Implementation in rehabilitation: a roadmap for practitioners and researchers

References

• Kamper SJ, Moseley AM, Herbert RD. 15 years of tracking physiotherapy evidence on PEDro, where are we now? Br J Sports Med. 2015; 49:907–909.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• AVERT Trial Collaboration Group. Efficacy and safety of very early mobilisation within 24 hours of stroke onset (AVERT): a randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2015;386:46–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Farmer SE, Brady MC, et al. Interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;11:CD010820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jette DU, Bacon K, Batty C. Evidence-based practice: beliefs, attitudes, knowledge, and behaviors of physical therapists. Phys Ther. 2003;83:786–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iles R, Davidson M. Evidence based practice: a survey of physiotherapists' current practice. Physiother Res Int. 2006; 11:93–103.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Hodder RK, Wolfenden L, Kamper SJ, et al. Developing implementation science to improve the translation of research to address low back pain: a critical review. Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2016;30:1050–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holden MA, Nicholls EE, Hay EM, et al. Physical therapists' use of therapeutic exercise for patients with clinical knee osteoarthritis in the United kingdom: in line with current recommendations? Phys Ther. 2008;88:1109–1121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Guilcher SJT, Jaglal SB. Determinants of research use in clinical decision making among physical therapists providing services post-stroke: a cross-sectional study. Implement Sci. 2010;5:77.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liddle SD, David Baxter G, Gracey JH. Physiotherapists' use of advice and exercise for the management of chronic low back pain: a national survey. Man Ther. 2009;14:189–196.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Johansson K, Nilsen P, et al. Determinants of guideline use in primary care physical therapy: a cross-sectional survey of attitudes, knowledge, and behavior. Phys Ther. 2014;94:343–354.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindström A-C, Bernhardsson S. Evidence-based practice in primary care occupational therapy: a survey in Western Sweden. Occup Ther Int. 2018;2018:1.
   Google Scholar
• Royal College of Physicians. National sentinel stroke audit 2010. London: Clinical Effectiveness and Evaluation Unit, Royal College of Physicians.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Larsson ME, Eggertsen R, et al. Evaluation of a tailored, multi-component intervention for implementation of evidence-based clinical practice guidelines in primary care physical therapy: a non-randomized controlled trial. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14:105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Korner-Bitensky NJ, Desrosiers J, Rochette A. A national survey of occupational therapists' practices related to participation post-stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:291–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mikhail C. Physical therapists’ use of interventions with high evidence of effectiveness in the management of a hypothetical typical patient with acute low back pain. Phys Ther. 2005;85:11.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Öberg B, Johansson K, et al. Clinical practice in line with evidence? A survey among primary care physiotherapists in western Sweden. J Eval Clin Pract. 2015;21:1169–1177.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGlynn EA, Asch SM, Adams J, et al. The quality of health care delivered to adults in the United States. New Engl J Med. 2003;348:2635–2645.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solomon MZ. The ethical urgency of advancing implementation science. Am J Bioethics. 2010;10:31–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salbach NM, Wood-Dauphinee S, Desrosiers J, et al. Facilitated interprofessional implementation of a physical rehabilitation guideline for stroke in inpatient settings: process evaluation of a cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2017;4:50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Damschroder LJ, Aaron DC, Keith RE, et al. Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: a consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implement Sci. 2009;4:50. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-4-50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Madon T, Hofman KJ, Kupfer L, et al. Public health. Implementation science. Science. 2007;318:1728–1729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Mittman BS. Welcome to implementation science. Implement Sci. 2006;1:1. DOI:10.1186/1748-5908-1-1.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang ES, Wyer PC, Haynes RB. Knowledge translation: closing the evidence-to-practice gap. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:355–363.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Holmqvist LW. Early supported discharge trialists. Early supported discharge after stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39:269–269.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, et al. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Cont Educ Health Prof. 2006;26:13–24.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ, Gaynor C, Kerr M, et al. A consensus on stroke: early supported discharge. Stroke. 2011;42:1392–1397.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chouliara N, Fisher RJ, Kerr M, et al. Implementing evidence-based stroke early supported discharge services: a qualitative study of challenges, facilitators and impact. Clin Rehabil. 2014;28:370–377.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cobley CS, Fisher RJ, Chouliara N, et al. A qualitative study exploring patients’ and carers’ experiences of Early Supported Discharge services after stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27:750–757.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher RJ, Cobley CS, Potgieter I, et al. Is stroke early supported discharge still effective in practice? A prospective comparative study. Clin Rehabil. 2016;30:268–276.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Watkins CL, et al. Therapists' use of the Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) intervention: a practice implementation survey study. Phys Ther. 2014;94:632–643.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Harris JE, et al. A formative evaluation of the implementation of an upper limb stroke rehabilitation intervention in clinical practice: a qualitative interview study. Implement Sci. 2014;9:90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Tyson SF, et al. Case series of a knowledge translation intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Phys. Ther. 2016;96:930–1937.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Tyson SF, et al. Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Tyson SF, et al. Mechanisms of action of an implementation intervention in stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016;1:534.
   Google Scholar
• Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, editors. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care. 2nd ed. Oxford: John Wiley & Sons; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Larsson ME. Does a tailored guideline implementation strategy have an impact on clinical physiotherapy practice? A nonrandomized controlled study. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;1–10. [e-pub ahead of print].
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mudge S, Sezier A, Payne D, et al. Developing and putting into practice a Living Well Toolkit: a pilot study drawing on normalisation process theory. Presented at New Zealand Rehabilitation Association Conference. 2017; Christchurch, New Zealand.
   Google Scholar
• Sezier A, Mudge S, Kayes S, et al. Development of a toolkit to enhance care processes for people with a long-term neurological condition: a qualitative descriptive study. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e022038.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Dijkers MP, Murphy SL, Krellman J. Evidence-based practice for rehabilitation professionals: concepts and controversies. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2012;93:S164–S176.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenhalgh T. Of lamp posts, keys, and fabled drunkards: a perspectival tale of 4 guidelines. J Eval Clin Pract. 2018;24:1132–1138.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen SJ, Graham ID. From knowledge translation to engaged scholarship: promoting research relevance and utilization. Arch Phys Med Rehab. 2013;94:S3–S8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cadilhac DA, Andrew NE, Stroil Salama E, On behalf of the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry Consortium, et al. Improving discharge care: the potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before–after pilot study. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e016010.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Power M, Tyrell P, Rudd AG, et al. Did a quality improvement collaborative make stroke care better? A cluster randomized trial. Implement Sci. 2014;9:40.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Papoutsi C, Boden R, Foy R, et al. Challenges for implementation science. In: Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, et al., editors. Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. Vol. 16. Health Services and Delivery Research. Southampton (UK): NIHR Journals Library; 2016. p. 121–131.
   Google Scholar
• Howarth E, Denvers K, Moore G, et al. Contextual issues and qualitative research. In: Raine R, Fitzpatrick R, Barratt H, Bevan G, Black N, Boaden, R, et al. Challenges, solutions and future directions in the evaluation of service innovations in health care and public health. Health Serv Deliv Res. 2016;4(16);105–117.
   Google Scholar
• Bayley MT, Hurdowar A, Richards CL, et al. Barriers to implementation of stroke rehabilitation evidence: findings from a multi-site pilot project. Disabil Rehab. 2012;34:1633–1638.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May CR, Mair F, Finch T, et al. Development of a theory of implementation and integration: normalization process theory. Implement Sci. 2009;4:29.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bate P, Robert G, Fulop N, et al. Perspectives on context: a collection of essays considering the role of context in successful quality improvement. London: The Health Foundation; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions. Complex interventions in health: an overview of research methods 2015;350:1258.
   Google Scholar
• May CR, Johnson M, Finch T. Implementation, context and complexity. Implement Sci. 2016;11:141.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kersten P, Ellis-Hill C, McPherson KM, et al. Beyond the RCT–understanding the relationship between interventions, individuals and outcome – the example of neurological rehabilitation. Disabil Rehab. 2010;32:1028–1034.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rycroft-Malone J, Bucknall T, editors. Evidence based nursing series, Volume 2. Models and frameworks for implementing evidence-based practice: linking evidence to action. Singapore: John Wiley & Sons; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Hudon A, Gervais MJ, Hunt M. The contribution of conceptual frameworks to knowledge translation interventions in physical therapy. Phys Ther. 2015;95:630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liang L, Bernhardsson S, Vernooij RW, et al. Members of the Guidelines International Network Implementation Working Group. Use of theory to plan or evaluate guideline implementation among physicians: a scoping review. Implement Sci. 2017;12:26.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Colquhoun HL, Letts LJ, Law MC, et al. A scoping review of the use of theory in studies of knowledge translation. Can J Occup Ther. 2010;77:270–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Birken SA, Powell BJ, Shea CM, et al. Criteria for selecting implementation science theories and frameworks: results from an international survey. Implement Sci. 2017;12:124.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones CA, Roop SC, Pohar SL, et al. Translating knowledge in rehabilitation: systematic review. Phys Ther. 2015;95:663–677.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bekkering G, Hendriks HJ, van Tulder MW, et al. Effect on the process of care of an active strategy to implement clinical guidelines on physiotherapy for low back pain: a cluster randomised controlled trial. BMJ Qual Safe. 2005;14:107–112.
   Google Scholar
• Menon A, Korner-Bitensky N, Kastner M, et al. Strategies for rehabilitation professionals to move evidence-based knowledge into practice: a systematic review. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:1024–1032.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glegg SM, Holsti L, Stanton S, et al. Evaluating change in virtual reality adoption for brain injury rehabilitation following knowledge translation. Disabil Rehab: Assist Tech. 2017;12:217–226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levac D, Glegg SM, Camden C, et al. Best practice recommendations for the development, implementation, and evaluation of online knowledge translation resources in rehabilitation. Phys Ther. 2015;95:648–662.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardsson S, Lynch E, Dizon JM, et al. Advancing evidence-based practice in physical therapy settings: multinational perspectives on implementation strategies and interventions. Phys Ther. 2016;97:51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton-McHarg T, Young SL, Tzelepis F, et al. Psychometric properties of implementation measures for public health and community settings and mapping of constructs against the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2016;11:148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leeman J, Birkin SA, Powell BJ, et al. Beyond “implementation strategies”: classifying the full range of strategies used in implementation science and practice. Implement Sci. 2017;12:125.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey G, Kitson A. PARIHS revisited: from heuristic to integrated framework for the successful implementation of knowledge into practice. Implement Sci. 2015;11:33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barwick M. Checklist to Assess Organizational Readiness (CARI) for EIP implementation. Toronto: Hospital for Sick Children; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Rapley T, Girling M, Mair F, et al. Improving the normalization of complex interventions: part 1 - development of the NoMAD instrument for assessing implementation work based on normalization process theory (NPT). BMC Med Res Methodol. 2018;18:133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Dusseldorp E, et al. Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014;9:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alcalde-Rabanal JE, Becerril-Montekio VM, Langlois EV. Evaluation of communities of Practice performance developing implementation research to enhance maternal health decision-making in Mexico and Nicaragua. Implement Sci. 2018;13:41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella E, Caty M. Reflective practice for allied health: theory and applications. In: English L, editor. Adult education and health. London: University of Toronto Press; 2012. p. 210–228.
   Google Scholar
• Jones F, Bailey N. How can we train stroke practitioners about patient self-management? Description and evaluation of a pathway wide training programme. Eur J Person Centered Healthcare. 2013;1:246–254.
   Google Scholar
• Ward VL, House A, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: the missing link in the evidence to action chain? Evid Policy. 2009;5:267–279.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ward VL, House A, Hamer S. Knowledge brokering: exploring the process of transferring knowledge into action. BMC Health Serv Res. 2009;9:12.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters DH. Implementation research: what it is and how to do it. BMJ. 2013;347:f6753.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kindon S, Pain R, Kesby M, editors. Participatory action research: approaches and methods. London: Routledge; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Pawson R, Tilley N. Realistic evaluation. London: Sage Publications; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, et al. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011;38:65–76.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haji F, Morin MP, Parker K. Rethinking programme evaluation in health professions education: beyond 'did it work?' Med Educ. 2013;47:342–351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bar-Yam Y. Complexity rising: from human beings to human civilization, a complexity profile. Cambridge, MA: NESCO Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Deming WE. The new economics for industry, government & education. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Center for Advanced Engineering Study; 1993.
   Google Scholar
• Sanders J, Fitzpatrick JM. Improving service user self-management: development and implementation of a strategy for the Richmond Response and Rehabilitation Team. BMJ Open Qual. 2017;6:e000126.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Chambers DA, Glasgow, Stange KC. The dynamic sustainability framework: addressing the paradox of sustainment amid ongoing change. Implement Sci. 2013;8:117.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar