http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0711-3644
References
- World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
- Heinemann AW. Measurement of participation in rehabilitation research. Arch Phys Med Rehabil.2010;91:S1–S4.
- Wade DT, de Jong BA. Recent advances in rehabilitation. BMJ. 2000;320:1385–1388.
- Chang FH, Coster WJ, Helfrich CA. Community participation measures for people with disabilities: a systematic review of content from an international classification of functioning, disability and health perspective. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94:771–781.
- Chang FH, Coster WJ. Conceptualizing the construct of participation in adults with disabilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:1791–1798.
- Chang FH, Liou TH, Ni P, et al. Development of the Participation Measure–3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D): a new outcome measure for rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:286–294.
- Chang FH. Measuring participation of rehabilitation patients: test-retest reliability and mode of administration concordance of the Participation Measure–3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:1622–1627.
- Chang FH, Chang KH, Liou TH, et al. Validation of the Participation Measure-3 Domains, 4 Dimensions (PM-3D4D). Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98:2498–2506.
- Bird ML, Callisaya ML, Cannell J, et al. Accuracy, validity, and reliability of an electronic visual analog scale for pain on a touch screen tablet in healthy older adults: a clinical trial. Interact J Med Res. 2016;5:e3.
- Greenwood MC, Hakim AJ, Carson E, et al. Touch-screen computer systems in the rheumatology clinic offer a reliable and user-friendly means of collecting quality-of-life and outcome data from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2006;45:66–71.
- Feist H, Parker K, Howard N, et al. New technologies: their potential role in linking rural older people to community. International Journal of Emerging Technologies & Society. 2010;8(2):68–84.
- Hess R, Santucci A, McTigue K, et al. Patient difficulty using tablet computers to screen in primary care. J Gen Intern Med. 2008;23:476–480.
- Herrick DB, Nakhasi A, Nelson B, et al. Usability characteristics of self-administered computer-assisted interviewing in the emergency department: factors affecting ease of use, efficiency, and entry error. Appl Clin Inform. 2013;04:276–292.
- Nasreddine ZS, Phillips NA, Bédirian V, et al. The Montreal Cognitive Assessment, MoCA: a brief screening tool for mild cognitive impairment. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2005;53:695–699.
- Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of clinical Research: applications to practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2008.
- Portney LG, Watkins MP. Power and sample size (Appendix C). In: Mehalik C, editor. Foundations of clinical research: applications to practice. Vol. 3. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall; 2008. p 830–853.
- Bischoff-Ferrari HA, Vondechend M, Bellamy N, et al. Validation and patient acceptance of a computer touch screen version of the WOMAC 3.1 osteoarthritis index. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:80–84.
- Kleinman L, Leidy NK, Crawley J, et al. A comparative trial of paper-and-pencil versus computer administration of the Quality of Life in Reflux and Dyspepsia (QOLRAD) questionnaire. Med Care. 2001;39:181–189.
- Brahmandam S, Holland WC, Mangipudi SA, et al. Willingness and ability of older adults in the emergency department to provide clinical information using a tablet computer. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64:2362–2367.
- Stickel MS, Ryan S, Rigby PJ, et al. Toward a comprehensive evaluation of the impact of electronic aids to daily living: evaluation of consumer satisfaction. Disability and Rehabilitation. 2002;24:115–125.
- Mickan S, Tilson JK, Atherton H, et al. Evidence of effectiveness of health care professionals using handheld computers: a scoping review of systematic reviews. J Med Internet Res. 2013;15:e212.