Development of a participatory, tailored behaviour change intervention to increase active practice during inpatient stroke rehabilitation

References

• Carr JH, Shepherd RB. Stroke rehabilitation: guidelines for exercise and training to optimize motor skill. London: Butterworth-Heinemann; 2003.
   Google Scholar
• Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45:2053–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016;62:182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Intercollegiate Stroke Working Party. National clinical guidline for stroke. 5th ed. London: Royal College of Phsysicians; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Hebert D, Lindsay MP, McIntyre A, et al. Canadian stroke best practice recommendations: stroke rehabilitation practice guidelines, update 2015. Int J Stroke. 2016;11:459–484.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management 2017. Melbourne, VIC, Australia: National Stroke Foundation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90:1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaur G, English C, Hillier S. How physically active are people with stroke in physiotherapy sessions aimed at improving motor function? A systematic review. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:820673.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stewart C, McCluskey A, Ada L, et al. Structure and feasibility of extra practice during stroke rehabilitation: a systematic scoping review. Aust Occup Ther J. 2017;64:204–217.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross LF, Harvey LA, Lannin NA. Strategies for increasing the intensity of upper limb task-specific practice after acquired brain impairment: a secondary analysis from a randomised controlled trial. Br J Occup Ther. 2016;79:353–360.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• English C, Hillier S. Circuit class therapy for improving mobility after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;7:CD007513.
   Google Scholar
• Galvin R, Cusack T, O'Grady E, et al. Family-mediated exercise intervention (FAME): evaluation of a novel form of exercise delivery after. Stroke. 2011;42:681–686.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function, and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;6:CD006876.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• West T, Bernhardt J. Physical activity in hospitalised stroke patients. Stroke Res Treat. 2012;2012:1.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles MP, Armstrong D, Baker R, et al. An implementation research agenda. Implement Sci. 2009;4:18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:979–983.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nilsen P. Making sense of implementation theories, models and frameworks. Implement Sci. 2015;10:53.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, van Stralen MM, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a new method for characterising and designing behaviour change interventions. Implement Sci. 2011;6:42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cane J, O'Connor D, Michie S. Validation of the theoretical domains framework for use in behaviour change and implementation research.Implement Sci. 2012;7:37.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Atkins L, Michie S. Changing eating behaviour: what can we learn from behavioural science? Nutr Bull. 2013;38:30–35.
   Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Redfern J, et al. Development of a behaviour change intervention to increase upper limb exercise in stroke rehabilitation. Implement Sci. 2015;10:34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pinnock H, Barwick M, Carpenter CR, et al. Standards for Reporting Implementation Studies (StaRI) statement. BMJ. 2017;356:i6795.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker R, Camosso-Stefinovic J, Gillies C, et al. Tailored interventions to address determinants of practice. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;4:CD005470.
   Google Scholar
• Fini NA, Holland AE, Keating J, et al. How is physical activity monitored in people following stroke? Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37:1717–1731.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King A, McCluskey A, Schurr K. The time use and activity levels of inpatients in a co-located acute and rehabilitation stroke unit: an observational study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18:654–665.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackey F, Ada L, Heard R, et al. Stroke rehabilitation: are highly structured units more conductive to physical activity than less structured units? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1996;27:1066–1070.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour RS. Making sense of focus groups. Med Educ. 2005;39:742–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pope C, Ziebland S, Mays N. Analysing qualitative research. BMJ. 2000;320:114–116.
   Google Scholar
• Michie S, Richardson M, Johnston M, et al. The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions. Ann Behav Med. 2013;46:81–95.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michie S, Atkins L, West R. The behaviour change wheel: a guide to designing interventions. Great Britain: Silverback Publishing; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Scott SC, Albrecht L, O'Leary K, et al. Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies in the allied health professions. Implement Sci. 2012;7:70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colquhoun H, Lamontagne A, Duncan E, et al. A systematic review of inteventions to increase the use of standardized outcome measures by rehabilitation professionals. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31:299–309.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pryor J. A nursing perspective on the relationship between nursing and allied health in inpatient rehabilitation. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30:314–322.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke DJ. Nursing practice in stroke rehabilitation: systematic review and meta-ethnography. J Clin Nurs. 2014;23:1201–1226.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seneviratne CC, Mather CM, Then KL. Understanding nursing on an acute stroke unit: perceptions of space, time and interprofessional practice. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65:1872–1881.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barreca S, Wilkins S. Experiences of nurses working in a stroke rehabilitation unit. J Adv Nurs. 2008;63:36–44.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huijg JM, Gebhardt WA, Dusseldorp E, et al. Measuring determinants of implementation behavior: psychometric properties of a questionnaire based on the theoretical domains framework. Implement Sci. 2014;9:33.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P, Wolfe C, et al. The concept of patient motivation: a qualitative analysis of stroke professionals' attitudes. Stroke. 2002;33:444–448.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:1698–1708 e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maclean N, Pound P. A critical review of the concept of patient motivation in the literature on physical rehabilitation. Soc Sci Med. 2000;50:495–506.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar