Practicing in a person-centred environment – self-help groups in psycho-social rehabilitation

References

• Wang H, Naghavi M, Allen C, et al. Global, regional, and national incidence, prevalence, and years lived with disability for 310 diseases and injuries, 1990–2015: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2015. The Lancet. 2016;388(10053):1545–1602.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yach D, Hawkes C, Gould CL, et al. The global burden of chronic diseases: overcoming impediments to prevention and control. JAMA. 2004;291(21):2616–2622.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebohm P, Munn-Giddings C, Brewer P. What’s in a name? A discussion paper on the labels and location of self-organising community groups, with particular reference to mental health and Black groups. Mental Health Social Inclusion. 2010;14(3):23–29.
   Google Scholar
• Boyce M. It’s a safe space”: the role of self-harm self-help/mutual aid groups [Monography]. Chelmsford: Anglia Ruskin University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Karlsson M. Självhjälpsgrupper – teori och praktik [Self-Help Groups – theory and practice]. Lund: Studentlitteratur; 2006.
   Google Scholar
• Pistrang N, Barker C, Humphreys K. Mutual help groups for mental health problems: a review of effectiveness studies. Am J Community Psychol. 2008;42(1–2):110–121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seebohm P, Chaudhary S, Boyce M, et al. The contribution of self-help/mutual aid groups to mental well-being. Health Soc Care Community. 2013;21(4):391–401.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borkman T. Understanding self-help/mutual aid: experiential learning in the commons. New Brunswick, N.J.: Rutgers University Press; 1999.
   Google Scholar
• Munn-Giddings C, Borkman T. Reciprocity in peer-led mutual aid groups in the community: implications for social policy and social work practices. In: Törrönen L, M., Munn-Giddings C, Tarkiainen L, editors. Reciprocal Relationships: implications for social work and social policy. Oxon, UK: Taylor & Francis; 2018. p. 59–77.
   Google Scholar
• Aglen BS, Hedlund M, Landstad BJ. Self-help and self-help groups for people with long-lasting health problems or mental health difficulties in a Nordic context: a review. Scand J Public Health. 2011;39(8):813–822.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barlow SH, Burlingame GM, Nebeker RS, et al. Meta-analysis of medical self-help groups. Int J Group Psychother. 2000;50(1):53–69.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffiths C, Foster G, Ramsay J, et al. How effective are expert patient (lay led) education programmes for chronic disease? BMJ. 2007;334(7606):1254–1256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uccelli MM, Mohr LM, Battaglia MA, et al. Peer support groups in multiple sclerosis: current effectiveness and future directions. Mult Scler. 2004;10(1):80–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Laitinen I, Ettorre E, Sutton C. Empowering depressed women: changes in ‘individual’ and ‘social’ feelings in guided self-help groups in Finland. Eur J Psychother Counsell. 2006;8(3):305–320.
   Google Scholar
• Lucksted A, McNulty K, Brayboy L, et al. Initial evaluation of the peer-to-peer program. Psychiatr Serv. 2009;60(2):250–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Segal SP, Silverman CJ, Temkin TL. Self-help and community mental health agency outcomes: a recovery-focused randomized controlled trial. Psychiat Serv. 2010;61(9):905–910.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang I, Mittelmark MB. Learning as an empowerment process in breast cancer self-help groups. J Clin Nurs. 2009;18(14):2049–2057.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stang I, Mittelmark MB. Intervention to enhance empowerment in breast cancer self-help groups. Nurs Inq. 2010;17(1):47–57.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ussher J, Kirsten L, Butow P, et al. What do cancer support groups provide which other supportive relationships do not? The experience of peer support groups for people with cancer. Soc Sci Med. 2006;62(10):2565–2576.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kurtz LF. Self-help and support groups: a handbook for practitioners. London: Sage; 1997.
   Google Scholar
• Schubert MA, Borkman TJ. An organizational typology for self-help groups. Am J Community Psychol. 1991;19(5):769–787.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandaunet AG. The challenge of fitting in: non-participation and withdrawal from an online self-help group for breast cancer patients. Sociol Health Illn. 2008;30(1):131–144.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burns D, Taylor M. Mutual aid and self-help: coping strategies for excluded communities. Bristol: Policy Press; 1998.
   Google Scholar
• Avis M, Elkan R, Patel S, et al. Ethnicity and participation in cancer self-help groups. Psychooncology. 2008;17(9):940–947.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• King SA, Moreggi D. Internet self-help and support groups-chapter 9: the pros and cons of text-based mutual aid. Amsterdam: Elsevier Inc.; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Kelleher D. Self-help groups and their relationship to medicine. In: Challenging medicine [Internet]. 2nd ed. London: Routledge; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Phinney A, Kelson E, Baumbusch J, et al. Walking in the neighbourhood: performing social citizenship in dementia. Dementia (London). 2016;15(3):381–394.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Laakkonen ML, Kautiainen H, Hölttä E, et al. Effects of self-management groups for people with dementia and their spouses-randomized controlled trial. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2016;64(4):752–760.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waxmonsky J, Kilbourne AM, Goodrich DE, et al. Enhanced fidelity to treatment for bipolar disorder: results from a randomized controlled implementation trial. Psychiatr Serv. 2014;65(1):81–90.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shah R, Hunt J, Webb TL, et al. Starting to develop self-help for social anxiety associated with vitiligo: using clinical significance to measure the potential effectiveness of enhanced psychological self-help. Br J Dermatol. 2014;171(2):332–337.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mejias NJ, Gill CJ, Shpigelman C-N. Influence of a support group for young women with disabilities on sense of belonging. J Couns Psychol. 2014;61(2):208–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Box M, Shawe J. The experiences of adults with learning disabilities attending a sexuality and relationship group: “I want to get married and have kids.” J Fam Plann Reprod Health Care. 2014;40(2):82–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Mancini M, Linhorst D, Menditto A, et al. Statewide implementation of recovery support groups for people with serious mental illness: a multidimensional evaluation. J Behav Health Serv Res. 2013;40(4):391–403.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wakefield JRH, Bickley S, Sani F. The effects of identification with a support group on the mental health of people with multiple sclerosis. J Psychosom Res. 2013;74(5):420–426.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Panke-Kochinke B. Eine Analyse der individuellen Wahrnehmungs- und Bewaltigungsstrategien von Menschen mit Demenz im Fruhstadium ihrer Erkrankung unter Beachtung der Funktion und Wirksamkeit von Selbsthilfegruppen auf der Grundlage von Selbstauserungen. Pflege Die Wissenschaftliche Zeitschrift Fuer Pflegeberufe. 2013;26(6):387–400.
   Google Scholar
• Beehler S, Clark JA, Eisen SV. Participant experiences in peer- and clinician-facilitated mental health recovery groups for veterans. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2014;37(1):43–50.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. Convention on the rights of persons with disabilities (CRPD) No. 44910. New York: United Nation Treaty Collection; 2006; [cited 2020 June 30]. Available from: https://treaties.un.org/Pages/ViewDetails.aspx?src=TREATY&mtdsg_no=IV-15&chapter=4&lang=_en&clang=_en.
   Google Scholar
• Hedlund M, Landstad B. The construction of self-help in Norwegian health policy. Int J Self-Help Self-Care. 2012;6(1):65–87.
   Google Scholar
• Patton MQ. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. 3rd ed., Saint Paul (MN): SAGE; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Krueger RA, Casey MA. Focus groups: a practical guide for applied research. 5th ed. Los Angeles: Sage. 2015.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st century: applications for advancing social justice studies. 3rd ed. Los Angeles: University of California; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Corbin JM, Strauss AL. Basics of qualitative research: techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory. 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks, Calif: Sage; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Crabtree, BF, Miller WL (Eds.). Doing qualitative research: multiple strategies. Newbury Park, CA: Sage. 1992.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory in the 21st centry: appplications for advancing social justice studies. In N. K. Denzin & Y.S. Lincoln (Eds.). The SAGE handbook of qualitative research, 3rd ed. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage; 2005. p. 507–535.
   Google Scholar
• Charmaz K. Grounded theory: objectivist and constructivist methods. In N.K. Denzin & Y.S.  (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research. 2nd ed; 2000. pp. 509–535.
   Google Scholar
• HarryB SKM, Klingner JK. Mapping the process: an exemplar of process and challenge in grounded theory analysis. Educ Res. 2005;34(2):3–13.
   Google Scholar
• Lov om medisinsk og helsefaglig forskning (helseforskningsloven)[Act about medicine and health research], 44 2009.
   Google Scholar
• Wade D. Rehabilitation – a new approach. Part two: the underlying theories. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(12):1145–1154.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins R. Interaction ritual chains. Princeton (N.J.): Princeton University Press; 2004. (Princeton studies in cultural sociology).
   Google Scholar