1,690
Views
2
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Assessing significant others’ cognitions and behavioral responses in occupational health care for workers with a chronic disease

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Pages 2690-2703 | Received 30 Jul 2019, Accepted 01 Jan 2020, Published online: 19 Jan 2020

References

  • Berg CA, Upchurch R. A developmental-contextual model of couples coping with chronic illness across the adult life span. Psychol Bull. 2007;133(6):920–954.
  • Cano A, Leong L. Significant others in the chronicity of pain and disability. In: Hasenbring M, Rusu A, Turk D, editors. From acute to chronic back pain: risk factors, mechanisms, and clinical implications. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press; 2012. p. 339–354.
  • White C, Green RA, Ferguson S, et al. The influence of social support and social integration factors on return to work outcomes for individuals with work-related injuries: a systematic review. J Occup Rehabil. 2019;29:636–659.
  • Snippen NC, de Vries H, van der Burg-Vermeulen S, et al. Influence of significant others on work participation of individuals with chronic diseases: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2019;9(1):e021742.
  • Helgeson VS, Zajdel M. Adjusting to chronic health conditions. Annu Rev Psychol. 2017;68:545571.
  • Gallant MP. The influence of social support on chronic illness self-management: a review and directions for research. Health Educ Behav. 2003;30:170–195.
  • Frederiksen P, Karsten MMV, Indahl A, et al. What challenges manual workers’ ability to cope with back pain at work, and what influences their decision to call in sick? J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):707–716.
  • Dorland HF, Abma FI, Roelen CAM, et al. Factors influencing work functioning after cancer diagnosis: a focus group study with cancer survivors and occupational health professionals. Support Care Cancer. 2016;24(1):261–266.
  • Bodenmann G, Randall AK, Falconier MK. Coping in couples: the Systemic Transactional Model (STM). In: Couples coping with stress: a cross-cultural perspective. New York: Routledge; 2016. p. 31–48.
  • Brooks J, McCluskey S, King N, et al. Illness perceptions in the context of differing work participation outcomes: exploring the influence of significant others in persistent back pain. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14(1):48.
  • McCluskey S, de Vries H, Reneman M, et al. I think positivity breeds positivity’: a qualitative exploration of the role of family members in supporting those with chronic musculoskeletal pain to stay at work. BMC Fam Pract. 2015;16(1):85.
  • Gagnon A, Lin J, Stergiou-Kita M. Family members facilitating community re-integration and return to productivity following traumatic brain injury – motivations, roles and challenges. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(5):433–441.
  • Tamminga SJ, de Boer A, Verbeek J, et al. Breast cancer survivors’ views of factors that influence the return-to-work process–a qualitative study. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2012;38(2):144–154.
  • Kong W, Tang D, Luo X, et al. Prediction of return to work outcomes under an injured worker case management program. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(2):230–240.
  • Sandstrom J, Esbjornsson E. Return to work after rehabilitation. The significance of the patient’s own prediction. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1986;18:29–33.
  • Centre for Clinical Practice at NICE (UK). Rehabilitation after critical illness. London: National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence; 2009. p. 83.
  • van Dijk JL, Bekedam MA, Brouwer W, et al. Richtlijn Ischemische Hartziekten [Guideline Ischemic Heart Disease]. Utrecht: 2007 [cited 2019 Feb 21]. Available from: www.nvab-online.nl.
  •  Vooijs IM. Supporting work participation of people with a chronic disease. 2018.
  • De Koninklijke Nederlandsche Maatschappij tot bevordering der Geneeskunst (KNMG). KNMG RGS Overzicht aantal geregistreerde specialisten/profielartsen 2008–2018 [Royal Dutch Society for the Advancement of Medicine, Registration Committee for Medical Specialists. Overview number of registered specialists/profile doctors 2008–2018]. 20-02-2018. 2018 [cited 2018 Oct 30]. Available from: https://www.knmg.nl/opleiding-herregistratie-carriere/rgs/registers/aantal-registraties-specialistenaois.htm.
  • McDougall J, Wright V, Rosenbaum P. The ICF model of functioning and disability: Incorporating quality of life and human development. Dev Neurorehabil. 2010;13(3):204–211.
  • World Health Organization. ICF: international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
  • Kant I, Van Amelsvoort L. Applying a biopsychosocial perspective in occupational health: Easier said than done! Work. 2017;57(2):149–151.
  • Boonen A. Werk en sociale zekerheid [Work and social security]. In: Bijlsma JWJ, Lems WF, Wildervanck-Dekker CMJ, editors. Reumatologie. Houten: Bohn Stafleu van Loghum; 2015. p. 361–371.
  • Vooijs M, van der Heide I, Leensen MCJ, et al. Richtlijn Chronisch Zieken en Werk [Guideline ‘The chronically ill and work’]. Amsterdam: Coronel Institute of Occupational Health; 2016. Available from: https://www.psynip.nl/wp-content/uploads/2017/03/Richtlijn_chronisch_zieken_en_werk_2016.pdf
  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Management of chronic pain. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013.
  • Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network (SIGN). Brain injury rehabilitation in adults. Edinburgh: SIGN; 2013. Available from: http://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign130.pdf
  • National Institute for Health and Care Excellence. Stroke rehabilitation in adults. NICE. 2013;1:44.
  • National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Depression in adults: recognition and management. Clinical Guideline [CG90]. 2009.
  • de Raaij EJ, Schröder C, Maissan FJ, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and measurement properties of the Brief Illness Perception Questionnaire-Dutch language version. Man Ther. 2012;17(4):330–335.
  • van Driel D, Hanssen D, Hilderink P, et al. Illness cognitions in later life: development and validation of the extended Illness Cognition Questionnaire (ICQ-Plus). Psychol Assess. 2016;28(9):1119–1127.
  • Shaw WS, Reme SE, Linton SJ, et al. 3rd place, PREMUS 1 best paper competition: development of the return-to-work self-efficacy (RTWSE-19) questionnaire – psychometric properties and predictive validity. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(2):109–119.
  • Gross DP, Battié MC. Work-related recovery expectations and the prognosis of chronic low back pain within a workers’ compensation setting. J Occup Environ Med. 2005;47(4):428–433.
  • Kinsinger SW, Laurenceau J-P, Carver CS, et al. Perceived partner support and psychosexual adjustment to breast cancer. Psychol Health. 2011;26(12):1571–1588.
  • IBM Corp. Released 2017. IBM SPSS statistics for windows, Version 25. Armonk (NY): IBM Corp; 2017.
  • Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
  • Capaciteitsorgaan. Capaciteitsplan 2016. Deelrapport 4. Sociaal Geneeskundigen. [Capacity plan 2016. Sub-report 4. Social Medicine]. Utrecht; 2016.
  • Shields CG, Finley MA, Chawla N, et al. Couple and family interventions in health problems. J Marital Fam Ther. 2012;38(1):265–280.
  • Martire LM, Schulz R. Involving family in psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2007;16(2):90–94.
  • Martire LM, Lustig AP, Schulz R, et al. Is it beneficial to involve a family member? A meta-analysis of psychosocial interventions for chronic illness. Health Psychol. 2004;23(6):599.
  • Netwerk Kwaliteitsontwikkeling GGZ. Generieke module: Samenwerking en ondersteuning naasten van mensen met psychische problematiek [Generic module: Collaboration with and support of significant others of people with psychological problems]. 2016 [cited 2019 Feb 5]. Available from: https://www.ggzstandaarden.nl/generieke-modules/samenwerking-en-ondersteuning-naasten-van-mensen-met-psychische-problematiek/achtergronddocumenten.
  • American Psychological Association. Public interest directorate report: family interventions. 2011 [cited 2019 Feb 13]. Avaiable from: https://www.apa.org/pi/about/publications/caregivers/practice-settings/intervention/family.
  • Pittet D, Simon A, Hugonnet S, et al. Hand hygiene among physicians: performance, beliefs, and perceptions. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141(1):1–8.
  • Askelson NM, Campo S, Lowe JB, et al. Factors related to physicians’ willingness to vaccinate girls against HPV: the importance of subjective norms and perceived behavioral control. Women Health. 2010;50(2):144–158.
  • Kretzer EK, Larson EL. Behavioral interventions to improve infection control practices. Am J Infect Control. 1998;26(3):245–253.
  • Smith M, Higgs J, Ellis E. Factors influencing clinical decision making. Clin Reason Health Prof. 2008;3:89–100.
  • van Son MAC, Hulshof CTJ, Bruinvels DJ, et al. Richtlijn Kanker en Werk [Guideline Cancer and Work]. Utrecht: NVAB; 2017.
  • Verschuren CM, Nauta AP, Bastiaanssen MHH, et al. Richtlijn ‘Eén lijn in de eerste lijn bij overspanning en burnout’ [Guideline ‘On one line in the first line in case of nervous exhaustion or burnout’]. Amsterdam/Utrecht: LVE, NHG, NVA; 2012.
  • Fortuin F. NVAB, the Netherlands society of occupational medicine. 2014 [cited 2019 Feb 26]. Available from: https://www.nvab-online.nl/english/english.