2,215
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Papers

Feasibility and short-term effects of Activity Coach+: a physical activity intervention in hard-to-reach people with a physical disability

ORCID Icon, , , , &
Pages 2769-2778 | Received 24 Jul 2019, Accepted 14 Jan 2020, Published online: 30 Jan 2020

References

  • Kohl HW, Craig CL, Lambert EV, et al. The pandemic of physical inactivity: global action for public health. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):294–305.
  • Lee IM, Shiroma EJ, Lobelo F, et al. Effect of physical inactivity on major non-communicable diseases worldwide: an analysis of burden of disease and life expectancy. Lancet. 2012;380(9838):219–229.
  • Caspersen CJ, Powell KE, Christenson GM. Physical activity, exercise, and physical fitness: definitions and distinctions for health-related research. Public Health Rep. 1985;100(2):126–131.
  • Andersen LB, Mota J, Di Pietro L. Update on the global pandemic of physical inactivity. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1255–1256.
  • Warburton DE, Bredin SS. Health benefits of physical activity: a systematic review of current systematic reviews. Curr Opin Cardiol. 2017;32(5):541–556.
  • Heath GW, Fentem PH. Physical activity among persons with disabilities—a public health perspective. Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 1997;25:195–234.
  • Carroll DD, Courtney-Long EA, Stevens AC, et al. Vital signs: disability and physical activity – United States, 2009–2012. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2014;63(18):407–413.
  • Krops LA, Jaarsma EA, Dijkstra PU, et al. Health related quality of life in a Dutch Rehabilitation Population: reference values and the effect of physical activity. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169169.
  • Van Den Berg-Emons RJ, Bussmann JB, Stam HJ. Accelerometry-based activity spectrum in persons with chronic physical conditions. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(12):1856–1861.
  • von Heijden A, van den Dool R, van Lindert C, et al. Monitor sport- en beweegdeelname van mensen met een handicap [(Un)limited exercise 2013. Monitoring sport- and exercise participation in handicapped people]. Utrecht (The Netherlands): Mulier Instituut/Arko Sports Media; 2013.
  • Ma JK, Martin Ginis KA. A meta-analysis of physical activity interventions in people with physical disabilities: content, characteristics, and effects on behaviour. Psychol Sport Exerc. 2018;34:262–273.
  • Mendoza-Vasconez AS, Linke S, Munoz M, et al. Promoting physical activity among underserved populations. Curr Sports Med Rep. 2016;15(4):290–297.
  • Martin Ginis KA, Ma JK, Latimer-Cheung AE, et al. Systematic review of review articles addressing factors related to physical activity participation among children and adults with physical disabilities. Health Psychol Rev. 2016;7199:1–31.
  • Rimmer JH, Chen MD, McCubbin JA, et al. Exercise intervention research on persons with disabilities: what we know and where we need to go. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;89(3):249–263.
  • Cervantes CM, Taylor WC. Physical activity interventions in adult populations with disabilities: a review. Quest. 2011;63(4):385–410.
  • Rosenberg DE, Bombardier CH, Hoffman JM, et al. Physical activity among persons aging with mobility disabilities: shaping a research agenda. J Aging Res. 2011;2011:1–16.
  • Krops LA, Dekker R, Geertzen JHB, et al. Development of an intervention to stimulate physical activity in hard-to-reach physically disabled people and design of a pilot-implementation: an Intervention Mapping approach. BMJ Open. 2018;8(3):e020934.
  • Bartholomew LK, Parcel GS, Kok G, et al. Planning health promotion programs; an intervention mapping approach. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass; 2011.
  • Ajzen I. The theory of planned behavior. Organ Behav Hum Decis Process. 1991;50(2):179–211.
  • Bandura A. Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1986.
  • Jull J, Giles A, Graham ID. Community-based participatory research and integrated knowledge translation: advancing the co-creation of knowledge. Implement Sci. 2017;12(1):150.
  • Kenniscentrum Sport. Netwerk in Beweging [Knowledge Center Sports. Network in movement]; 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 7]. Available from: https://www.netwerkinbeweging.nl/interventies/overzicht/22530?mode=Mode-all&trefwoorden=beweegcoach&leeftijdscategorie=&beoordeling=&thema=&doelgroep=&setting=&sport=. Dutch
  • Krops LA, Folkertsma N, Hols DH, et al. Target population’s requirements on a community-based intervention for stimulating physical activity in hard-to-reach physically disabled people: an interview study. Disabil Rehabil. 2019;41:2272–2279.
  • Goodman JM, Thomas SG, Burr J. Evidence-based risk assessment and recommendations for exercise testing and physical activity clearance in apparently healthy individuals. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2011;36:S12–S32.
  • Hoekstra F, Hettinga FJ, Alingh RA, et al. The current implementation status of the integration of sports and physical activity into Dutch rehabilitation care. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(2):181–186.
  • Fanchamps MHJ, Horemans HLD, Ribbers GM, et al. The accuracy of the detection of body postures and movements using a physical activity monitor in people after a stroke. Sensors (Switzerland). 2018;18(7):2167.
  • Segura-Ortí E, Martínez-Olmos FJ. Test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change scores for sit-to-stand-to-sit tests, the six-minute walk test, the one-leg heel-rise test, and handgrip strength in people undergoing hemodialysis. Phys Ther. 2011;91(8):1244–1252.
  • Collen F, Wade D, Bradshaw C. Mobility after stroke: reliability of measures of impairment and disability. Disabil Rehabil. 1990;12:6–9.
  • Tyson S, Connell L. The psychometric properties and clinical utility of measures of walking and mobility in neurological conditions: a systematic review. Clin Rehabil. 2009;23(11):1018–1033.
  • Bellet RN, Adams L, Morris NR. The 6-minute walk test in outpatient cardiac rehabilitation: validity, reliability and responsiveness—a systematic review. Physiother (United Kingdom). 2012;98:277–287.
  • Berg K, Wood-Dauphinee S, Williams JI, et al. Measuring balance in the elderly: preliminary development of an instrument. Physiother Canada. 1989;41(6):304–311.
  • Van der Zee KI, Sanderman R. Het meten van de algemene gezondheidstoestand met de RAND-36. een handleiding [Measuring general health status with the RAND-36. Users manual]. 2nd ed. Groningen (The Netherlands): Research Institute SHARE; 2012. Available from: https://www.umcg.nl/SiteCollectionDocuments/research/institutes/SHARE/assessment tools/handleiding_rand36_2e_druk.pdf. Dutch
  • Elbers RG, Rietberg MB, Van Wegen EEH, et al. Self-report fatigue questionnaires in multiple sclerosis, Parkinson’s disease and stroke: a systematic review of measurement properties. Qual Life Res. 2012;21(6):925–944.
  • Nooijen CFJ, Post MWM, Spijkerman DCM, et al. Exercise self-efficacy in persons with spinal cord injury: psychometric properties of the Dutch translation of the Exercise Self-Efficacy Scale. J Rehabil Med. 2013;45(4):347–350.
  • Post MWM, de Witte LP, Reichrath E, et al. Development and validation of impact-s, an ICF-based questionnaire to measure activities and participation. J Rehabil Med. 2008;40(8):620–627.
  • Alingh RA, Hoekstra F, van der Schans CP, et al. Protocol of a longitudinal cohort study on phyiscal activity behaviour in physically disabled patients participating in a rehabilitation counselling programme: ReSpAct. BMJ Open. 2015;5(1):e007591.
  • Wendel-Vos GCW, Schuit AJ, Saris WHM, et al. Reproducibility and relative validity of the short questionnaire to assess health-enhancing physical activity. J Clin Epidemiol. 2003;56(12):1163–1169.
  • Blum L, Korner-Bitensky N. Usefulness of the Berg Balance Scale in stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review. Phys Ther. 2008;88(5):559–566.
  • Krops LA, Wolthuizen L, Dijkstra PU, et al. Reliability of translation of the RAND 36-item health survey in a post-rehabilitation population. Int J Rehabil Res. 2018;41(2):128–137.
  • Rosti-Otajärvi E, Hämäläinen P, Wiksten A, et al. Validity and reliability of the Fatigue Severity Scale in Finnish multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Behav. 2017;7(7):e00743.
  • Migueles JH, Cadenas-Sanchez C, Ekelund U, et al. Accelerometer data collection and processing criteria to assess physical activity and other outcomes: a systematic review and practical considerations. Sports Med. 2017;47:1821–1845.
  • Cohen J. Statistical power for the social sciences. Hillsdale (NJ): Laurence Erlbaum Assoc.; 1988.
  • James SL, Abate D, Abate KH, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 354 diseases and injuries for 195 countries and territories, 1990–2017: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):1789–1858.
  • Greaves CJ, Sheppard KE, Abraham C, et al. Systematic review of reviews of intervention components associated with increased effectiveness in dietary and physical activity interventions. BMC Public Health. 2011;11(1):119.
  • Michie S, Abraham C, Whittington C, et al. Effective techniques in healthy eating and physical activity interventions: a meta-regression. Heal Psychol. 2009;28(6):690–701.
  • Avery L, Flynn D, Van Wersch A, et al. Changing physical activity behavior in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of behavioral interventions. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(12):2681–2689.
  • Visscher TLS, Seidell JC. Time trends (1993–1997) and seasonal variation in body mass index and waist circumference in the Netherlands. Int J Obes. 2004;28(10):1309–1316.
  • Latham NK, Mehta V, Nguyen AM, et al. Performance-based or self-report measures of physical function: which should be used in clinical trials of hip fracture patients? Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2008;89(11):2146–2155.
  • Perera S, Mody SH, Woodman RC, et al. Meaningful change and responsiveness in common physical performance measures in older adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2006;54(5):743–749.
  • Holland AE, Hill CJ, Rasekaba T, et al. Updating the minimal important difference for six-minute walk distance in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(2):221–225.
  • Steffen T, Seney M. Test–retest reliability and minimal detectable change on balance and ambulation tests, the 36-item short-form health survey, and the unified Parkinson disease rating scale in people with parkinsonism. Phys Ther. 2008;88(6):733–746.
  • Gervasoni E, Jonsdottir J, Montesano A, et al. Minimal clinically important difference of berg balance scale in people with multiple sclerosis. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2017;98(2):337–340.e2.
  • Wyrwich KW, Tierney WM, Babu AN, et al. A comparison of clinically important differences in health-related quality of life for patients with chronic lung disease, asthma, or heart disease. Heal Serv Res. 2005;40(2):577–591.
  • Kim JK, Park MG, Shin SJ. What is the minimum clinically important difference in grip strength? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(8):2536–2541.
  • Centraal Bureau voor de Statistiek. Laag en langdurig laag inkomen; huishoudenskenmerken en regio [Statistics Netherlands. Low- and long term low incomes; household- and region characteristics]; 2017 [cited 2018 Jan 23]. Available from: https://www.volksgezondheidenzorg.info/onderwerp/sociaaleconomische-status/regionaal-internationaal/regionaal#node-huishoudens-met-laag-inkomen-gemeente
  • Van Zon SKR, Snieder H, Bültmann U, et al. The interaction of socioeconomic position and type 2 diabetes mellitus family history: a cross-sectional analysis of the Lifelines Cohort and Biobank Study. BMJ Open. 2017;7(4):e015275.
  • Giles-Corti B, Donovan RJ. Socioeconomic status differences in recreational physical activity levels and real and perceived access to a supportive physical environment. Prev Med (Baltim). 2002;35(6):601–611.
  • Adler RH. Engel’s biopsychosocial model is still relevant today. J Psychosom Res. 2009;67(6):607–611.