Communication characteristics between clients and stakeholders within the Swedish sickness insurance system – a document analysis of granted and withdrawn sickness benefit claims

REFERENCES

• Lippel K. Preserving workers' dignity in workers' compensation systems: an international perspective. Am J Ind Med. 2012;55(6):519–536.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lippel K. Workers describe the effect of the workers' compensation process on their health: a Québec study. Int J Law Psychiatry. 2007;30:427–443.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorfman D. Re-claiming disability: identity, procedural justice, and the disability determination process. Law Soc Inquiry. 2017;42(1):195–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubertsson J, Petersson IF, Arvidsson B, et al. Sickness absence in musculoskeletal disorders - patients' experiences of interactions with the Social Insurance Agency and health care. A qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):107.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burstrom B, Nylen L, Clayton S, et al. How equitable is vocational rehabilitation in Sweden? A review of evidence on the implementation of a national policy framework. Disabil Rehabil. 2011;33(6):453–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance TSS, (ISF) I. När sjukpenning nekas (When sickness benefits are declined). In Swedish. Stockholm; 2013. Contract No.: 2013:1.
   Google Scholar
• Insurance TSS, (ISF) I. Ökning av antalet personer som får beslut om indragen sjukpenning. En redovisning av vad som kännetecknar gruppen försäkrade som får sin sjukpenning indragen. (Increase in the number of individuals with a decision of withdrawal of sickness benefits. A presentation of characteristics of the group of individuals with withdrawal). In Swedish. Stockholm; 2018. Contract No.: 2018:12.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Seing I, Gerdle B, et al. Fair or square? Experiences of introducing a new method for assessing general work ability in a sickness insurance context. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41(6):656–665.
   Google Scholar
• Kielhofner G. Model of human occupation: theory and application: Baltimore, MD: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, cop. 2008 4th edition; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Andersén Å, Ståhl C, Anderzén I, et al. Positive experiences of a vocational rehabilitation intervention for individuals on long-term sick leave, the Dirigo project: a qualitative study. BMC Public Health. 2017;17(1):790.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Meershoek A, Krumeich A, Vos R. Judging without criteria? Sickness certification in Dutch disability schemes. Sociology of Health & Illness. 200729(4):497.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, MacEachen E, Lippel K. Ethical perspectives in work disability prevention and return to work: toward a common vocabulary for analyzing stakeholders’ actions and interactions. J Business Ethics. 2014;120(2):237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacEachen E. The science and politics of work disability prevention: Routledge; New York: 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. London: SAGE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Hodder I. The interpretation of documents and material culture. Denzin NK, Lincoln YS, editors. Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Bowen GA. Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qual Res J. 2009;9(2):27–40.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Svensson T, Peterson G, et al. The work ability divide: holistic and reductionistic approaches in Swedish interdisciplinary rehabilitation teams. J Occup Rehabil. 2009(3):264.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Insurance TSS, (ISF) I. Mötet mellan medborgaren och staten (The encounters between the citizen and the state). In Swedish. Stockholm; 2017. Contract No.: 2017:13.
   Google Scholar
• Ståhl C, Andersson F. Shifting to value-based principles in sickness insurance: challenges in changing roles and culture. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28:730–739.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipsky M. Street level Bureacracy. New York: Sage publication; 1980.
   Google Scholar
• Ekberg K. Den relativa arbetsförmågan: teoretiska och praktiska perspektiv. (The relative work ability: theoretical and practical perspectives). Lund: Studentlitteratur, 2014; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Cronin S, Curran J, Iantorno J, et al. Work capacity assessment and return to work: a scoping review. Work (Reading, Mass). 2013;44(1):37–55.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mannelqvist R, Karlsson B, Järvholm B. Arbete och arbetsmarknad i sjukförsäkringen (Work and labor market in the sickness insurance). In Swedish. 2016. Contract No.: 2016:6.
   Google Scholar
• Mårtensson L, Hensing G. Experiences of factors contributing to women's ability to make informed decisions about the process of rehabilitation and return to work: a focus group study. Work. 2012(2):237.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kilgour E, Kosny A, McKenzie D, et al. Interactions between injured workers and insurers in workers’ compensation systems: A systematic review of qualitative research literature. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. 2015;25(1):160–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Culler K, Wang YC, Byers K, et al. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: Perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Topics in Stroke Rehabilitation. 2011;18(4):325–340.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nyberg D. 'You need to be healthy to be ill': constructing sickness and framing the body in Swedish healthcare. Organ Stud. 2012;33(12):1671–1692.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar