710
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

The implications of the Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations for design and allocation of rehabilitation after hospital discharge: a problematization

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , , , , , , , , & show all
Pages 3403-3415 | Received 07 Feb 2018, Accepted 05 Mar 2019, Published online: 11 Apr 2019

References

  • Ma VY, Chan L, Carruthers KJ. Incidence, prevalence, costs, and impact on disability of common conditions requiring rehabilitation in the united states: Stroke, spinal cord injury, traumatic brain injury, multiple sclerosis, osteoarthritis, rheumatoid arthritis, limb loss, and back pain [Internet]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:986–995.e1.
  • Jolliffe L, Lannin NA, Cadilhac DA. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries [Internet]. BMJ Open. 2018;8:e018791. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018791.
  • Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: Stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015 [Internet]. Int J Stroke. 2016;11:459–484.
  • Kapral MK, Fang J, Silver FL, et al. Effect of a provincial system of stroke care delivery on stroke care and outcomes. CMAJ. 2013;185:E483–E491.
  • Saposnik G, Kapral MK, Coutts SB, et al. Do all age groups benefit from organized inpatient stroke care? [Internet]. Stroke. 2009;40:3321–3327.
  • Huang K, Khan N, Kwan A, et al. Socioeconomic status and care after stroke: Results from the registry of the Canadian Stroke Network [Internet]. Stroke. 2013;44:477–482.
  • Cott CA, Graham JV, Brunton K. When will the evidence catch up with clinical practice? Physiother Can. 2011;63:387–390.
  • Burgers J, Smolders M, van der Weijden T, et al. Clinical practice guidelines as a tool for improving patient care. In: Grol R, Wensing M, Eccles M, et al. editors. Improving patient care: the implementation of change in health care [Internet]. Chichester: Wiley Online Library; 2013. p. 91–114.
  • Reed MC, Wood V, Harrington R, et al. Developing stroke rehabilitation and community services: a meta-synthesis of qualitative literature [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil. 2012;34:553–563.
  • Alvesson M, Sandberg J. Generation research questions through problematization [Internet]. Acad Manag Rev. 2017;36:247–271.
  • Verheyden G, Nieuwboer A, De Wit L, et al. Time course of trunk, arm, leg, and functional recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22:173–179.
  • Viscogliosi C, Belleville S, Desrosiers J, et al. Participation after a stroke: changes over time as a function of cognitive deficits. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2011;52:336–343.
  • Davis CG, Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Adaptation following stroke: a personal projects analysis [Internet]. Rehabil Psychol. 2013;58:287–298.
  • Lindsay M, Gubitz G, Bayley M, et al.; On behalf of the Canadian Stroke Best Practices Advisory Committee and Writing Groups. Canadian stroke best practice overview and methodology. 5th ed. Ottawa (ON): Heart and Stroke Foundation, Canada; 2014.
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada. Different strokes: recovery triumphs and challenges at any age. 2017 Stroke Report. 2017; 1-16.
  • Daniels N. Just health: Meeting health needs fairly. 1st ed. New York: Cambridge University Press; 2008.
  • Blacquiere D, Lindsay MP, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: telestroke best practice guidelines update 2017 [Internet]. Int J Stroke. 2017;12:886–895.
  • Linton S. Disability studies/not disability studies [Internet]. Disabil Soc. 1998;13:525–539.
  • Wiles R, Ashburn A, Payne S, et al. Discharge from physiotherapy following stroke [Internet]. Soc Sci Med. 2004;59:1263–1273.
  • Jones F, McKevitt C, Riazi A, et al. How is rehabilitation with and without an integrated self-management approach perceived by UK community-dwelling stroke survivors? A qualitative process evaluation to explore implementation and contextual variations [Internet]. BMJ Open. 2017;7:e014109. Available from: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2016-014109
  • Morris JH, Williams B. Optimising long-term participation in physical activities after stroke: exploring new ways of working for physiotherapists. Physiotherapy. 2009;95:227–233.
  • Kapoor A, Lanctôt KL, Bayley M, et al. “Good outcome” isn't good enough: cognitive impairment, depressive symptoms, and social restrictions in physically recovered stroke patients. Stroke. 2017;48:1688–1690.
  • Wolf TJ, Baum C, Connor LT. Changing face of stroke: implications for occupational therapy practice [Internet]. Am J Occup Ther. 2009;63:621–625.
  • World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability, and health. 2001:1-315.
  • Bergström A, Guidetti S, Tham K. Association between satisfaction and participation in everyday occupations after stroke [Internet]. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24:339-348.
  • Salter K, Hellings C, Foley N, et al. The experience of living with stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40:595-602.
  • Rochette A, Desrosiers J, Noreau L. Association between personal and environmental factors and the occurrence of handicap situations following a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2001;23:559–569.
  • Kessler D, Dubouloz CJ, Urbanowski R, et al. Meaning perspective transformation following stroke: the process of change [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil. 2009;31:1056–1065.
  • Amundson R. Against normal function. Stud Hist Philos Biol Biomed Sci. 2000;31:33–53.
  • Mallett R, Runswick-Cole K. Approaching disability: critical issues and perspectives. New York (NY): Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group; 2014.
  • Wallenbert I, Jonsson H. Waiting to get better: a dilemma regarding habits in daily occupations after stroke [Internet]. Am J Occup Ther. 2005;59:218–224.
  • McEwen S, Polatajko H, Baum C, et al. Combined cognitive-strategy and task-specific training improve transfer to untrained activities in subacute stroke: an exploratory randomized controlled trial [Internet]. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:526–536.
  • Kessler D, Egan M, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Occupational performance coaching for stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial. Am J Occup Ther. 2017;71:7103190020p1–7103190020p7.
  • McKenna S, Jones F, Glenfield P, et al. Bridges self-management program for people with stroke in the community: a feasibility randomized controlled trial. Int J Stroke. 2015;10:697–704.
  • Egan M, Davis CG, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Participation and well-being poststroke: evidence of reciprocal effects [Internet]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:262–268.
  • Tse T, Douglas J, Lentin P, et al. Reduction in retained activity participation is associated with depressive symptoms 3 months after mild stroke: an observational cohort study. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49:120–127.
  • Satink T, Cup EHC, De Swart BJM, et al. How is self-management perceived by community living people after a stroke? A focus group study [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:223–230.
  • Polatajko HJ, McEwen SE, Ryan JD, et al. Pilot randomized controlled trial investigating cognitive strategy use to improve goal performance after stroke. Am J Occup Ther. 2012;66:104–109.
  • Kessler DE, Egan MY, Dubouloz CJ, et al. Occupational Performance Coaching for stroke survivors: a pilot randomized controlled trial protocol: Protocole pilote d’un essai clinique randomisé sur l’Occupational performance coaching for stroke survivors (OPC-Stroke). Can J Occup Ther. 2014;81:279–288.
  • Bordin ES. The generalizability of the psychoanalytic concept of the working alliance. Psychother Theory Res Pract. 1979;16:252–260.
  • McEwen SE, Polatajko HJ, Huijbregts MPJ, et al. Exploring a cognitive-based treatment approach to improve motor-based skill performance in chronic stroke: results of three single case experiments. Brain Inj. 2009;23:1041–1053.
  • McPherson K, Gibson BE, Leplège A. Rethinking rehabilitation: theory and practice. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; 2015.
  • Ilcan S. Privatizing responsibility: public sector reform under neoliberal government [Internet]. Can Rev Sociol. 2009;46:207–234.
  • Hammel J, Jones R, Gossett A, et al. Examining barriers and supports to community living and participation after a stroke from a participatory action research approach [Internet]. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2006;13:43–58.
  • McRuer R. Crip theory: cultural signs of queerness and disability. New York: NYU Press; 2006.
  • Egan MY, Laliberte Rudman D, Ceci C, et al. Seniors, risk and rehabilitation: broadening our thinking [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:1348–1355.
  • Skidmore E, Butters M, Whyte E, et al. Guided training relative to direct skill training for individuals with cognitive impairments after stroke: a pilot randomized trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:673–680.
  • Levack WMM, Dean SG, Siegert RJ, et al. Navigating patient-centered goal setting in inpatient stroke rehabilitation: how clinicians control the process to meet perceived professional responsibilities. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;85:206–213.
  • Egan MY, Kessler D, Ceci C, et al. Problematising risk in stroke rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38:2334–2344.
  • Wagner EH, Austin BT, Davis C, et al. Improving chronic illness care: translating evidence into action. Health Aff (Millwood). 2001;20:64–78.
  • Mawson S, Nasr N, Parker J, et al. Developing a personalised self-management system for post stroke rehabilitation; utilising a user-centred design methodology [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2014;9:521–528.
  • Sadler E, Wolfe CDA, McKevitt C. Lay and health care professional understandings of self-management: a systematic review and narrative synthesis. SAGE Open Med. 2014:2:1–18.
  • Young ME, Lutz BJ, Creasy KR, et al. A comprehensive assessment of family caregivers of stroke survivors during inpatient rehabilitation [Internet]. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36:1892–1902.
  • Brashler R, Brashler R. Ethics, family caregivers, and stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2017;9357:11–17.
  • Pawson R, Tilley N. Realist evaluation [Internet]. 2004 [cited 2017 Oct 12]. Available from: http://www.communitymatters.com.au/RE_chapter.pdf
  • Mackenzie C, Stoljar N. Introduction: autonomy refigured. In: Mackenzie C, Stoljar N, editors. Relational autonomy feminist perspectives on autonomy, agency, and the social self. New York: Oxford University Press; 2000. p. 3–34.
  • Tronto JC. Creating caring institutions: politics, plurality, and purpose. Ethics Soc Welf. 2010;4:158–171.
  • Kristensen HK, Tistad M, Von Koch L, et al. The importance of patient involvement in stroke rehabilitation. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0157149.
  • Baum CM. Fulfilling the promise: supporting participation in daily life [Internet]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:169–175.
  • Danzl MM, Etter NM, Andreatta RO, et al. Facilitating neurorehabilitation through principles of engagement. J Allied Health. 2012;41:35–41.
  • Vaz DV, Silva PL, Mancini MC, et al. Towards an ecologically grounded functional practice in rehabilitation. Hum Mov Sci. 2017;52:117–132.
  • Porter ME. What is value in health care? N Engl J Med. 2010;363:2477–2481.
  • Global stroke bill of rights as a person who has had a stroke. [cited 2017 Oct 5]; Available from: http://www.worldstrokecampaign.org/images/global_stroke_bill_of_rights/English_GlobalBORights_web.pdf
  • Small N. Knowledge, not evidence, should determine primary care practice. Clin Gov. 2003;8:191–199.
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation. Stroke rehabilitation definition and considerations [Internet]. 5th ed. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations; 2015 [cited 2017 Oct 5]. Available from: http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2010/10/Stroke-Rehabilitation-Definition-and-Considerations.pdf
  • Cameron JI, O’Connell C, Foley N, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: managing transitions of care following stroke, guidelines update 2016 [Internet]. Int J Stroke. 2016;11:807–822.
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada. Taking action for optimal community and long-term stroke care (TACLS): a resource for healthcare providers [Internet]. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations; 2016. Available from: http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/001-16-HSF_F15_TACLS_booklet_EN_Final_Linked.pdf
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation. Taking charge of your stroke recovery: a survivors guide to the canadian stroke best practice recommendations [Internet]. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations; 2014. Available from: http://www.strokebestpractices.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/08/HSF_SBP_PatientsGuide_F14_EN_July2014-FINAL.pdf
  • Heart and Stroke Foundation Canada. Your stroke journey: a guide for people living with stroke [Internet]. Canadian Stroke Best Practice Recommendations; 2015. Available from: http://www.heartandstroke.com/atf/cf/%7B99452d8b-e7f1-4bd6-a57d-b136ce6c95bf%7D/YOURSTROKEJOURNEY_FINAL_ENGLISH.PDF

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.