The validity and accuracy of wrist-worn activity monitors in lower-limb prosthesis users

References

• Ziegler-Graham K, MacKenzie EJ, Ephraim PL, et al. Estimating the prevalence of limb loss in the United States: 2005 to 2050. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89:422–429.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton RJ, Murray AM, Stevens-Lapsley JE, et al. Physical activity, ambulation, and comorbidities in people with diabetes and lower-limb amputation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2016;53:1069–1078.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Thompson WR. Worldwide survey of fitness trends for 2016. ACSM's Health Fitness J. 2017;20:8–17.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow JJ, Thom JM, Wewege MA, et al. Accuracy of step count measured by physical activity monitors: the effect of gait speed and anatomical placement site. Gait Posture. 2017;57:199–203.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu AH, Ng SH, Paknezhad M, et al. Comparison of wrist-worn Fitbit Flex and waist-worn ActiGraph for measuring steps in free-living adults. PloS One. 2017;12:e0172535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Imboden MT, Nelson MB, Kaminsky LA, et al. Comparison of four Fitbit and Jawbone activity monitors with a research-grade ActiGraph accelerometer for estimating physical activity and energy expenditure. Br J Sports Med. 2017;52:844–850.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gomersall SR, Ng N, Burton NW, et al. Estimating physical activity and sedentary behavior in a free-living context: a pragmatic comparison of consumer-based activity trackers and ActiGraph accelerometry. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mahlknecht P, Kiechl S, Bloem BR, et al. Prevalence and burden of gait disorders in elderly men and women aged 60-97 years: a population-based study. PLoS One. 2013;8:e69627.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen G, Patten C, Kothari DH, et al. Gait differences between individuals with post-stroke hemiparesis and non-disabled controls at matched speeds. Gait Posture. 2005;22:51–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winters TF, Gage JR, Hicks R. Gait patterns in spastic hemiplegia in children and young adults. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1987;69:437–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cutti AG, Verni G, Migliore GL. Reference values for gait temporal and loading symmetry of lower-limb amputees can help in refocusing rehabilitation targets. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2018;5:61.
   Google Scholar
• Floegel TA, Florez-Pregonero A, Hekler EB, et al. Validation of consumer-based hip and wrist activity monitors in older adults with varied ambulatory abilities. J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2017;72:229–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fulk GD, Combs SA, Danks KA, et al. Accuracy of 2 activity monitors in detecting steps in people with stroke and traumatic brain injury. Phys Ther. 2014;94:222–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffer SD, Holzapfel SD, Fulk G, et al. Step count accuracy and reliability of two activity tracking devices in people after stroke. Physiother Theory Prac. 2017;33:788–796.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gorter JW, Noorduyn SG, Obeid J, et al. Accelerometry: a feasible method to quantify physical activity in ambulatory and nonambulatory adolescents with cerebral palsy. Int J Pediatr. 2012;2012:1.
   Google Scholar
• O’ Donoghue D, Kennedy N. Validity of an activity monitor in young people with cerebral palsy gross motor function classification system level I. Physiol Meas. 2014;35:2307–2318.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Neil ME, Fragala-Pinkham MA, Forman JL, et al. Measuring reliability and validity of the ActiGraph GT3X accelerometer for children with cerebral palsy: a feasibility study. J Pediatr Rehabil Med. 2014;7:233–240.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ramstrand N, Nilsson KA. Validation of a patient activity monitor to quantify ambulatory activity in an amputee population. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2007;31:157–166.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bussmann JB, Culhane KM, Horemans HL, et al. Validity of the prosthetic activity monitor to assess the duration and spatio-temporal characteristics of prosthetic walking. IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng. 2004;12:379–386.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudek NL, Khan OD, Lemaire ED, et al. Ambulation monitoring of transtibial amputation subjects with patient activity monitor versus pedometer. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2008;45:577–585.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Albert MV, Deeny S, McCarthy C, et al. Monitoring daily function in persons with transfemoral amputations using a commercial activity monitor: a feasibility study. PM R. 2014;6:1120–1127.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA. 2007;298:2296–2304.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tudor-Locke C. Taking steps toward increasing physical activity: using pedometers to measure and motivate. Res Dig. 2002;3:1–8.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson PD, Buchner D, Piña IL, et al. Exercise and physical activity in the prevention and treatment of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a statement from the Council on Clinical Cardiology (Subcommittee on Exercise, Rehabilitation, and Prevention) and the Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism (Subcommittee on Physical Activity). Circulation. 2003;107:3109–3116.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sigal RJ, Kenny GP, Wasserman DH, et al. Physical activity/exercise and Type 2 diabetes. A consensus statement from the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2006;29:1433–1438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hatano Y. Use of the pedometer for promoting daily walking exercise. J Int Commit Health Physic Educ Recr. 1993;29:4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Schneider PL, Crouter S, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:331–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briseno GG, Smith JD. Pedometer accuracy in persons using lower-limb prostheses. J Prosthet Orthot. 2014;26:87–92.
   Google Scholar
• Ehrler F, Weber C, Lovis C. Influence of pedometer position on pedometer accuracy at various walking speeds: a comparative study. J Med Internet Res. 2016;18:e268.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holbrook EA, Barreira TV, Kang M. Validity and reliability of Omron pedometers for prescribed and self-paced walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:670–674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vincent WJ. Analysis of variance with repeated measures. Statistics in Kinesiology. 3rd ed. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1:301–310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Giannakidou DM, Kambas A, Ageloussis N, et al. The validity of two Omron pedometers during treadmill walking is speed dependent. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012;112:49–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hasson RE, Haller J, Pober DM, et al. Validity of the Omron HJ-112 pedometer during treadmill walking. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2009;41:805–809.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen MD, Kuo CC, Pellegrini CA, et al. Accuracy of wristband activity monitors during ambulation and activities. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016;48:1942–1949.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wahl Y, Düking P, Droszez A, et al. Criterion-validity of commercially available physical activity tracker to estimate step count, covered distance and energy expenditure during sports conditions. Front Physiol. 2017;8:725.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fokkema T, Kooiman TJ, Krijnen WP, et al. Reliability and validity of ten consumer activity trackers depend on walking speed. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2017;49:793–800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehrler F, Weber C, Lovis C. Positioning commercial pedometers to measure activity of older adults with slow gait: at the wrist or at the waist? Stud Health Technol Inform. 2016;221:18–22.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Diaz KM, Krupka DJ, Chang MJ, et al. Fitbit®: an accurate and reliable device for wireless physical activity tracking. Int J Cardiol. 2015;185:138–140.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sushames A, Edwards A, Thompson F, et al. Validity and reliability of Fitbit Flex for step count, moderate to vigorous physical activity and activity energy expenditure. PloS One. 2016;11:e0161224.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• An HS, Jones GC, Kang SK, et al. How valid are wearable physical activity trackers for measuring steps? Eur J Sport Sci. 2017;17:360–368.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chu CK, Wong MS. Comparison of prosthetic outcomes between adolescent transtibial and transfemoral amputees after Sichuan earthquake using Step Activity Monitor and Prosthesis Evaluation Questionnaire. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2016;40:58–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wurdeman SR, Stevens PM, Campbell JH. Mobility Analysis of AmpuTees (MAAT I): quality of life and satisfaction are strongly related to mobility for patients with a lower limb prosthesis. Prosthet Orthot Int. 2018;42:498–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar