Clustering of functioning and disability profile based on the WHO disability assessment schedule 2.0 – a nationwide databank study

References

• Chi WC, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, et al. Measuring disability and its predicting factors in a large database in Taiwan using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(12):12148–12161.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeremic B, Milicic B, Milisavljevic S. Clinical prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced (stage III) nonsmall cell lung cancer treated with hyperfractionated radiation therapy with and without concurrent chemotherapy: single-Institution Experience in 600 Patients. Cancer. 2011;117(13):2995–3003.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization (WHO). World report on disability. Lancet 2011;377:1977.
   Google Scholar
• Alleyne G, Binagwaho A, Haines A, Jahan S, et al.; Lancet NCD Action Group. Embedding non-communicable diseases in the post-2015 development agenda. Lancet. 2013;381(9866):566–574.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SW, Chi WC, Chang KH, Yen CF, et al. World health organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 as an objective assessment tool for predicting return to work after a stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2592–2597.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SW, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, Hu CJ, et al. Using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) for predicting institutionalization of patients with dementia in Taiwan. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e2155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SW, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, Chi WC, et al. Functioning and disability analysis by using WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 in older adults Taiwanese patients with dementia. Disabil Rehabil. 2016;38(17):1652–1663.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee YH, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, et al. Accuracy of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) score as an objective assessment tool for predicting return-to-work status after head and neck cancer in male survivors. Support Care Cancer. 2019;27(2):433–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. World Report on Disability. Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Leong KI, Chen YC, Chen JH. Dementia: a focused review. J Intern Med Taiwan. 2014;25:151–157.
   Google Scholar
• Needham DM, Feldman DR, Kho ME. The functional costs of ICU survivorship. Collaborating to improve post-ICU disability. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011;183(8):962–964.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seidel M. The international classification of functioning, disability and health. Nervenarzt. 2005;76(1):79–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• World Health Organization International classification of functioning,disability and health (ICF). Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Federici S, Bracalenti M, Meloni F, et al. World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0: an international systematic review. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(23):2347–2380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiu TY, Yen CF, Chou CH, et al. Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36–item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses. Res Dev Disabil. 2014;35(11):2812–2820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stucki G, Ewert T, Cieza A. Value and application of the ICF in rehabilitation medicine. Disabil Rehabil. 2003;25(11-12):628–634.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ustun TB, Chatterji S, Kostanjsek N, Rehm J, et al.; WHO/NIH Joint Project. Developing the World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0. Bull World Health Organ. 2010;88(11):815–823.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Üstün TBK N, Chatterji S, Rehm J, editors. Measuring health and disability: manual for WHO Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0). Geneva (Switzerland): World Health Organization; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. Washington (DC): American Psychiatric Association; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Chang KH, Liao HF, Yen CF, et al. Association between muscle power impairment and WHODAS 2.0 in older adults with physical disability in Taiwan. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(8):712–720.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rocha V, Marques A, Pinto M, et al. People with dementia in long-term care facilities: an exploratory study of their activities and participation. Disabil Rehabil. 2013;35(18):1501–1508.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huang SW, Chang KH, Escorpizo R, et al. WHODAS 2.0 can predict institutionalization among patients with traumatic brain injury. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2019;16:1484.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu HY, Chi WC, Chang KH, Yen CF, et al. The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 can predict the institutionalization of patients with stroke. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2017;53(6):856–862.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leonard K, Abramovitch A. Cognitive functions in young adults with generalized anxiety disorder. Eur Psychiatry. 2019;56:1–7.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson RA, Winchern DW. Applied multivariate statistical analysis. 6th ed. Upper Saddle River: Pearson Prentice Hall; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Clarke P, Marshall V, Black SE, et al. Well-being after stroke in Canadian seniors: findings from the Canadian Study of Health and Aging. Stroke. 2002;33(4):1016–1021.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skolarus LE, Burke JF, Brown DL, et al. Understanding stroke survivorship: expanding the concept of poststroke disability. Stroke. 2014;45(1):224–230.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hardie K, Hankey GJ, Jamrozik K, et al. Ten-year risk of first recurrent stroke and disability after first-ever stroke in the Perth Community Stroke Study. Stroke. 2004;35(3):731–735.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feigin VL, Barker-Collo S, Parag V, Senior H, et al.; For the ASTRO study group. Auckland stroke outcomes study. Part 1: gender, stroke types, ethnicity, and functional outcomes 5 years poststroke. Neurology. 2010;75(18):1597–1607.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liman TG, Heuschmann PU, Endres M, et al. Impact of low mini-mental status on health outcome up to 5 years after stroke: the Erlangen Stroke Project. J Neurol. 2012;259(6):1125–1130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ayerbe L, Ayis S, Rudd AG, et al. Natural history, predictors, and associations of depression 5 years after stroke: the South London Stroke Register. Stroke. 2011;42(7):1907–1911.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luengo-Fernandez R, Paul NL, Gray AM, et al. Population-based study of disability and institutionalization after Transient Ischemic Attack and stroke: 10-year results of the Oxford Vascular Study. Stroke. 2013;44(10):2854–2861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tripathi A, Kar SK, Shukla R. Cognitive deficits in schizophrenia: understanding the biological correlates and remediation strategies. Clin Psychopharmacol Neurosci. 2018;16(1):7–17.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin FR, Yaffe K, Xia J, Xue QL, et al.; Health ABC Study Group. Simonsick EM and others. Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;173(4):293–299.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linszen MM, Brouwer RM, Heringa SM, et al. Increased risk of psychosis in patients with hearing impairment: review and meta-analyses. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016;62:1–20.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiam NT, Li C, Agrawal Y. Hearing loss and falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Laryngoscope. 2016;126(11):2587–2596.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andrews AO, Bartels SJ, Xie H, et al. Increased risk of nursing home admission among middle aged and older adults with schizophrenia. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;17(8):697–705.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muralidharan A, Finch A, Bowie CR, et al. Thought, language, and communication deficits and association with everyday functional outcomes among community-dwelling middle-aged and older adults with schizophrenia. Schizophr Res. 2018;196:29–34.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Polis S, Fernandez R. Impact of physical and psychological factors on health-related quality of life in adult patients with liver cirrhosis: a systematic review protocol. JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015;13(1):39–51.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Abdel-Kader K, Unruh ML, Weisbord SD. Symptom burden, depression, and quality of life in chronic and end-stage kidney disease. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2009;4(6):1057–1064.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cannon JA, Moffitt P, Perez-Moreno AC, et al. Cognitive impairment and heart failure: systematic review and meta-analysis. J Card Fail. 2017;23(6):464–475.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moorthi RN, Latham-Mintus K. Social isolation in chronic kidney disease and the role of mobility limitation. Clin Kidney J. 2019;12(4):602–610.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janani K, Jain M, Vargese J, et al. Health-related quality of life in liver cirrhosis patients using SF-36 and CLDQ questionnaires. Clin Exp Hepatol. 2018;4(4):232–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Erickson KF, Zhao B, Ho V, et al. Employment among patients starting dialysis in the United States. Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2018;13(2):265–273.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aberg F. From prolonging life to prolonging working life: Tackling unemployment among liver-transplant recipients. World J Gastroenterol. 2016;22:3701–3711.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang TJ, Lu MH, Kuo PL, et al. Influences of facial disfigurement and social support for psychosocial adjustment among patients with oral cancer in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(11):e023670.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bolt S, Eadie T, Yorkston K, et al. Variables associated with communicative participation after head and neck cancer. JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016;142(12):1145–1151.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oster C, Kildal M, Ekselius L. Return to work after burn injury: burn-injured individuals' perception of barriers and facilitators. J Burn Care Res. 2010;31(4):540–550.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyster-Aas J, Kildal M, Willebrand M. Return to work and health-related quality of life after burn injury. J Rehabil Med. 2007;39(1):49–55.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider JC, Bassi S, Ryan CM. Employment outcomes after burn injury: a comparison of those burned at work and those burned outside of work. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32:294–301.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Esselman PC, Askay SW, Carrougher GJ, et al. Barriers to return to work after burn injuries. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2007;88(12 Suppl 2):S50–S6.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar