Restricted mobility and unheard voices: perceptions of accessibility and inclusion expressed on Romanian disability-specific blogs and forums

References

• Oliver M. Defining impairment and disability: issues at stake. In: Barnes Colin, Mercer Geof, editors. Exploring the divide. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1996. p. 29–54.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. Disability, identity and difference. In: Barnes Colin, Mercer Geof, editors. Exploring the divide. Leeds: The Disability Press; 1996. p. 94–113.
   Google Scholar
• Shakespeare T. The social model of disability. In Davis LJ, editor. The disability studies reader. New York: Routledge; 2006. p. 197–204.
   Google Scholar
• Ritchie H, Blanck P. The promise of the internet for disability: a study of on‐line services and web site accessibility at centers for independent living. Behav Sci Law. 2003;21(1):5–26.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furr JB, Carreiro A, McArthur JA. Strategic approaches to disability disclosure on social media. Disabil Soc. 2016;31(10):1353–1368.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullmer S, Walls R. Interests and participation on disability-related computer bulletin boards. J Rehabil. 1994;60(1):24–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ciot MG, Van Hove G. Romanian approach to media portrayals of disability. Disabil Soc. 2010;25(5):525–538.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zhang L, Haller B. Consuming image: how mass media impact the identity of people with disabilities. Commun Quart. 2013;61(3):319–334.
   Google Scholar
• Ganahl D, Arbuckle M. The exclusion of persons with physical disabilities from prime time television advertising: a two year quantitative analysis. DSQ. 2001;21(2).
   Google Scholar
• CEN/BT/WG 207 Joint Report. Accessibility in Built Environment. Lhac.Eu. 2011 [cited 2017 Jul 21]. Available from: http://www.lhac.eu/resources/news/cen_joint_report.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ionescu I. Social policies of inclusion of the people with physical disabilities in Romania-social diagnosis. Jurnalul Practicilor Comunitare Pozitive. 2012;4:812–837.
   Google Scholar
• Phillips SD. Implications of EU accession for disability rights legislation and housing in Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2012;23(1):26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips SD. EU disability policy and implications of EU accession for disability rights in education and employment in Bulgaria, Romania, Croatia, and the Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia. J Disabil Policy Stud. 2012;22(4):208–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pașcalău-Vrabete A, Băban A. Is “different” still unacceptable? Exploring the experience of mobility disability within the Romanian social and built environment. Disabil Soc. 2018;33(10):1601–1619.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mladenov T. From state socialist to neoliberal productivism: disability policy and invalidation of disabled people in the postsocialist region. Crit Sociol. 2017;43(7–8):1109–1123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ilie S. Employing people with disabilities: the Romanian protected units system. Jurnalul Practicilor Comunitare Pozitive. 2013;1:61–91.
   Google Scholar
• Ghergut A. National policies on education and strategies for inclusion; case study-Romania. Proc Soc Behav Sci. 2011;29:1693–1700.
   Google Scholar
• The Nattional Authority for Disabled persons. Available from: http://anpd.gov.ro/web/despre-noi/misiune/
   Google Scholar
• Law no. 448/2006 Regarding the Protection and Promotion of the Rights of People with Handicap, republished in 2008. Available from: http://www.mmuncii.ro/pub/imagemanager/images/file/Legislatie/LEGI/L448-2006_rep.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Labor and Social Justice. Number of People with a Handicap Trimester IV, 2018. Anpd.gov.ro. 2018. Available from: http://anpd.gov.ro/web/transparenta/statistici/trimestriale/
   Google Scholar
• Stamatin V. 2010. The social perception of disabled people in Romania [PhD diss.]. Babes-Bolyai University.
   Google Scholar
• Neville S, Adams J, Cook C. Using internet-based approaches to collect qualitative data from vulnerable groups: reflections from the field. Contemp Nurse. 2015;52(6):657–668.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eysenbach G, Till JE. Ethical issues in qualitative research on internet communities. BMJ. 2001;323(7321):1103–1105.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewis D, Eysenbach G, Kukafka R, et al. 2005. Consumer health informatics: informing consumers and improving health care. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cook C. Email interviewing: generating data with a vulnerable population. J Adv Nurs. 2012;68(6):1330–1339.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loukisas TD, Papoudi D. Mothers’ experiences of children in the autistic spectrum in Greece: narratives of development, education and disability across their blogs. Int J Disabil Dev Educ. 2016;63(1):64–78.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garland‐Thomson R. Misfits: a feminist materialist disability concept. Hypatia. 2011;26(3):591–609.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fusch PI, Ness LR. Are we there yet? Data saturation in qualitative research. Qual Report. 2015;20(9):1408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke V, Braun V. Thematic analysis. J Positive Psychol. 2017;12(3):297–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clarke V, Braun V, Hayfield N. Thematic analysis. In: Smith J, editor. Qualitative psychology: a practical guide to research methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage; 2015. p. 222–248.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts LD. Ethical issues in conducting qualitative research in online communities. Qual Res Psychol. 2015;12(3):314–325.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rodham K, Gavin J. The ethics of using the internet to collect qualitative research data. Res Ethics Rev. 2006;2(3):92–97.
   Google Scholar
• Bradley SK, Carter B. Reflections on the ethics of Internet newsgroup research. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012;49(5):625–630.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scotch RK. Politics and policy in the history of the disability rights movement. Milbank Quart. 1989;67:380–400.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Campbell FK. Disability harms: exploring internalized ableism. In: Marshall CA, Kendall E, Banks ME, Gover RMS, editors. Disabilities: insights from across fields and around the world, vol. 1. Westport (CT): Greenwood Publishing Group; 2009. p. 19–33.
   Google Scholar
• Alexandru V, Moraru A, Ercus L, et al. Accesibilizarea spaţiului public pentru persoanele cu dizabilităţi. Obligaţii si provocări pentru instituţiile publice. E-Accesibilitate.Ro. 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Tudorache LA, Folostina R, Tutunea J, et al. Disability as a risk factor on the access to labor market. Rev Appl Socio-Econ Res. 2013;5(1):130–135.
   Google Scholar
• National Employment Agency. 2017 [cited 2017 Jul 21]. Available from: http://www.anofm.ro/statistica
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov T. Neoliberalism, postsocialism, disability. Disabil Soc. 2015;30(3):445–459.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Authority for Disabled Persons. Classification into type and degree of handicap. 2017. Available from: http://anpd.gov.ro/web/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/Incadrarea-in-grad-si-tip-de-handicap.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Green S, Davis C, Karshmer E, et al. Living stigma: the impact of labeling, stereotyping, separation, status loss, and discrimination in the lives of individuals with disabilities and their families. Sociol Inq. 2005;75(2):197–215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pererya D. Accessibility for different abilities: a report. CJDS. 2016;5(1):158–182.
   Google Scholar
• Noreau L, Fougeyrollas P, Boschen K. Perceived influence of the environment on social participation among individuals with spinal cord injury. Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2002;7(3):56–72.
   Google Scholar
• Gray DB, Gould M, Bickenbach JE. Environmental barriers and disability. J Archit Plann Res. 2003;20(1):29–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rimmer JH, Rowland JL. Health promotion for people with disabilities: implications for empowering the person and promoting disability-friendly environments. Am J Lifestyle Med. 2008;2(5):409–420.
   Google Scholar
• Richardson EV, Smith B, Papathomas A. Disability and the gym: experiences, barriers and facilitators of gym use for individuals with physical disabilities. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(19):1950–1957.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joseph M, Saravanabavan S, Nisker J. Physicians’ perceptions of barriers to equal access to reproductive health promotion for women with mobility impairment. CJDS. 2018;7(1):62–100.
   Google Scholar
• Imrie RF, Wells PE. Disablism, planning, and the built environment. Environ Plann C Gov Policy. 1993;11(2):213–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schur L, Kruse D, Blasi J, et al. Is disability disabling in all workplaces? Workplace disparities and corporate culture. Ind Relat. 2009;48(3):381–410.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Watermeyer B, Görgens T. Disability and internalized oppression. In: David EJR, editor. Internalized oppression: The psychology of marginalized groups. New York (NY): Springer; 2014. p. 253–280.
   Google Scholar
• Grenier A, Phillipson C, Laliberte Rudman D, et al. Precarity in late life: understanding new forms of risk and insecurity. J Aging Stud. 2017;43:9–14.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crăciun I.C. Aging in precarious times. Alter Und Geschlecht. 2018:163–175.
   Google Scholar
• Mladenov T. Deficient bodies and inefficient resources: the case of disability assessment in Bulgaria. Disabil Soc. 2011;26(4):477–490.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daruwalla P, Darcy S. Personal and societal attitudes to disability. Ann Tour Res. 2005;32(3):549–570.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar