232
Views
1
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Assessment Procedures

Finnish translation and external validation of the Trauma Quality of Life questionnaire

, , , & ORCID Icon
Pages 1129-1135 | Received 26 Nov 2019, Accepted 14 Jul 2020, Published online: 28 Jul 2020

References

  • Kaske S, Lefering R, Trentzsch H, et al. Quality of life two years after severe trauma: a single-centre evaluation. Injury. 2014;45(Suppl. 3):S100–S105.
  • Borg T, Berg P, Fugl-Meyer K, et al. Health-related quality of life and life satisfaction in patients following surgically treated pelvic ring fractures. A prospective observational study with two years follow-up. Injury. 2010;41(4):400–404.
  • Harvey-Kelly KF, Kanakaris NK, Obakponovwe O, et al. Quality of life and sexual function after traumatic pelvic fracture. J Orthop Trauma. 2014;28:28–35.
  • Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, et al. Outcome after major trauma: discharge and 6-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1998;45:31–34.
  • Gabbe BJ, Cameron PA, Hannaford AP, et al. Routine follow up of major trauma patients from trauma registries: what are the outcomes? J Trauma. 2006;61(6):1393–1399.
  • Gabbe BJ, Simpson PM, Harrison JE, et al. Return to work and functional outcomes after major trauma: who recovers, when, and how well? Ann Surg. 2016;263(4):623–632.
  • Holbrook TL, Anderson JP, Sieber WJ, et al. Outcome after major trauma: 12-month and 18-month follow-up results from the Trauma Recovery Project. J Trauma. 1999;46:76–73.
  • Ulvik A, Kvale R, Wentzel-Larsen T, et al. Quality of life 2–7 years after major trauma. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2008;52(2):195–201.
  • Gabbe BJ, Simpson PM, Cameron PA, et al. Long-term health status and trajectories of seriously injured patients: a population-based longitudinal study. PLoS Med. 2017;14(7):e1002322.
  • Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C, et al. Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The Upper Extremity Collaborative Group (UECG). Am J Ind Med. 1996;29(6):602–608.
  • von Steinbuchel N, Wilson L, Gibbons H, et al. Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI): scale development and metric properties. J Neurotrauma. 2010;27(7):1167–1185.
  • von Steinbuechel N, Covic A, Polinder S, et al. Assessment of health-related quality of life after TBI: comparison of a disease-specific (QOLIBRI) with a generic (SF-36) instrument. Behav Neurol. 2016;2016:7928014.
  • Gay RE, Amadio PC, Johnson JC. Comparative responsiveness of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder, and hand, the carpal tunnel questionnaire, and the SF-36 to clinical change after carpal tunnel release. J Hand Surg Am. 2003;28(2):250–254.
  • Michel YA, Engel L, Rand-Hendriksen K, et al. "When I saw walking I just kind of took it as wheeling": interpretations of mobility-related items in generic, preference-based health state instruments in the context of spinal cord injury. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2016;14(1):164.
  • Wanner JP, deRoon-Cassini T, Kodadek L, et al. Development of a trauma-specific quality-of-life measurement. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2015;79:275–281.
  • Harri S. The 15D-measure of health-related quality of life. I. Reliability, validity and sensitivity of its health state descriptive system. National Centre for Health Program Evaluation, Working Paper 41, Melbourne 1994; 2017.
  • Kaukola L, Snall J, Roine R, et al. Health-related quality of life of patients with zygomatic fracture. Med Oral. 2017;22:e636–e642.
  • Repo JP, Barner-Rasmussen I, Roine RP, et al. Treatment of compound tibia fracture with microvascular latissimus dorsi flap and the Ilizarov technique: a cross-sectional study of long-term outcomes. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2016;69(4):524–532.
  • Dahlberg A, Alaranta H, Sintonen H. Health-related quality of life in persons with traumatic spinal cord lesion in Helsinki. J Rehabil Med. 2005;37(5):312–316.
  • Alanne S, Roine RP, Rasanen P, et al. Estimating the minimum important change in the 15D scores. Qual Life Res. 2015;24(3):599–606.
  • Koskinen S, Lundqvist A, Ristiluoma N, et al. Health, functional capacity and welfare in Finland in 2011. National Institute for Health and Welfare (THL), Report 68/2012. Helsinki; 2012.
  • Hinkle DE, Wiersma W, Jurs SG. Applied statistics for the behavioral sciences. 5th ed. Boston (MA): Houghton Mifflin; 2003.
  • Wild D, Grove A, Martin M, et al. Principles of good practice for the translation and cultural adaptation process for patient-reported outcomes (PRO) measures: report of the ISPOR Task Force for Translation and Cultural Adaptation. Value Health. 2005;8(2):94–104.
  • Rombach I, Rivero-Arias O, Gray AM, et al. The current practice of handling and reporting missing outcome data in eight widely used PROMs in RCT publications: a review of the current literature. Qual Life Res. 2016;25(7):1613–1623.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.