Development of the MobQoL patient reported outcome measure for mobility-related quality of life

References

• Department for Work and Pensions. Family resources survey 2017/2018. London: Department for Work and Pensions; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• NHS Improving Quality. Right chair, right time, right now. London: NHS Improving Quality; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• National Wheelchair Managers Forum. Healthcare standards for NHS commissioned wheelchair services. London: National Wheelchair Managers Forum; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE). Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Pettitt DA, Raza S, Naughton B, et al. The limitations of QALY: a literature review. J Stem Cell Res Ther. 2016;6:334.
   Google Scholar
• Young N, Rochon T, McCormick A, et al. The health and quality of life outcomes among youth and young adults with cerebral palsy. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010;91(1):143–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston MH, Rosenbaum PL. Adolescents with cerebral palsy: stability in measurement of quality of life and health-related quality of life over 1 year. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2008;50(9):696–701.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenbaum PL, Livingston MH, Palisano RJ, et al. Quality of life and health-related quality of life of adolescents with cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2007;49(7):516–521.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Young NL, Sheridan K, Burke TA, et al. Health outcomes among youths and adults with Spina bifida. J Pediatr. 2013;162(5):993–998.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sims-Williams HJ, Sims-Williams HP, Mbabazi Kabachelor E, et al. Quality of life among children with spina bifida in Uganda. Arch Dis Child. 2017;102(11):1057–1061.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Usuba K, Oddson B, Gauthier A, et al. Changes in gross motor function and health-related quality of life in adults with cerebral palsy: an 8-year follow-up study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2071–2077.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray N, Noyes J, Harris N, et al. Measuring the health-related quality of life of children with impaired mobility: examining correlation and agreement between children and parent proxies. BMC Res Notes. 2017;10(1):1–8.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Burström K, Bartonek A, Broström EW, et al. EQ-5D-Y as a health-related quality of life measure in children and adolescents with functional disability in Sweden: testing feasibility and validity. Acta Paediatr. 2014;103(4):426–435.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bartonek A, Saraste H, Danielsson D. Health-related quality of life and ambulation in children with myelomeningocele in a Swedish population. Acta Paediatr. 2012;101(9):953–956.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ubel PA, Loewenstein G, Jepson C. Whose quality of life? A commentary exploring discrepancies between health state evaluations of patients and the general public. Qual Life Res. 2003;12(6):599–607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dolan P, Kahneman D. Interpretations of utility and their implications for the valuation of health. Econ J. 2008;118(525):215–234.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Versteegh MM, Brouwer WB. Patient and general public preferences for health states: a call to reconsider current guidelines. Soc Sci Med. 2016;16:16–74.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier J, Rowen D, Karimi M, et al. Experience-based utility and own health state valuation for a health state classification system: why and how to do it. Eur J Health Econ. 2018;19(6):881–891.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin E, Green C. A systematic review of the literature on the development of condition-specific preference-based measures of health. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2016;14(2):161–183.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Misajon R, Hawthorne G, Richardson J, et al. Vision and quality of life: the development of a utility measure. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(11):4007–4015.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mulhern B, Rowen D, Jacoby A, et al. The development of a QALY measure for epilepsy: NEWQOL-6D. Epilepsy Behav. 2012;24(1):36–43.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goodwin E, Green C. A quality-adjusted life-year measure for multiple sclerosis: developing a patient-reported health state classification system for a multiple sclerosis-specific preference-based measure. Value Health. 2015;18(8):1016–1024.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demers L, Weiss-Lambrou R, Ska B, et al. The Quebec User Evaluation of Satisfaction with Assistive Technology (QUEST 2.0): an overview and recent progress. Technol Disabil. 2002;14(3):101–105.
   Google Scholar
• Mills T, Holm MB, Trefler E, et al. Development and consumer validation of the Functional Evaluation in a Wheelchair (FEW) instrument. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):38–46.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stanley RK, Stafford DJ, Rasch E, et al. Development of a functional assessment measure for manual wheelchair users. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2003;40(4):301–307.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Day H, Jutai J. Measuring the psychosocial impact of assistive devices: the PIADS. Can J Rehabil. 1996;9(2):159–168.
   Google Scholar
• Cusick A, McIntyre S, Novak I, et al. A comparison of goal attainment scaling and the Canadian occupational performance measure for paediatric rehabilitation research. Pediatr Rehabil. 2006;9(2):149–157.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mortenson WB, Miller WC, Miller-Pogar J. Measuring wheelchair intervention outcomes: development of the wheelchair outcomes measure. Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2007;2(5):275–285.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Tuersley L, Bray N, Edwards RT. Development of the Wheelchair outcomes Assessment Tool for Children (WATCh): a patient-centred outcome measure for young wheelchair users. PLoS One. 2018;13(12):e0209380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Rowen D, Mavranezouli I, et al. Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome). Health Technol Assess. 2012;16(32):1–113.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Office for Disability Issues. Equality Act 2010 guidance: guidance on matters to be taken into account in determining questions relating to the definition of disability. London: Office for Disability Issues; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Bogart KR. The role of disability self-concept in adaptation to congenital or acquired disability. Rehabil Psychol. 2014;59(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Antin TMJ, Constantine NA, Hunt G. Conflicting discourses in qualitative research: the search for divergent data within cases. Field Methods. 2015;27(3):211–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Spencer L. Qualitative data analysis for applied policy research. In: Bryman A, Burgess R, editors. Analysing qualitative data. London: Routledge; 1994. p. 173–194.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative research practice: a guide for social science students and researchers. 2nd ed. London: Sage; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bray N, Noyes J, Harris N, et al. Defining health-related quality of life for young wheelchair users: a qualitative health economics study. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noyes J, Spencer LH, Bray N, et al. Conceptualization of physical exercise and keeping fit by child wheelchair users and their parents. J Adv Nurs. 2017;73(5):1111–1123.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowen D, Brazier J, Ara R, et al. The role of condition-specific preference-based measures in health technology assessment. PharmacoEconomics. 2017;35(S1):33–41.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kenny S, Gowran R. Outcome measures for wheelchair and seating provision: a critical appraisal. Br J Occup Ther. 2014;77(2):67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar