson MJ, Cook CC. Friendships of children with disabilities in the home environment. Educ Train Mental Retard Dev Disabil. 2002;37:235–252.
   Google Scholar
• Mei C, Reilly S, Reddihough D, et al. Activities and participation of children with cerebral palsy: parent perspectives. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:2164–2173.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindsay S. Child and youth experiences and perspectives of cerebral palsy: a qualitative systematic review. Child: Care Health Dev. 2016;42:153–175.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michelsen S, Uldall P, Kejs AMT, et al. Education and employment prospects in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2005;47:511–517.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sekhon M, Cartwright M, Francis JJ. Acceptability of healthcare interventions: an overview of reviews and development of a theoretical framework. BMC Health Serv Res. 2017;17:88.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Murray E, Treweek S, Pope C, et al. Normalisation process theory: a framework for developing, evaluating and implementing complex interventions. BMC Med. 2010;8:63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dirks T, Hadders-Algra M. The role of the family in intervention of infants at high risk of cerebral palsy: a systematic analysis. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2017;53:62–67.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman MA, Israel BA, Schulz A, et al. Further explorations in empowerment theory: an empirical analysis of empowerment theory. Am J Community Psychol. 1992;20:707–727.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beresford B, Clarke S, Maddison J. Therapy interventions for children with neurodisabilities: a qualitative scoping study. Health Technol Assess. 2018;22:1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar