Usefulness and feasibility of comprehensive and less comprehensive vocational rehabilitation for patients with chronic musculoskeletal pain: perspectives from patients, professionals, and managers

References

• Breivik H, Collett B, Ventafridda V, et al. Survey of chronic pain in Europe: prevalence, impact on daily life, and treatment. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(4):287–333.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Vroome EM, Uegaki K, van der Ploeg CP, et al. Burden of sickness absence due to chronic disease in the Dutch Workforce from 2007 to 2011. J Occup Rehabil. 2015;25(4):675–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Airaksinen O, COST B13 Working Group on Guidelines for Chronic Low Back Pain, Brox JI, Cedraschi C, et al. Chapter 4. European guidelines for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain. Eur Spine J. 2006;15(Suppl 2):S192–S300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waddell G, Burton A, Kendall N. Vocational rehabilitation: what works, for whom, and when? The Stationery Office; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Escorpizo R, Reneman MF, Ekholm J, et al. A conceptual definition of vocational rehabilitation based on the ICF: building a shared global model. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):126–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, van Oostrom SH, de Vet HC, et al. Workplace interventions to prevent work disability in workers on sick leave. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015;(10):CD006955.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Palmer KT, Harris EC, Linaker C, et al. Effectiveness of community- and workplace-based interventions to manage musculoskeletal-related sickness absence and job loss: a systematic review. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(2):230–242.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cullen KL, Irvin E, Collie A, et al. Effectiveness of workplace interventions in return-to-work for musculoskeletal, pain-related and mental health conditions: an update of the evidence and messages for practitioners. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waterschoot FP, Dijkstra PU, Geertzen JH, et al. Dose or content? Effectiveness of pain rehabilitation programs for patients with chronic low back pain: a systematic review. Author reply. Pain. 2014;155(9):1902–1903.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoefsmit N, Houkes I, Nijhuis FJ. Intervention characteristics that facilitate return to work after sickness absence: a systematic literature review. J Occup Rehabil. 2012;22(4):462–477.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meijer EM, Sluiter JK, Frings-Dresen MH. Evaluation of effective return-to-work treatment programs for sick-listed patients with non-specific musculoskeletal complaints: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2005;78(7):523–532.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaafsma F, Schonstein E, Whelan KM, et al. Physical conditioning programs for improving work outcomes in workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010;(1):CD001822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aasdahl L, Pape K, Vasseljen O, et al. Effect of inpatient multicomponent occupational rehabilitation versus less comprehensive outpatient rehabilitation on sickness absence in persons with musculoskeletal- or mental health disorders: a randomized clinical trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2017;27(3):456–466.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ronzi Y, Roche-Leboucher G, Begue C, et al. Efficiency of three treatment strategies on occupational and quality of life impairments for chronic low back pain patients: is the multidisciplinary approach the key feature to success? Clin Rehabil. 2017;31(10):1364–1373.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haldorsen EM, Grasdal AL, Skouen JS, et al. Is there a right treatment for a particular patient group? Comparison of ordinary treatment, light multidisciplinary treatment, and extensive multidisciplinary treatment for long-term sick-listed employees with musculoskeletal pain. Pain. 2002;95(1-2):49–63.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouen JS, Grasdal AL, Haldorsen EM, et al. Relative cost-effectiveness of extensive and light multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment as usual for patients with chronic low back pain on long-term sick leave: randomized controlled study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002;127(9):901–909. Discussion 9–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craig P, Medical Research Council Guidance, Dieppe P, Macintyre S, et al. Developing and evaluating complex interventions: the new Medical Research Council guidance. BMJ. 2008;337:a1655.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loisel P, Buchbinder R, Hazard R, et al. Prevention of work disability due to musculoskeletal disorders: the challenge of implementing evidence. J Occup Rehabil. 2005;15(4):507–524.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowen DJ, Kreuter M, Spring B, et al. How we design feasibility studies. Am J Prev Med. 2009;36(5):452–457.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams-Whitt K, Hopkinton Conference Working Group on Workplace Disability Prevention Bultmann U, Amick B, 3rd, et al. Workplace Interventions to Prevent Disability from Both the Scientific and Practice Perspectives: A Comparison of Scientific Literature, Grey Literature and Stakeholder Observations. J Occup Rehabil. 2016;26(4):417–433.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wind H, Gouttebarge V, Kuijer PP, et al. The utility of functional capacity evaluation: the opinion of physicians and other experts in the field of return to work and disability claims. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2006;79(6):528–534.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abbott JH. The distinction between randomized clinical trials (RCTs) and preliminary feasibility and pilot studies: what they are and are not. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014;44(8):555–558.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beemster TT, van Velzen JM, van Bennekom CA, et al. Cost-effectiveness of 40-hour versus 100-hour vocational rehabilitation on work participation for workers on sick leave due to subacute or chronic musculoskeletal pain: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015;16(1):317.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Law on Gate keeping Disability Insurance [Dutch: Wet verbetering poortwachter]. [cited 2018 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.arboportaal.nl/onderwerpen/wet-verbetering-poortwachter.
   Google Scholar
• Fleuren MA, Paulussen TG, Van Dommelen P, et al. Towards a measurement instrument for determinants of innovations. Int J Qual Health Care. 2014;26(5):501–510.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flottorp SA, Oxman AD, Krause J, et al. A checklist for identifying determinants of practice: a systematic review and synthesis of frameworks and taxonomies of factors that prevent or enable improvements in healthcare professional practice. Implement Sci. 2013;8:35.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Research Code VUmc-AMC. [cited 2018 Jan 22]. Available from: https://www.vumc.nl/onderzoek/research-code/.
   Google Scholar
• Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qual Res Psychol. 2006;3(2):77–101.
   Google Scholar
• Waterschoot FP, Bennen E, van der Woude LH, et al. Case complexity in patients with chronic nonspecific musculoskeletal pain: a Delphi and feasibility study. Int J Rehabil Res. 2016;39(1):48–56.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reneman MF, Waterschoot FPC, Bennen E, et al. Dosage of pain rehabilitation programs: a qualitative study from patient and professionals’ perspectives. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2018;19:206.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loeb DF, Binswanger IA, Candrian C, et al. Primary care physician insights into a typology of the complex patient in primary care. Ann Fam Med. 2015;13(5):451–455.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Selander J, Marnetoft SU, Bergroth A, et al. Return to work following vocational rehabilitation for neck, back and shoulder problems: risk factors reviewed. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(14):704–712.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viikari-Juntura E, Virta LJ, Kausto J, et al. Legislative change enabling use of early part-time sick leave enhanced return to work and work participation in Finland. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2017;43(5):447–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris A, Moe TF, Eriksen HR, et al. Brief intervention, physical exercise and cognitive behavioural group therapy for patients with chronic low back pain (The CINS trial). Eur J Pain. 2017;21(8):1397–1407.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stapelfeldt CM, Christiansen DH, Jensen OK, et al. Subgroup analyses on return to work in sick-listed employees with low back pain in a randomised trial comparing brief and multidisciplinary intervention. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2011;12:112.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elbers NA, Chase R, Craig A, et al. Health care professionals' attitudes towards evidence-based medicine in the workers' compensation setting: a cohort study . BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17(1):64.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hara KW, Borchgrevink PC, Jacobsen HB, et al. Transdiagnostic group-based occupational rehabilitation for participants with chronic pain, chronic fatigue and common mental disorders. A feasibility study. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(21):2516–2526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liukko J, Kuuva N. Cooperation of return-to-work professionals: the challenges of multi-actor work disability management. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(15):1466–1473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rise MB, Gismervik SO, Johnsen R, et al. Sick-listed persons' experiences with taking part in an in-patient occupational rehabilitation program based on acceptance and commitment therapy: a qualitative focus group interview study. BMC Health Serv Res. 2015;15:526.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allum L, Connolly B, McKeown E. Meeting the needs of critical care patients after discharge home: a qualitative exploratory study of patient perspectives. Nurs Crit Care. 2017;23(6):316–323.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar