855
Views
19
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Physical Activity, Self-efficacy and Health-related Quality of Life among Adults with Visual Impairments

ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 530-536 | Received 27 Nov 2018, Accepted 10 Jun 2019, Published online: 23 Jun 2019

References

  • Bowling A, Windsor J. Towards the good life: a population survey of dimensions of quality of life. J Happiness Stud. 2001;2:55–81.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Measuring health days: Population assessment of health-related quality of life. Centers for Diseaese Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, 2000.
  • Diener E, Suh EM, Lucas RE. Subjective well-being: three decades of progress. Psychol Bull. 1999;125:276–302.
  • Bize R, Johnson JA, Plotnikoff RC. Physical activity level and health-related quality of life in the general adult population: a systematic review. Prev Med. 2007;45:401–415.
  • Chadha R, Subramanian A. The effect of visual impairment on quality of life of children aged 3-16 years. Br J Ophthalmol. 2011;95:642–645.
  • Chia E, Wang J, Rochtchina E, et al. Impact of bilateral visual impairment on health-related quality of life: the Blue Mountains Eye Study. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2004;45:71–76.
  • Langelaan M, de Boer M, van Nispen R, et al. Impact of visual impairment on quality of life: a comparison with quality of life in the general population and with other chronic conditions. Ophthalmic Epidemiol. 2007;14:119–126.
  • Varma R, Wu J, Chong K, et al. Impact of severity and bilaterality of visual impairment on health-related quality of life. Ophthalmology. 2006;113:1846–1853.
  • Park Y, Shin JA, Yang SW, et al. The relationship between visual impairment and health-related quality of life in Korean adults: the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (2008–2012). Plos One. 2015;10:1–14.
  • Cardinal BJ, Kang M, Farnsworth JL, et al. Historical context and current status of the intersection of physical activity and public health: results of the 2015 American Kinesiology Association’s Opportunities for Kinesiology survey. Kinesiol Rev. 2015;4:329–345.
  • Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Mishra G. Psychological distress, television viewing, and physical activity in children aged 4 to 12 years. Pediatrics. 2009;123:1263–1268.
  • Spengler S, Woll A. The more physically active, the healthier? The relationship between physical activity and health-related quality of life in adolescents: the MoMo study. J Phys Act Health. 2013;10:708–715.
  • Berger BG, Tobar DA. Physical activity and quality of life. In: Tenenbaum G, Eklund R, editors, Handbook of sport psychology (3rd ed.). New York (NY): John Wiley & Sons; 2007. p. 598–620.
  • Brown DR, Carroll DD, Workman LM, et al. Physical activity and health-related quality of life: US adults with and without limitations. Qual Life Res. 2014;23:2673–2680.
  • Haegele JA, Famelia R, Lee J. Health-related quality of life, physical activity, and sedentary behavior of adults with visual impairments. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39:2269–2276.
  • Holbrook EA, Caputo JL, Perry TL, et al. Physical activity, body composition, and perceived quality of life of adults with visual impairment. J Vis Impair Blind. 2009;103:17–29.
  • Bandura A. Self-efficacy. In: Ramachaudran VS, editor. Encyclopedia of human behavior. New York (NY): Academic Press; 1994.
  • Bandura A. Social cognitive theory: an agentic perspective. Annu Rev Psychol. 2001;52:1–26.
  • Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, et al. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? Lancet. 2012;280:259–271.
  • Barz M, Lange D, Parschau L, et al. Self-efficacy, planning, and preparatory behaviours as joint predictors of physical activity: a conditional process analysis. Psychol Health. 2016;31:65–78.
  • McAuley E, Blissmer B. Self-efficacy determinants and consequences of physical activity. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2000;28:85–88.
  • Haegele JA, Kirk TN, Zhu X. Self-efficacy and physical activity among adults with visual impairments. Disabil Health J. 2018;11:324–329.
  • Craig CL, Marshall AL, Sjostrom M, et al. International physical activity questionnaire: 12-country reliability and validity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35:1381–1395.
  • Haegele JA, Zhu X, Lee J, et al. Physical activity for adults with visual impairments: impact of socio-demographic factors. Eujapa. 2016;9:3–14.
  • Marmeleira J, Laranjo L, Marques O, et al. Criterion-related validity of the short form of the international physical activity questionnaire in adults who are blind. J Vis Impair Blind. 2013;107:375–382.
  • Sadowska D, Krzepota J. Assessment of physical activity of people with visual impairments and individuals who are sighted using the international physical activity questionnaire. J Vis Impair Blind. 2015;109:119–129.
  • Sallis JF, Pinski RB, Grossman RM, et al. The development of self-efficacy scales for health-related diet and exercise behaviors. Health Educ Res. 1988;3:283–292.
  • Wilcox S, Bopp M, Oberrecht L, et al. Psychosocial and perceived environmental correlates of physical activity in rural and older African American and white women. J Gerontol. 2003;58:329–337.
  • Ware J, Jr, Kosinski M, Keller SD. A 12-item short-form health survey: construction of scales and preliminary tests of reliability and validity. Med Care. 1996;34:220–233.
  • Ware J, Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). Conceptual framework and item selection. Med Care. 1992;30:473–483.
  • Wyrwich K, Tierney W, Babu A, et al. A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease. Health Serv Res. 2005;40:577–591.
  • United States Association of Blind Athletes. Visual classifications; 2014. Available from: https://www.usaba.org/membership/visual-classifications/
  • Hu L-T, Bentler PM. Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Struct Equ Modeling. 1999;6:1–55.
  • Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. 2002;9:233–255.
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [Internet]. Physical activity guidelines; 2015. Available from: https://www.cdc.gov/physicalactivity/index.html
  • Labudski J, Tasiemski T. Physical activity and life satisfaction in blind and visually impaired individuals. Human Movement. 2013;14:210–216.
  • Harrison T. Health promotion for persons with disabilities: what does the literature reveal? Fam Community Health. 2006;29:125–192.
  • Crews JE, Campbell VA. Health conditions, activity limitations, and participation restrictions among older people with visual impairments. J Vis Impair Blind. 2001;95:453–467.
  • McAuley E, Konopack JF, Motl RW, et al. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults: influence of health status and self-efficacy. Ann Behav Med. 2006;31:99–103.
  • Rejeski WJ, Mihalko SL. Physical activity and quality of life in older adults. J Gerontol. 2001;56:23–35.
  • Lee M, Zhu W, Ackley-Holbrook E, et al. Calibration and validation of the physical activity barrier scale for persons who are blind or visually impaired. Disabil Health J. 2014;7:309–317.
  • Marmeleira J, Laranjo L, Marques O, et al. Physical activity patterns in adults who are blind as assessed by accelerometry. Adapt Phys Act Q. 2014;31:283–296.
  • Starkoff BE, Lenz EK, Lieberman LJ, et al. Sedentary behavior in adults with visual impairments. Disabil Health J. 2016;9:609–615.
  • Ashford S, Edmunds J, French DP. What is the best way to change self-efficacy to promote lifestyle and recreational physical activity? A systematic review with meta-analysis. Br J Health Psychol. 2010;15:265–288.
  • Tucker JM, Welk GJ, Beyler NK. Physical activity in US adults: compliance with the physical activity guidelines for Americans. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40:454–461.
  • Adams SA, Matthews CE, Ebbeling CB, et al. The effect of social desirability and social approval on self-reports of physical activity. Am J Epidemiol. 2005;161:389–398.
  • Wright KB. Researching internet-based populations: advantages and disadvantages of online survey research, online questionnaire authoring software packages, and web survey services. J Comput-Mediated Commun. 2005;10:JCMC1034.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.