428
Views
4
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

The reliability and validity of a digital version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool

ORCID Icon, , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1738-1741 | Received 05 Jul 2019, Accepted 19 Sep 2019, Published online: 30 Sep 2019

References

  • Roos KG, Marshall SW, Kerr ZY, et al. Epidemiology of overuse injuries in collegiate and high school athletics in the United States. Am J Sports Med. 2015;43(7):1790–1797.
  • Shah S, Thomas AC, Noone JM, et al. Incidence and cost of ankle sprains in United States Emergency Departments. Sports Health. 2016;8(6):547–552.
  • Gribble PA, Delahunt E, Bleakley C, et al. Selection criteria for patients with chronic ankle instability in controlled research: a position statement of the International Ankle Consortium. Br J Sports Med. 2014;48(13):1014–1018.
  • Hiller CE, Refshauge KM, Bundy AC, et al. The Cumberland ankle instability tool: a report of validity and reliability testing. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87(9):1235–1241.
  • Houston MN, Van Lunen BL, Hoch MC. Health-related quality of life in individuals with chronic ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2014;49(6):758–763.
  • Rosen A, Ko J, Brown C. A multivariate assessment of clinical contributions to the severity of perceived dysfunction measured by the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Int J Sports Med. 2016;37(14):1154–1158.
  • Rosen AB, Ko J, Brown CN. Diagnostic accuracy of instrumented and manual talar tilt tests in chronic ankle instability populations. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25(2):e214–e221.
  • Rosen A, Swanik C, Thomas S, et al. Differences in lateral drop jumps from an unknown height among individuals with functional ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2013;48(6):773–781.
  • Wright CJ, Arnold BL, Ross SE, et al. Recalibration and validation of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool cutoff score for individuals with chronic ankle instability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(10):1853–1859.
  • Cruz-Diaz D, Hita-Contreras F, Lomas-Vega R, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Spanish version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT): an instrument to assess unilateral chronic ankle instability. Clin Rheumatol. 2013;32(1):91–98.
  • De Noronha M, Refshauge KM, Kilbreath SL, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian-Portuguese version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool (CAIT). Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(26):1959–1965.
  • Ko J, Rosen AB, Brown CN. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Koran version of the Cumberland Ankle Instability Tool. Int J Sports Phys Ther. 2015;10(7):1007–1014.
  • Dillman DA, Phelps G, Tortora R, et al. Response rate and measurement differences in mixed-mode surveys using mail, telephone, interactive voice response (IVR) and the Internet. Soc Sci Res. 2009;38(1):1–18.
  • Bjorner JB, Rose M, Gandek B, et al. Method of administration of PROMIS scales did not significantly impact score level, reliability, or validity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2014;67(1):108–113.
  • Epis OM, Casu C, Belloli L, et al. Pixel or paper? Validation of a mobile technology for collecting patient-reported outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis. JMIR Res Protoc. 2016;5(4):e219.
  • Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S. Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health. 2008;11(2):322–333.
  • Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the Kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–363.
  • Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163.
  • Gribble PA. Evaluating and differentiating ankle instability. J Athl Train. 2019;54(6):617. [Epub ahead of print]
  • Rose KJ, Hiller CE, Mandarakas M, et al. Correlates of functional ankle instability in children and adolescents with Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease. J Foot Ankle Res. 2015;8(1):61.
  • Baldwin JN, McKay MJ, Hiller CE, et al. Correlates of perceived ankle instability in healthy individuals aged 8 to 101 years. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(1):72–79.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.