Examining the relevance of employment integration policies on disability benefit receipt: a multilevel analysis of older working age adults in 16 countries

References

• Liebman J. Understanding the increase in disability insurance benefit receipt in the United States. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29:123–150.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• OECD. Sickness, disability and work. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Marin B. Welfare in an idle society? Reinventing retirement, work, wealth, health, and welfare. Vienna: European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Böheim R, Leoni T. Sickness and disability policies: reform paths in OECD countries between 1990 and 2014. Int J Soc Welf. 2018;27:168–185.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burkhauser R, Daly M, McVicar D, et al. Disability benefit growth and disability reform in the US: lessons from other OECD nations. J Labor Policy. 2014;1:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Blondal S, Scarpetta S. Early retirement in OECD countries: the role of social security systems. Paris, France: OECD Publishing; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Ebbinghaus B. Reforming early retirement in Europe, Japan and the USA. UK: Oxford University Press; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Engelhardt H. Late careers in Europe: effects of individual and institutional factors. Eur Sociol Rev. 2012;28:550–563.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber J, Wise D, editors. Social security programs and retirement around the world: fiscal implications of reform. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Börsch-Supan A. Work disability: the effects of demography, health, and disability insurance. In: Wise D, editor. Research findings in the economics of aging. Chicago (IL): The University of Chicago Press; 2010. p. 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Börsch-Supan A, Bucher-Koenen T, Hanemann F. Early determinants of work disability in an international perspective. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Esping-Andersen G. The three worlds of welfare capitalism. Princeton (NJ): Princeton University Press; 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Stone D. The disabled state. Philadelphia (PA): Temple University Press; 1986.
   Google Scholar
• Brandt D, Houtenville A, Huynh M, et al. Connecting contemporary paradigms to the social security administration’s disability evaluation process. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2011;22:116–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. ICF – International classification of functioning, disability, and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rank M, Hirschl T. The risk of developing a work disability across the adulthood years. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:189–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiecolt-Glaser J, Newton T. Marriage and health: his and hers. Psychol Bull. 2001;127:472–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson C, Oswald A. How does marriage affect physical and psychological health? A survey of the longitudinal evidence. UK: Warwick University; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Couch K, Tamborini C, Reznik G. The long-term health implications of marital disruption: divorce, work limits, and social security disability benefits among men. Demography. 2015;52:1487–1512.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benitez-Silva H, Disney R, Jiménez-Martín S. Disability, capacity for work and the business cycle: an international perspective. Econ Policy. 2010;25:483–536.
   Google Scholar
• McVicar D. Why do disability benefit rolls vary between regions? A review of the evidence from the USA and the UK. Reg Stud. 2006;40:519–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan K, Wise D. Social security and retirement around the world: historical trends in mortality and health, employment, and disability insurance participation and reforms-introduction and summary. Cambridge (MA): National Bureau of Economic Research; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Autor D, Duggan M. The rise in the disability rolls and the decline in unemployment. Q J Econ. 2003;118:157–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bickenbach J, Posarac A, Alarcos C, et al. Assessing disability in working age population. Washington (DC): World Bank; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Adam S, Bozio A, Emmerson C. Reforming disability insurance in the UK: evaluation of the pathways to work programme. London (UK): Institute for Fiscal Studies; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Kostol A, Mogstad M. How financial incentives induce disability insurance recipients to return to work. Am Econ Rev. 2014;104:624–655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weathers RR, Hemmeter J. The impact of changing financial work incentives on the earnings of Social Security Disability Insurance (SSDI) beneficiaries. J Pol Anal Manage. 2011;30:708–728.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Jong P. Recent changes in Dutch disability policy. Netherlands: APE; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• van Sonsbeek J, Gradus R. Estimating the effects of recent disability reforms in the Netherlands. Discussion paper no. 11-121/3. Amsterdam, Netherlands: Tinbergen Institute; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Stapleton D, Mamun A, Page J. Initial impacts of the Ticket to Work program: estimates based on exogenous variation in Ticket mail months. J Labor Policy. 2014;3:6.
   Google Scholar
• Bütler M, Deuchert E, Lechner M, et al. Financial work incentives for disability benefit recipients: lessons from a randomised field experiment. IZA J Labor Policy. 2015;1:18.
   Google Scholar
• Malter F, Börsch-Supan A. SHARE compliance profiles – wave 4. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Malter F, Börsch-Supan A. SHARE compliance profiles – wave 5. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Bergmann M, Kneip T, De Luca G, et al. Survey participation in the Survey of Health, Ageing and Retirement in Europe (SHARE), wave. Munich: MEA, Max Planck Institute for Social Law and Social Policy; 2014. p. 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Banks J, Nazroo J, Steptoe A. The dynamics of ageing: evidence from the English Longitudinal Study of Ageing 2002–12 (wave 6); 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Health and Retirement Study. Sample size and response rates. Michigan (MI): HRS Survey Research Center; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. Pensions at a glance 2015. Paris: OECD Social Indicators; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Poterba J, Venti S, Wise D. Health, education, and the postretirement evolution of household assets. J Hum Capital. 2013;7:297–339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kapteyn A, Meijer E. A comparison of different measures of health and their relation to labor force transitions at older ages. In: Wise D, editor. Discoveries in the economics of aging. Chicago (IL): University of Chicago Press; 2013. p. 115–150.
   Google Scholar
• Enzmann D, Kohler U. Rescaling results of nonlinear probability models to compare regression coefficients or variance components across hierarchically nested models. German Stata Users Group Meeting. Berlin: University of Hamburg; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Angel S, Heitzmann K. Over-indebtedness in Europe: the relevance of country-level variables for the over-indebtedness of private households. J Eur Soc Policy. 2015;25:331–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bryan M, Jenkins S. Multilevel modelling of country effects: a cautionary tale. Eur Sociol Rev. 2016;32:3–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis J, Linzer D. Estimating regression models in which the dependent variable is based on estimates. Polit Anal. 2005;13:345–364.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office of Inspector General. The cost-effectiveness of vocational rehabilitation services. Washington D.C.: US Government; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Banks J, Blundell R, Emmerson C. Disability benefit receipt and reform: reconciling trends in the United Kingdom. J Econ Perspect. 2015;29:173–190.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover C, Piggott L. From incapacity benefit to employment and support allowance: social sorting, sickness and impairment, and social security. Policy Study J. 2010;3:265–282.
   Google Scholar