The outcomes of individualized housing for people with disability and complex needs: a scoping review

References

• Veitch JA. Investigating and influencing how buildings affect health: interdisciplinary endeavours. Can Psychol. 2008;49(4):281–288.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kyle T, Dunn JR. Effects of housing circumstances on health, quality of life and healthcare use for people with severe mental illness: a review. Health Soc Care Community. 2008;16(1):1–15.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kavanagh AM, Aitken Z, Baker E, et al. Housing tenure and affordability and mental health following disability acquisition in adulthood. Soc Sci Med. 2016;151:225–232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Current and future demand for specialist disability services. Canberra: AIHW; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Bridge C, Flatau P, Whelan S, et al. Housing assistance and non- shelter outcomes. AHURI. 2003;40:1–84.
   Google Scholar
• Connellan J. Commentary on Housing for People with Intellectual Disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme Reforms (Wiesel, 2015). Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2(1):56–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Housing for people with intellectual disabilities and the National Disability Insurance Scheme reforms. Res Pract Intellect Dev Disabil. 2015;2(1):45–55.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• HM Government. Hate crime – the cross-government action plan. London: Home Office; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Department of Health. Transforming care: a National response to Winterbourne View Hospital. London: Department of Health and Social Care; 2012. (Report No. 18348).
   Google Scholar
• UN General Assembly. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities: resolution adopted by the General Assembly, A/RES/61/106; 2007 [cited 2020 May]. Available from: http://www.unhcr.org/refworld/docid/45f973632.htm
   Google Scholar
• International Foundation for Electoral Systems. International language guidelines on disability. Arlington (VA): International Foundation for Electoral Systems; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. International classification of functioning, disability and health (ICF). Geneva: World Health Organization; 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Rosengard A, Laing I, Ridley J, et al. A literature review on multiple and complex needs. Edinburgh: Scottish Executive; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Rankin J, Regan S. Meeting complex needs in social care. Hous Care Support. 2004;7(3):4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. Disability support services: services provided under the National Disability Agreement 2012–13. Canberra: AIHW; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Beadle-Brown J, Mansell J, Kozma A. Deinstitutionalization in intellectual disabilities. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2007;20(5):437–442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Keogh F. Disability and mental health in Ireland: searching out good practice Ireland. Mullingar, Ireland: Genio; 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Mansell J, Beadle-Brown J, Bigby C. Implementation of active support in Victoria, Australia: an exploratory study. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;38(1):48–58.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Productivity Commission. Disability Care and Support, Productivity Commission Inquiry: Report. Canberra: Australian Government; 2009. (Report no. 54).
   Google Scholar
• Wiesel I. Allocating homes for people with intellectual disability: needs, mix and choice. Soc Policy Admin. 2011;45(3):280–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Balandin SU. Witnessing without words. Intellectual disability & the law: contemporary Australian issues. Aus Soc Stud Intellect Disabil. 2000;1:31–40.
   Google Scholar
• Carr S. Enabling risk, ensuring safety: Self-directed support and personal budgets. London (UK): SCIE; 2013. (Report no. 36)
   Google Scholar
• Disability Services Commissioner Victoria. Learning from Complaints Occasional Paper No. 2, Developing policy principles and strategies to support families of adults with a disability and disability service providers to work more effectively together. Melbourne: State Government of Victoria; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• Marsland D, Oakes P, Bright N. It can still happen here: systemic risk factors that may contribute to the continued abuse of people with intellectual disabilities. Tizard Learning Disability Rev. 2015;20(3):134–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marsland D, Oakes P, White C. Early Indicators of Concern in Residential Support Services for People with Learning Disabilities. The Abuse in Care? Project. Hull (UK): Centre for Applied Research and Evaluation: October; 2012.
   Google Scholar
• Taleporos G, Craig D, Brown M. Housing and support for younger people with disabilities transitioning to independent living: Elements for success in the design and implementation of disability care Australia, a National Disability Insurance Scheme. Melbourne (VIC): Youth Disability Advocacy Service; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Douglas J, Bigby C. Development of an evidence-based practice framework to guide decision making support for people with cognitive impairment due to acquired brain injury or intellectual disability. Disabil Rehabil. 2020;42(3):434–441.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller SM, Chan F. Predictors of life satisfaction in individuals with intellectual disabilities. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2008;52(12):1039–1047.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Howe J, Horner RH, Newton JS. Comparison of supported living and traditional residential services in the state of Oregon. Ment Retard. 1998;36(1):1–11.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stancliffe RJ. Community living-unit size, staff presence, and residents' choice-making. Ment Retard. 1997;35(1):1–9.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lord J, Hutchison P. Individualised support and funding: building blocks for capacity building and inclusion. Disabil Soc. 2003;18(1):71–86.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tøssebro J. Scandinavian disability policy: From deinstitutionalisation to non-discrimination and beyond. Alter. 2016;10(2):111–123.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Disability Insurance Scheme Act. Canberra: Parliament of Australian; 2013. (No. 20).
   Google Scholar
• Arksey H, O'Malley L. Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. Int J Soc Res Methodol. 2005;8(1):19–32.
   Google Scholar
• Levac D, Colquhoun H, O'Brien KK. Scoping studies: advancing the methodology. Implement Sci. 2010;5(1):69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tricco AC, Lillie E, Zarin W, et al. PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Ann Intern Med. 2018;169(7):467–473.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Davis DL, Fox-Grage W, Gehshan S. Deinstitutionalization of persons with developmental disabilities: a technical assistance report for legislators. Denver: National Conference of State Legislatures; 2004.
   Google Scholar
• Bostock L, Gleeson B, McPherson A, et al. Deinstitutionalisation and housing futures: Positioning paper. Melbourne: University of New South Wales and University of Western Sydney Research Centre, Australian Housing and Research Institute; 2000.
   Google Scholar
• Emerson E. Deinstitutionalisation in England. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2004;29(1):79–84.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Bould E, Beadle-Brown J. Comparing costs and outcomes of supported living with group homes in Australia. J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2018;43(3):295–307.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cocks E, Thoresen SH, O'Brien P, et al. Examples of individual supported living for adults with intellectual disability. J Intellect Disabil. 2016;20(2):100–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Emerson E, Robertson J, Gregory N, et al. Quality and costs of supported living residences and group homes in the United Kingdom. Am J Mental Retard. 2001;106(5):401–415.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Emerson E, McVilly K. Friendship activities of adults with intellectual disabilities in supported accommodation in Northern England. J Appl Res Int Dis. 2004;17(3):191–197.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Felce D, Perry J, Kerr M. A comparison of activity levels among adults with intellectual disabilities living in family homes and out‐of‐family placements. J Appl Res Intellect Disabil. 2011;24(5):421–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman C. The influence of residence type on personal outcomes. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2019;57(2):112–126.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gardner JF, Carran DT. Attainment of personal outcomes by people with developmental disabilities. Ment Retard. 2005;43(3):157–174.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ho PS, Kroll T, Kehn M, et al. Health and housing among low- income adults with physical disabilities. J Health Care Poor Underserved. 2007;18(4):902–915.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houseworth J, Stancliffe RJ, Tichá R. Association of state-level and individual-level factors with choice making of individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Res Dev Disabil. 2018;83:77–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marlow E, Walker N. Does supported living work for people with severe intellectual disabilities? Adv Mental Hlth Intell Disabil. 2015;9(6):338–351.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McColl MA, Davies D, Carlson P, et al. Transitions to independent living after ABI. Brain Inj. 1999;13(5):311–330.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey R, Keogh F, Bunting B, et al. Relocating people with intellectual disability to new accommodation and support settings: Contrasts between personalized arrangements and group home placements. J Intellect Disabil. 2016;20(2):109–120.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey R, Keogh F, Bunting B, et al. Changes in the self-rated well-being of people who move from congregated settings to personalized arrangements and group home placements. J Intellect Disabil. 2018;22(1):49–60.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McConkey R, Bunting B, Keogh F, et al. The impact on social relationships of moving from congregated settings to personalized accommodation. J Intellect Disabil. 2019;23(2):149–159.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saloviita T, Åberg M. Self-determination in hospital, community group homes, and apartments. Br J Dev Disabil. 2000;46(90):23–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheth AJ, McDonald KE, Fogg J, et al Satisfaction, safety, and supports: Comparing people with disabilities' insider experiences about participation in institutional and community living. Disabil Health J. 2019;12(4):712–717.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stainton T, Brown J, Crawford C, et al. Comparison of community residential supports on measures of information & planning; access to & delivery of supports; choice & control; community connections; satisfaction; and, overall perception of outcomes. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011;55(8):732–745.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stancliffe RJ, Keane S. Outcomes and costs of community living: a matched comparison of group homes and semi-independent living. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2000;25(4):281–305.
   Google Scholar
• Tichá R, Lakin KC, Larson SA, et al. Correlates of everyday choice and support-related choice for 8,892 randomly sampled adults with intellectual and developmental disabilities in 19 states. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2012;50(6):486–504.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valk-Kleibeuker L, Heijenbrok-Kal MH, Ribbers GM. Mood after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury: a prospective cohort study. PloS One. 2014;9(2):e87414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Bolding N. Self-determination across living and working environments: a matched-samples study of adults with mental retardation. Ment Retard. 1999;37(5):353–363.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Wehmeyer ML, Bolding N. Enhanced self-determination of adults with intellectual disability as an outcome of moving to community-based work or living environments. J Intellect Disabil Res. 2001;45(Pt 5):371–383.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, PRISMA Group, et al. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151(4):264–269.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma A, Mansell J, Beadle-Brown J. Outcomes in different residential settings for people with intellectual disability: a systematic review. Am J Intellect Dev Disabil. 2009;114(3):193–222.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Lakin KC, Stancliffe RJ. Residential supports for persons with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Ment Retard Dev Disabil Res Rev. 2007;13(2):151–159.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Felce D, Perry J, Romeo R, et al. Outcomes and costs of community living: semi-independent living and fully staffed group homes. Am J Ment Retard. 2008;113(2):87–101.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Stancliffe RJ, Lakin KC. Analysis of expenditures and outcomes of residential alternatives for persons with developmental disabilities. Am J Mental Retard. 1997;102(6):552–568.
   Google Scholar
• Wright CJ, Colley J, Kendall E. Exploring the efficacy of housing alternatives for adults with an acquired brain or spinal injury: a systematic review. Brain Impair. 2019 [cited 2020 Jun 26]. DOI:https://doi.org/10.1017/BrImp.2019.33
   Google Scholar
• Bigby C, Douglas J, Bould E. Developing and maintaining person centred active support: a demonstration project in supported accommodation for people with neurotrauma [Internet]. Melbourne: La Trobe Living with Disability Research Centre. 2018.
   Google Scholar
• Ylvisaker M, Jacobs HE, Feeney T. Positive supports for people who experience behavioral and cognitive disability after brain injury: a review. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2003;18(1):7–32.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fakhoury WK, Murray A, Shepherd G, et al. Research in supported housing. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2002;37(7):301–315.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tabol C, Drebing C, Rosenheck R. Studies of “supported” and “supportive” housing: a comprehensive review of model descriptions and measurement. Eval Program Plann. 2010;33(4):446–456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins R, Kim Y. The use and abuse of ‘community’ and ‘neighbourhood’ within disability research: an exposé, clarification, and recommendation. Int J Dev Disabil. 2015;61(2):68–75.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tassé MJ, Luckasson R, Nygren M. AAIDD proposed recommendations for ICD-11 and the condition previously known as mental retardation. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2013;51(2):127–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jones MK. Disability, employment and earnings: an examination of heterogeneity. Appl Econ. 2011;43(8):1001–1017.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams MH, Bowie C. Evidence of unmet need in the care of severely physically disabled adults. BMJ. 1993;306(6870):95–98.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sloan S, Callaway L, Winkler D, et al. Accommodation outcomes and transitions following community-based intervention for individuals with acquired brain injury. Brain Impair. 2012;13(1):24–43.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beer A, Flanagan K, Verdouw J, et al. Understanding Specialist Disability Accommodation funding. Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute (AHURI); 2019. (Final Report No. 310).
   Google Scholar