Effectiveness and characteristics of interventions to improve work participation in adults with chronic physical conditions: a systematic review

References

• Busse R, Blümel M, Scheller-Kreinsen D, et al. Tackling chronic disease in Europe. Strategies, interventions and challenges. World Health Organization (WHO). The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Nolte E, McKee M. Caring for people with chronic conditions. A health system perspective. Maidenhead: World Health Organisation (WHO). The European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Detaille SI, Heerkens YF, Engels JA, et al. Common prognostic factors of work disability among employees with a chronic somatic disease: a systematic review of cohort studies. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2009;35(4):261–281.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heijmans M, van der Veer J, Spreeuwenberg P, et al. Core data on employment and income 2011 (Dutch: Kerngegevens werk en inkomen Rapportage 2011). Utrecht: Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research (NIVEL); 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Boot CR, Koppes LL, van den Bossche SN, et al. Relation between perceived health and sick leave in employees with a chronic illness. J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21(2):211–219.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baanders AN, Rijken PM, Peters L. Labour participation of the chronically ill. A profile sketch. Eur J Public Health. 2002;12(2):124–130.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meulenkamp TM, Cardol M, van der Hoek LS, et al. Participation of people with physical disabilities: three-year trend and potential for improvement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013;94(5):944–950.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varekamp I, van Dijk FJ. Workplace problems and solutions for employees with chronic diseases. Occup Med (Lond). 2010;60(4):287–293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rijken M, Spreeuwenberg P, Schippers J, et al. The importance of illness duration, age at diagnosis and the year of diagnosis for labour participation chances of people with chronic illness: results of a nationwide panel-study in The Netherlands. BMC Public Health. 2013;13:803.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vooijs M, Leensen MC, Hoving JL, et al. Disease-generic factors of work participation of workers with a chronic disease: a systematic review. Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2015;88(8):1015–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Apeldoorn AT, Chiarotto A, et al. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation for chronic low back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(9):CD000963.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaafsma FG, Whelan K, van der Beek AJ, et al. Physical conditioning as part of a return to work strategy to reduce sickness absence for workers with back pain. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013;(8):CD001822.
   Google Scholar
• Norlund A, Ropponen A, Alexanderson K. Multidisciplinary interventions: review of studies of return to work after rehabilitation for low back pain. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(3):115–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ravenek MJ, Hughes ID, Ivanovich N, et al. A systematic review of multidisciplinary outcomes in the management of chronic low back pain. Work. 2010;35(3):349–367.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Grant MJ, Booth A. A typology of reviews: an analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Info Libr J. 2009;26(2):91–108.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Croon EM, Sluiter JK, Nijssen TF, et al. Predictive factors of work disability in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review. Ann Rheum Dis. 2004;63(11):1362–1367.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haafkens J, Moerman C, Schuring M, et al. Searching bibliographic databases for literature on chronic disease and work participation. Occup Med (Lond). 2006;56(1):39–45.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higgins JPT, Green SE. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011 [cited 2020 Jun 30]. Available from: http:/www.cochrane-handbook.org
   Google Scholar
• Armijo-Olivo S, Stiles CR, Hagen NA, et al. Assessment of study quality for systematic reviews: a comparison of the Cochrane Collaboration Risk of Bias Tool and the Effective Public Health Practice Project Quality Assessment Tool: methodological research. J Eval Clin Pract. 2012;18(1):12–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• The Nordic Cochrane Centre. Review Manager (RevMan). [Computer program]. Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence-inconsistency. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1294–1302.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hutting N, Staal JB, Engels JA, et al. Nijhuis-van der Sanden MW. Effect evaluation of a self-management programme for employees with complaints of the arm, neck or shoulder: a randomised controlled trial. Occup Environ Med. 2015;72(12):852–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Martin DJ, Chernoff RA, Buitron M, et al. Helping people with HIV/AIDS return to work: a randomized clinical trial. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(4):280–289.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillsdale (NJ): Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1988.
   Google Scholar
• Guyatt G, Oxman AD, Akl EA, et al. GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction-GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(4):383–394.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, et al. GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence-imprecision. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1283–1293.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Kunz R, GRADE Working Group, et al. GRADE guidelines: rating the quality of evidence-indirectness. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1303–1310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brożek JL, Akl EA, Compalati E, GRADE Working Group, et al. Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations in clinical practice guidelines part 3 of 3. The GRADE approach to developing recommendations. Allergy. 2011;66(5):588–595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Montori V, et al. GRADE guidelines: 5. Rating the quality of evidence-publication bias. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64(12):1277–1282.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allaire SH, Li W, LaValley MP. Reduction of job loss in persons with rheumatic diseases receiving vocational rehabilitation: a randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48(11):3212–3218.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anderson B, Strand LI, Raheim M. The effect of long-term body awareness training succeeding a multimodal cognitive behavior program for patients with widespread pain. J Musculoskel Pain. 2007;15(3):19–29.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brattberg G. Internet-based rehabilitation for individuals with chronic pain and burnout: a randomized trial. Int J Rehabil Res. 2006;29(3):221–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheng ASK, Hung LK. Randomized controlled trial of workplace-based rehabilitation for work-related rotator cuff disorder. J Occup Rehabil. 2007;17(3):487–503.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Buck PD, Le Cessie S, van den Hout WB, et al. Randomized comparison of a multidisciplinary job-retention vocational rehabilitation program with usual outpatient care in patients with chronic arthritis at risk for job loss. Arthritis Rheum. 2005;53(5):682–690.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Detaille S, Heerkens Y, Engels J, et al. Effect evaluation of a self-management program for Dutch workers with a chronic somatic disease: a randomized controlled trial. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(2):189–199.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feuerstein M, Callan-Harris S, Hickey P, et al. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation of chronic work-related upper extremity disorders. Long-term effects. J Occup Med. 1993;35(4):396–403.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Haffey W, Abrams D. Employment outcomes for participants in a brain injury work reentry program: preliminary findings. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 1991;6(3):24–34.
   Google Scholar
• Ipsen C, Ravesloot C, Arnold N, et al. Working well with a disability: health promotion as a means to employment. Rehabil Psychol. 2012;57(3):187–195.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendall NAS, Thompson BF. A pilot program for dealing with the comorbidity of chronic pain and long-term unemployment. J Occup Rehabil. 1998;8(1):5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li EJ, Li-Tsang CW, Lam CS, et al. The effect of a training on work readiness program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study. J Occup Rehabil. 2006;16(4):529–541.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li-Tsang CWP, Li EJQ, Lam CS, et al. The effect of a job placement and support program for workers with musculoskeletal injuries: a randomized control trial (RCT) study. J Occup Rehabil. 2008;18(3):299–306.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macedo AM, Oakley SP, Panayi GS, et al. Functional and work outcomes improve in patients with rheumatoid arthritis who receive targeted, comprehensive occupational therapy. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61(11):1522–1530.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Marhold C, Linton SJ, Melin L. A cognitive-behavioral return-to-work program: effects on pain patients with a history of long-term versus short-term sick leave. Pain. 2001;91(1–2):155–163.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marnetoft SU, Selander J. Multidisciplinary vocational rehabilitation focusing on work training and case management for unemployed sick-listed people. Int J Rehabil Res. 2000;23(4):271–279.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Niemeier JP, Degrace SM, Farrar LF, et al. Effectiveness of a comprehensive, manualized intervention for improving productivity and employability following brain injury. J Vocat Rehabil. 2010;33(3):167–179.
   Google Scholar
• Ntsiea MV, Van Aswegen H, Lord S, et al. The effect of a workplace intervention programme on return to work after stroke: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(7):663–673.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ottomanelli L, Goetz LL, Suris A, et al. Effectiveness of supported employment for veterans with spinal cord injuries: results from a randomized multisite study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93(5):740–747.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salazar AM, Warden DL, Schwab K, et al. Cognitive rehabilitation for traumatic brain injury: a randomized trial. Defense and Veterans Head Injury Program (DVHIP) Study Group. J Am Med Assoc. 2000;283(23):3075–3081.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skouen JS, Grasdal A, Haldorsen EM. Return to work after comparing outpatient multidisciplinary treatment programs versus treatment in general practice for patients with chronic widespread pain. Eur J Pain. 2006;10(2):145–152.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sullivan MJ, Adams H, Rhodenizer T, et al. A psychosocial risk factor-targeted intervention for the prevention of chronic pain and disability following whiplash injury. Phys Ther. 2006;86(1):8–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trexler LE, Parrott DR, Malec JF. Replication of a prospective randomized controlled trial of resource facilitation to improve return to work and school after brain injury. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016;97(2):204–210.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Varekamp I, Verbeek JH, de Boer A, et al. Effect of job maintenance training program for employees with chronic disease – a randomized controlled trial on self-efficacy, job satisfaction, and fatigue. Scand J Work Environ Health. 2011;37(4):288–297.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Vilsteren M, Boot CR, Twisk JW, et al. Effectiveness of an integrated care intervention on supervisor support and work functioning of workers with rheumatoid arthritis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(4):354–359.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer K, Fransen J, Huwiler H, et al. Feasibility and results of a randomised pilot-study of a work rehabilitation programme. BMR. 2005;18(3-4):67–78.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond A, O'Brien R, Woodbridge S, et al. Job retention vocational rehabilitation for employed people with inflammatory arthritis (WORK-IA): a feasibility randomized controlled trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2017;18(1):315.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Keysor JJ, LaValley MP, Brown C, et al. Efficacy of a work disability prevention program for people with rheumatic and musculoskeletal conditions: a single-blind parallel-arm randomized controlled trial. Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2018;70(7):1022–1029.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorstyn D, Roberts R, Murphy G, et al. Work and SCI: a pilot randomized controlled study of an online resource for job-seekers with spinal cord dysfunction. Spinal Cord. 2019;57(3):221–228.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Ridder D, Geenen R, Kuijer R, et al. Psychological adjustment to chronic disease. Lancet. 2008;372(9634):246–255.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nieuwenhuijsen K, Faber B, Verbeek JH, et al. Interventions to improve return to work in depressed people. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;(12):CD006237.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suijkerbuijk YB, Schaafsma FG, van Mechelen JC, et al. Interventions for obtaining and maintaining employment in adults with severe mental illness, a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017;(9):CD011867.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Anema JR, Schellart AJ, Cassidy JD, et al. Can cross country differences in return-to-work after chronic occupational back pain be explained? An exploratory analysis on disability policies in a six country cohort study. J Occup Rehabil. 2009;19(4):419–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffmann TC, Glasziou PP, Boutron I, et al. Better reporting of interventions: template for intervention description and replication (TIDieR) checklist and guide. BMJ. 2014;348:g1687.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar