Experience of enriched rehabilitation in the chronic phase of stroke

References

• Collaborators GS. Global, regional, and national burden of stroke, 1990-2016: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2016. Lancet Neurol. 2019;18(5):439–458.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Bernhardt J, Kwakkel G. Stroke rehabilitation. Lancet. 2011;377(9778):1693–1702.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Veerbeek JM, van Wegen E, van Peppen R, et al. What is the evidence for physical therapy poststroke? A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(2):e87987.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock EA, Farmer CS, Brady EM, et al. Cochrane overview: interventions for improving upper limb function after stroke. Stroke. 2015;46(3):e57–e58.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhorne P, Coupar F, Pollock A. Motor recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Lancet Neurol. 2009;8(8):741–754.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett D, Nguemeni C, Gomez-Smith M. How can you mend a broken brain? Neurorestorative approaches to stroke recovery. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2014;38(4):233–239.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollock A, Baer G, Campbell P, et al. Physical rehabilitation approaches for the recovery of function and mobility following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(4):CD001920.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer S, Verheyden G, Brinkmann N, et al. Functional and motor outcome 5 years after stroke is equivalent to outcome at 2 months: follow-up of the collaborative evaluation of rehabilitation in stroke across Europe. Stroke. 2015;46(6):1613–1619.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Livingston-Thomas J, Nelson P, Karthikeyan S, et al. Exercise and environmental enrichment as enablers of task-specific neuroplasticity and stroke recovery. Neurotherapeutics. 2016;13(2):395–402.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mala H, Rasmussen CP. The effect of combined therapies on recovery after acquired brain injury: Systematic review of preclinical studies combining enriched environment, exercise, or task-specific training with other therapies. Restor Neurol Neurosci. 2017;35(1):25–64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vive S, af Geijerstam J-L, Kuhn HG, et al. Enriched, task-specific therapy in the chronic phase after stroke: an exploratory study. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2020;44(2):145–155.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Will B, Galani R, Kelche C, et al. Recovery from brain injury in animals: relative efficacy of environmental enrichment, physical exercise or formal training (1990-2002). Prog Neurobiol. 2004;72(3):167–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nithianantharajah J, Hannan AJ. Enriched environments, experience-dependent plasticity and disorders of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2006;7(9):697–709.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jeffers MS, Corbett D. Synergistic effects of enriched environment and task-specific reach training on poststroke recovery of motor function. Stroke. 2018;49(6):1496–1503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbett D, Jeffers M, Nguemeni C, et al. Lost in translation: rethinking approaches to stroke recovery. Prog Brain Res. 2015;218:413–434.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venna VR, Xu Y, Doran SJ, et al. Social interaction plays a critical role in neurogenesis and recovery after stroke. Transl Psychiatry. 2014;4:e351.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Janssen H, Ada L, Bernhardt J, et al. An enriched environment increases activity in stroke patients undergoing rehabilitation in a mixed rehabilitation unit: a pilot non-randomized controlled trial. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(3):255–262.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Khan F, Amatya B, Elmalik A, et al. An enriched environmental programme during inpatient neuro-rehabilitation: A randomized controlled trial. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(5):417–425.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bunketorp-Kall L, Lundgren-Nilsson A, Samuelsson H, et al. Long-term improvements after multimodal rehabilitation in late phase after stroke: a randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2017;48(7):1916–1924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonald MW, Hayward KS, Rosbergen ICM, et al. Is environmental enrichment ready for clinical application in human post-stroke rehabilitation? [Review]. Front Behav Neurosci. 2018;12:135. English.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daly J, Willis K, Small R, et al. A hierarchy of evidence for assessing qualitative health research. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):43–49.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKevitt C, Redfern J, Mold F, et al. Qualitative studies of stroke: a systematic review. Stroke. 2004;35(6):1499–1505.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White JH, Bartley E, Janssen H, et al. Exploring stroke survivor experience of participation in an enriched environment: a qualitative study. Disabil Rehabil. 2015;37(7):593–600.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Medical Research Council Guidance, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moore GF, Audrey S, Barker M, et al. Process evaluation of complex interventions: Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2015;350:h1258.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Malterud K, Siersma VD, Guassora AD. Sample size in qualitative interview studies: guided by information power. Qual Health Res. 2016;26(13):1753–1760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln YS, Guba EG. Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills (CA): Sage Publications; 1985.
   Google Scholar
• Elo S, Kyngas H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halkier B. Focus groups as social enactments: integrating interaction and content in the analysis of focus group data. Qual Res. 2010;10(1):71–89.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moretti F, van Vliet L, Bensing J, et al. A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Educ Couns. 2011;82(3):420–428.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hsieh HF, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas DR. A general inductive approach for analyzing qualitative evaluation data. Am J Eval. 2006;27(2):237–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rabiee F. Focus-group interview and data analysis. Proc Nutr Soc. 2004;63(4):655–660.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krueger RA. Analyzing & reporting focus group results. Thousand Oaks (CA): SAGE Publications; 1997. (Focus group kit; vol. 6).
   Google Scholar
• Mansell I, Bennett G, Northway R, et al. The learning curve: the advantages and disadvantages in the use of focus groups as a method of data collection. Nurse Res. 2004;11(4):79–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kreuger RC. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage Publications; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taub E, Uswatte G. Constraint-induced movement therapy: bridging from the primate laboratory to the stroke rehabilitation laboratory. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(41 Suppl):34–40.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baxter LA. Content analysis. In: Montgomery BM, Duck S, editors. Studying interpersonal interaction. New York: Guilford; 1991. p. 239–254.
   Google Scholar
• Krippendorff K. Content analysis: an introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rankin J. Cerebral vascular accidents in patients over the age of 60. II. Prognosis. Scott Med J. 1957;2(5):200–215.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Pohl P, Carlsson G, Bunketorp Kall L, et al. Experiences from a multimodal rhythm and music-based rehabilitation program in late phase of stroke recovery – a qualitative study. PloS One. 2018;13(9):e0204215.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pohl P, Carlsson G, Bunketorp KL, et al. A qualitative exploration of post-acute stroke participants' experiences of a multimodal intervention incorporating horseback riding. PloS One. 2018;13(9):e0203933.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosbergen ICM, Grimley RS, Hayward KS, et al. Embedding an enriched environment in an acute stroke unit increases activity in people with stroke: a controlled before–after pilot study. Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(11):1516–1528.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhammer B, Stanghelle JK, Lindmark B. Exercise and health-related quality of life during the first year following acute stroke. A randomized controlled trial. Brain Inj. 2008; 22(2):135–145.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thornberg K, Josephsson S, Lindquist I. Experiences of participation in rhythm and movement therapy after stroke. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(22):1869–1874.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pound P, Bury M, Gompertz P, et al. Views of survivors of stroke on benefits of physiotherapy. Qual Health Care. 1994;3(2):69–74.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Luker J, Lynch E, Bernhardsson S, et al. Stroke survivors' experiences of physical rehabilitation: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96(9):1698–1708.e10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalemans RJP, De Witte LP, Beurskens A, et al. An investigation into the social participation of stroke survivors with aphasia. Disabil Rehabil. 2010;32(20):1678–1685.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar