Romantic relationship and psychological wellbeing: the experiences of young individuals with visual impairment

References

• Mackinnon SP, Nosko A, Pratt MW, Norriset JE. Intimacy in young adults' narratives of romance and friendship predicts Eriksonian generativity: A mixed method analysis. J Pers. 2011;79(3):587–617.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diamond LM. Emerging perspectives on disctinctions between romantic love and sexual desire. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2004;13(3):116–119.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ambwani S, Strauss J. Love thyself before loving others? A qualitative and quantitative analysis of gender differences in body image and romantic love. Sex Roles. 2007;56(1–2):13–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braithwaite SR, Delevi R, Fincham FD. Romantic relationships and the physical and mental health of college students. Pers Relationship. 2010;17(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brase GL, Guy EC. The demographics of mate value and self-esteem. Pers Indiv Differ. 2004;36(2):471–484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dush CMK, Amato PR. Consequences of relationship status and quality for subjective well-being. J Soc Pers Relat. 2005;22(5):607–627.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arnett JJ. Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. Am Psychol. 2000;55(5):469–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman W, Shomaker LB. Patterns of interaction in adolescent romantic relationships: distinct features and links to other close relationships. J Adolescence. 2008;31(6):771–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furman W, Winkles JK. Predicting romantic involvement, relationship cognitions, and relationship qualities from physical appearance, perceived norms, and relational styles regarding friends and parents. 2010. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.07.004
   Google Scholar
• Grammas DL, Schwartz JP. Internalization of messages from society and perfectionism as predictors of male body image. Body Image. 2009;6(1):31–36.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grover VP, Keel PK, Mitchell JP. Gender differences in implicit weight identity. Int J Eat Disord. 2003;34(1):125–135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eunjung K. Asexuality in disability narratives. Sexualities. 2011;14(4):479–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hassouneh-Phillips D, McNeff E. I thought I was less worthy”: Low sexual and body esteem and increased vulnerability to intimate partner abuse in women with physical disabilities. Sex Disabil. 2005;23(4):227–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tepper MS. Sexuality and disability: the missing discourse of pleasure. Sex Disabil. 2000;18(4):283–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gill C. Dating and relationship issues In Krotoski D, Nosek M, & Turk M, editors. Women with physical disabilities. Baltimore (MD): Paul H. Brookes Publishing; 1996. p. 117–123.
   Google Scholar
• Fichten CS, Goodrick G, Amsel R, et al. Reactions toward dating peers with visual impairments. Rehabil Psychol. 1991;36(3):163–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esmail S, Darry K, Walter A, et al. Attitudes and perceptions towards disability and sexuality. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(14):1148–1155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dotson LA, Stinson J, Christian L. People Tell Me I Can’t Have Sex”: women with disabilities share their personal perspectives on health care, sexuality, and reproductive rights. Women Ther. 2003;264(3):195–209.
   Google Scholar
• Giulio GD. Sexuality and people living with physical or developmental disabilities: A review of key issues. Can J Human Sex. 2003;12(1):53–68.
   Google Scholar
• Taleporos G, McCabe MP. Relationships, sexuality and adjustment among people with physical disability. Sex Relatsh Ther. 2003;18(1):25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Savage A, McConnell D. The marital status of disabled women in Canada: a population-based analysis. Scand J Disabil Res. 2016;18(4):295–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford DBA, Ostrove JM. Representations of disability and the interpersonal relationships of women with disabilities. Women Ther. 2003;26(3–4):179–194.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer HL, Snyder JA, Fisher BS. Intimate partner victimization among college students with and without disabilities: prevalence of and relationship to emotional well-being. J Interpers Violence. 2016;31(1):49–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barranti CCR, Yuen FQO. Intimate partner violence and women with disabilities: toward bringing visibility to an unrecognized population. J Soc Work Disabil Rehab. 2008;7(2):115–130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pinquart M, Pfeiffer JP. What is essential is invisible to the eye: Intimate relationships of adolescents with visual impairment. Sex Disabil. 2012;30(2):139–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kef S, Hox JJ, Habekothé HT. Social networks of visually impaired and blind adolescents. Structure and effect on well-being. Soc Networks. 2000;22(1):73–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Finkel EJ, Eastwick PW, Matthews J. Speed dating as an invaluable tool for studying romantic attraction: a methological primer. Pers Relationship. 2007;14(1):149–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fugère MA, Chabot C, Doucette K, et al. The importance of physical attractiveness to the mate choices of women and their mothers. Evol Psychol Sci. 2017;3(3):243.
   Google Scholar
• Kef S, Bos H. Is love blind? Sexual behavior and psychological adjustment of adolescents with blindness. Sex Disabil. 2006;24(2):89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erikson E. Identity and the life cycle. New York (NY): International Universities Press; 1959.
   Google Scholar
• Harter S. On the importance of importance ratings in understanding adolescents’ self-esteem: Beyond statistical par- simony In: Riding RJ, Rayner SG, editors. Self perception: International perspectives on individual differences. Vol. 2, Westport, CT: Ablex; 2001. p. 3–23.
   Google Scholar
• Harter S. The development of self-representations during childhood and adolescence In: Leary MR, Tagney JP, editors. Handbook of self and identity. New York, NY: Guilford Press; 2003. p. 610–642.
   Google Scholar
• Bezerra CP, Freitag Pagliuca LM. The experience of sexuality by visually impaired adolescents. Revista Da Escola De Enfermagem Da Usp. 2010;44(3):578–583.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bambara JK, Wadley V, Owsley C, et al. Family functioning and low vision: a systematic review. J Visual Impair Blin. 2009;103(3):137–149.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanders KY. Overprotection and lowered expectations of persons with disabilities: the unforeseen consequences. Work. 2006;27(2):181–188.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health – ICF. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Saetermoe CL, Scattone D, Kim KH. Ethnicity and the stigma of disabilities. Psychol Health. 2001;16(6):699–713.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scior K, Addai-Davis J, Kenyon M, et al. Stigma, public awareness about intellectual disability and attitudes to inclusion among different ethnic groups. J Intell Disabil Res. 2013;57(11):1014–1026.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang K, Johnston M, Smith JK. Romantic attachment in individuals with physical disabilities. Rehabil Psychol. 2007;52(2):184–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCabe MP, Cummins RA, Deeks AA. Sexuality and quality of life among people with physical disability. Sex Disabil. 2000;18(2):115–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Israeli Ministry of Labor, Social Affairs and Social Services. The family status of blind and visually impaired people compared to the general population. Jerusalem, Israel; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Israel Central Bureau of Statistics. Society & population. Jerusalem (Israel): Central Bureau of Statistics; 2018. Available from: https://www.cbs.gov.il/he/publications/DocLib/2018/shnaton69/shnaton69.pdf [Hebrew]
   Google Scholar
• Sandler-Loeff, A., Shahak, Y. editors. The Program for Advancing the Status of People with Disabilities in Arab Society in Israel JDC Israel, the Unit for Disabilities and Rehabilitation Masira (Journey). Jerusalem (Israel): Joint Distribution Committee - ISRAEL (JDC-Israel); 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Zlotogora J, Habiballa H, Odatalla A, et al. Changing family structure in a modernizing society: a study of marriage patterns in a single Muslim village in Israel. Am J Hum Biol. 2002;14(5):680–682.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kandel I, Morad M, Vardi G, et al. The arab community in israel coping with intellectual and developmental disability. Sci World J. 2004;4:324–332.
   Google Scholar
• Florian V. Cross-cultural differences in attitudes towards disabled persons: A study of Jewish and Arab youth in Israel. Int J Intercult Rel. 1982;6(3):291–299.
   Google Scholar
• Lavee Y, Katz R. The Family in Israel. Marriage Fam Rev. 2003;35:193–217.
   Google Scholar
• Na'amnih W, Romano-Zelekha O, Kabaha A, et al. Continuous decrease of consanguineous marriages among Arabs in Israel. Am J Hum Biol. 2015;27(1):94–98.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Charmaz K, McMullen LM. 2011. Five ways of doing qualitative analysis: Phenomenological psychology, grounded theory, discourse analysis, narrative research, and intuitive inquiry. New York (NY): Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sokolowski R. 2000. Introduction to phenomenology. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Arnett JJ. 2014. Emerging adulthood: the winding road from the late teens through the twenties. (2nd ed.). New York (NY): Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Erikson EH. 1968. Identity: youth and crisis. New York (NY): Norton.
   Google Scholar
• Guest G, MacQueen KM, Namey EE. 2012; Applied thematic analysis. Newcastle upon Tyne (UK): Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Taleporos G, McCAbe M. The impact of Self-Esteem, body esteem, and sexual satisfaction on psychological Well-Being in people with physical disability. Sex Disabil. 2002;20(3):177–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Foltz R. 2006. Animals in islamic tradition and muslim cultures. Oxford (UK): One World.
   Google Scholar
• Yuval-Davis N. Sexuality in muslim contexts: restrictions and resistance. Fem Rev. 2014;108(1):e7–e9.
   Google Scholar
• Valerie, M., Patterson, ML. editors. The SAGE handbook of nonverbal communication nonverbal behavior in intimate interactions and intimate relationships. California, USA: Sage Publications; 2006. Available from: https://doi.org/10.4135/9781412976152
   Google Scholar
• Yan LH, Kleinman A, Link BG, et al. Culture and stigma: adding moral experience to stigma theory. Soc Sci Med. 2006;64(7):1524–1535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strier R, Zidan I. Arranged marriages: An oppressed emancipation? Women Stud Int Forum. 2013;40:203–211.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne A, Carr D. Caught in the cultural lag: the stigma of singlehood. Psychol Inq. 2005;16(2/3):84–91.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day MV, Kay AC, Holmes JG, et al. System justification and the defense of committed relationship ideology. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2011;101(2):291–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spielmann SS, MacDonald G, Maxwell JA, et al. Settling for less out of fear of being single. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2013;105(6):1049–1073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Diener E, Lucas RE, Oishi S. Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In: CR. Snyder & SJ. Lopez, editors. Handbook of positive psychology. New York (NY): Oxford University Press; 2002. p. 63–73.
   Google Scholar
• Desmarais V, Savoie A. What is psychological well-being, really? A grassroots approach from the organizational sciences. J Happiness Stud. 2011;16(7):12–22.
   Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. 1985. Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar