The impact of aphasia on Internet and technology use

References

• Elman RJ. The Internet and aphasia: crossing the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2001;15:895–899.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van de Sandt-Koenderman ME. Aphasia rehabilitation and the role of computer technology: can we keep up with modern times? Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2011;13:21–27.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ghidella C, Murray S, Smart M, et al. Aphasia websites: an examination of their quality and communicative accessibility. Aphasiology. 2005;19:1134–1146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Menger F, Morris J, Salis C. Aphasia in an Internet age: wider perspectives on digital inclusion. Aphasiology. 2016;30:112–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Fudge N, Redfern J, et al. Self-reported long-term needs after stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:1398–1403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Helsper EJ. Digital Inclusion: an analysis of social disadvantage and the information society. London (UK): The London School of Economics and Political Science; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Egan J, Worrall L, Oxenham D. Accessible Internet training package helps people with aphasia cross the digital divide. Aphasiology. 2004;18:265–280.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly H, Kennedy F, Britton H, et al. Narrowing the “digital divide”—facilitating access to computer technology to enhance the lives of those with aphasia: a feasibility study. Aphasiology. 2016;30:133–163.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koss V, Azad S, Gurm A, et al. “This is for everyone”: the case for universal digitisation. New York (NY): Booz & Company; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Pricewaterhouse Coopers LLP. Champion for digital inclusion: the economic case for digital inclusion. 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Communications Consumer Panel. Delivering digital participation: the consumer perspective. London: Communications Consumer Panel; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Green M, Rossall P. Digital Inclusion Evidence Report. Age Uk; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• UK Online Centres. Digital inclusion, social impact: a research study. Ipsos MORI; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Caute A, Woolf C. Using voice recognition software to improve communicative writing and social participation in an individual with severe acquired dysgraphia: an experimental single-case therapy study. Aphasiology. 2016;30:245–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Al Mahmud A, Martens J-B. Amail: design and evaluation of an accessible email tool for persons with aphasia. Interact Comp. 2013;25:351–374.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elman RJ. Larsen S. Computer and Internet use among people with aphasia (oral presentation). In: Clinical Aphasiology Conference. Isle of Palms, SC; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Finch E, Hill AJ. Computer use by people with aphasia: a survey investigation. Brain Impairment. 2014;15:107–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandenburg C, Worrall L, Rodriguez AD, et al. Mobile computing technology and aphasia: an integrated review of accessibility and potential uses. Aphasiology. 2013;27:444–461.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer R, Cooper C, Enderby P, et al. Clinical and cost effectiveness of computer treatment for aphasia post stroke (Big CACTUS): study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zheng C, Lynch L, Taylor N. Effect of computer therapy in aphasia: a systematic review. Aphasiology. 2016;30:211–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall N, Boisvert M, Steele R. Telepractice in the assessment and treatment of individuals with aphasia: a systematic review. Int J Telerehab. 2013;5:27–38.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hill AJ, Theodoros DG, Russell TG, et al. The effects of aphasia severity on the ability to assess language disorders via telerehabilitation. Aphasiology. 2009;23:627–642.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton WH, Helsper EJ, Gerber MM. The Internet in Britain. Oxford (UK): Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Helsper EJ, Reisdorf BC. A quantitative examination of explanations for reasons for Internet nonuse. Cyberpsychol, Behav Social Network. 2013;16:94–99.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton WH, Blank G, Groselj D. Cultures of the internet : the internet in Britain. Oxford (UK): Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Parr S. Everyday reading and writing practices of normal adults: implications for aphasia assessment. Aphasiology. 1992;6:273–283.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustavsson M, Ytterberg C, Tham K, et al. Experiences of using information and communication technology within the first year after stroke - a grounded theory study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40:561–568.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dutton WH, Blank G. Next generation users: the internet in Britain. Oxford (UK): Oxford Internet Institute, University of Oxford; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Internet access - households and individuals. Statistical Bull. 2017.
   Google Scholar
• De Jong-Hagelstein M, Kros L, Lingsma HF, et al. Expert versus proxy rating of verbal communicative ability of people with aphasia after stroke. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2012;18:1064–1070.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cruice M, Worrall L, Hickson L, et al. Measuring quality of life: comparing family members’ and friends’ ratings with those of their aphasic partners. Aphasiology. 2005;19:111–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulder M, Nijland R. Stroke impact scale. J Physiother. 2016;62:117.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chang J, McAllister C, McCaslin R. Correlates of, and barriers to, Internet use among older adults. J Gerontol Soc Work. 2015;58:66–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Deursen AJAM, Helsper EJ. A nuanced understanding of Internet use and non-use amongst the elderly. Eur J Commun. 2015;30:171–187.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faircloth CA, Boylstein C, Rittman M, et al. Sudden illness and biographical flow in narratives of stroke recovery. Sociol Health Illn. 2004;26:242–261.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nasr N, Mawson S, Wright P, et al. Exploring the experiences of living with stroke through narrative: Stroke survivors’ perspectives. Global Qual Nursing Res. 2016:3:1–9.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. Human rights council oral revisions of 30 june. Agenda item 3. The Promotion, Protection, and Enjoyment of Human Rights on the Internet; 2016. p. 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Bhatnagar P, Scarborough P, Smeeton NC, et al. The incidence of all stroke and stroke subtype in the United Kingdom, 1985 to 2008: a systematic review. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:539.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dickinson A, Eisma R, Gregor P. The barriers that older novices encounter to computer use. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2011;10:261–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaplan E. The assessment of aphasia and related disorders. Baltimore (MD): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 1983.
   Google Scholar
• Herbert R, Haw C, Brown C, et al. Accessible information guidelines: making information accessible for people with aphasia. London (UK): The Stroke Association; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Rose TA, Worrall LE, Hickson LM, et al. Aphasia friendly written health information: content and design characteristics. Int J Speech-Lang Pathol. 2011;13:335–347.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearl G. Engaging with people who have aphasia. A set of resources for stroke researchers. NHS National Institute for Health Research; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Newcastle University. Aphasia Research User Group (ARUG). 2017 [cited 2017 May 20]. Available from: http://www.ncl.ac.uk/ecls/research/speechlanguage/arug/#ourservices
   Google Scholar
• Friemel TN. The digital divide has grown old: determinants of a digital divide among seniors. New Media & Society. 2016;18:313–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for National Statistics. Internet users in the UK : 2016. Statistical Bull. 2016;1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Tabachnick BG, Fidell LS. Using Multivariate Statistics. 6th ed. Boston (MA): Pearson; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Northcott S, Moss B, Harrison K, et al. A systematic review of the impact of stroke on social support and social networks: associated factors and patterns of change. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:811–831.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hilari K, Northcott S. “Struggling to stay connected”: comparing the social relationships of healthy older people and people with stroke and aphasia. Aphasiology. 2017;31:674–687.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pluta A, Ulatowska H, Gawron N, et al. A thematic framework of illness narratives produced by stroke patients. Disab Rehab. 2015;37:1170–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitzmüller G, Häggström T, Asplund K. Living an unfamiliar body: The significance of the long-term influence of bodily changes on the perception of self after stroke. Med Health Care Philos. 2013;16:19–29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliot AJ, Mooney CJ, Douthit KZ, et al. Predictors of older adults’ technology use and its relationship to depressive symptoms and well-being. J Gerontol Series B: Psycho Sci Soc Sci. 2014;69:667–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Czaja SJ, Lee CC. The impact of aging on access to technology. Univ Access Inf Soc. 2007;5:341–349.
   Google Scholar
• Quan‐Haase A, Martin K, Schreurs K. Interviews with digital seniors: ICT use in the context of everyday life. InfoCommun Soc. 2016;4:691–707.
   Google Scholar
• Wandke H, Sengpiel M, Sönksen M. Myths about older people’s use of information and communication technology. Gerontology. 2012;58:564–570.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hanson VL. Age and web access: The next generation. In: Proceedings of the W4A’09. Madrid, Spain: Association for Computing Machinery; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Simpson J. Inclusive information and communication technologies for people with disabilities. Disab Stud Quart. 2009;29. Available from: http://dsq-sds.org/article/view/167/167
   Google Scholar
• Beeson PM, Higginson K, Rising K. Writing treatment for aphasia: a texting approach. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2013;56:945–955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dietz A, Ball A, Griffith J. Reading and writing with aphasia in the 21st century: technological applications of supported reading comprehension and written expression. Topic Stroke Rehab. 2011;18:758–769.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thiel L, Sage K, Conroy P. Promoting linguistic complexity, greater message length and ease of engagement in email writing in people with aphasia: initial evidence from a study utilizing assistive writing software. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2016;52:106–124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank G, Dutton WH. Age and trust in the internet: the centrality of experience and attitudes toward technology in Britain. Soc Sci Comp Rev. 2012;30:135–151.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Caute A, Cruice M, Friede A, et al. Rekindling the love of books – a pilot project exploring whether e-readers help people to read again after a stroke. Aphasiology. 2016;30:290–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren M. The digital vicious cycle: Links between social disadvantage and digital exclusion in rural areas. Telecommun Policy. 2007;31:374–388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blank G, Graham M, Calvino C. Local geographies of digital inequality. Soc Sci Comp Rev. 2017;36:1–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar