In search of Kipling’s six honest serving men in upper limb rehabilitation: within participant case-crossover experiment nested within a web-based questionnaire

References

• Jolliffe L, Lannin NA, Cadilhac DA, et al. Systematic review of clinical practice guidelines to identify recommendations for rehabilitation after stroke and other acquired brain injuries. BMJ Open. 2018;8(2):e018791.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kipling R. I keep six honest serving men. Available from: http://www.kiplingsociety.co.uk/poems_serving.htm
   Google Scholar
• Schneider EJ, Lannin NA, Ada L, et al. Increasing the amount of usual rehabilitation improves activity after stroke: a systematic review. J Physiother. 2016;62(4):182–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyd LA, Hayward KS, Ward NS, et al. Biomarkers of stroke recovery: consensus-based core recommendations from the Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable (SRRR). Int J Stroke. 2017;12(5):480–493.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt J, Hayward KS, Dancause N, et al. A stroke recovery trial development framework: Consensus-based core recommendations from the Second Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation Roundtable. Int J Stroke. 2019;14(8):792–802.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ha J, Churilov L, Linden T, et al. Bed rest or mobilization after rt-PA? A case-crossover study of factors influencing clinical decision-making in stroke services. Int J Stroke. 2013;8(3):172–179.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Utley M, Gallivan S, Mills M, et al. A consensus process for identifying a prioritised list of study questions. Health Care Manag Sci. 2007;10(1):105–110.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• National Stroke Foundation. Clinical guidelines for stroke management. 2017. https://informme.org.au/Guidelines
   Google Scholar
• Duncan PW, Goldstein LB, Matchar D, et al. Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke. 1992;23(8):1084–1089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hubbard IJ, Parsons MW, Neilson C, et al. Task-specific training: evidence for and translation to clinical practice. Occup Ther Int. 2009;16(3–4):175–189.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS). A single-center RCT. Neurology. 2009;73(3):195–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dromerick AW, Edwardson MA, Edwards DF, et al. Critical periods after stroke study: translating animal stroke recovery experiments into a clinical trial. Front Hum Neurosci. 2015;9:231.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lohse KR, Lang CE, Boyd LA. Is more better? Using metadata to explore dose-response relationships in stroke rehabilitation. Stroke. 2014;45(7):2053–2058.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Winters C, van Wegen EE, et al. Effects of unilateral upper limb training in two distinct prognostic groups early after stroke: the EXPLICIT-stroke randomized clinical trial. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2016;30(9):804–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winstein CJ, Wolf SL, Dromerick AW, et al. Effect of a task-oriented rehabilitation program on upper extremity recovery following motor stroke: the ICARE randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2016;315(6):571–581.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han C, Wang Q, Meng PP, et al. Effects of intensity of arm training on hemiplegic upper extremity motor recovery in stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2013;27(1):75–81.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Abdullahi A. Effects of number of repetitions and number of hours of shaping practice during constraint-induced movement therapy: a randomized controlled trial. Neurol Res Int. 2018;2018:5496408.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Brauer SG. Dose of arm activity training during acute and subacute rehabilitation post stroke: a systematic review of the literature. Clin Rehabil. 2015;29(12):1234–1243.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dalton EJ, Churilov L, Lannin NA, et al. Dose articulation in preclinical and clinical stroke recovery: refining a discovery research pipeline and presenting a scoping review protocol. Front Neurol. 2019;10:1148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wolf SL, Kwakkel G, Bayley M, et al. Best practice for arm recovery post stroke: an international application. Physiotherapy. 2016;102(1):1–4.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McDonnell MN, Hillier S, Esterman A. Standardising the approach to evidence-based upper limb rehabilitation after stroke. Topics Stroke Rehabil. 2013;20(5):432–440.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copley J, Kuipers K. Neurorehabilitation of the upper limb across the lifespan: Managing hypertonicity for optimal function. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2014.
   Google Scholar
• French B, Thomas LH, Coupe J, et al. Repetitive task training for improving functional ability after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016;(11):CD006073.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corbetta D, Sirtori V, Moja L, et al. Constraint-induced movement therapy in stroke patients: systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Phys Rehabil Med. 2010;46(4):537–544.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mehrholz J, Hadrich A, Platz T, et al. Electromechanical and robot-assisted arm training for improving generic activities of daily living, arm function and arm muscle strength after stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(6):CD006876.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winter J, Hunter S, Sim J, et al. Hands-on therapy interventions for upper limb motor dysfunction following stroke. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011;(6):CD006609.
   Google Scholar
• Jolliffe L, Morarty J, Hoffmann T, et al. Using audit and feedback to increase clinician adherence to clinical practice guidelines in brain injury rehabilitation: a before and after study. PLoS One. 2019;14(3):e0213525.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armstrong MJ. Shared decision-making in stroke: an evolving approach to improved patient care. Stroke Vasc Neurol. 2017;2(2):84–87.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Carr JH, Shepherd RB, Nordholm L, et al. Investigation of a new motor assessment scale for stroke patients. Phys Ther. 1985;65(2):175–180.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuys SS, Bew PG, Lynch MR, et al. Activity limitations experienced by people with stroke who receive inpatient rehabilitation: differences between 2001, 2005, and 2011. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(4):741–746.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beebe JA, Lang CE. Active range of motion predicts upper extremity function 3 months after stroke. Stroke. 2009;40(5):1772–1779.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Barber PA, Petoe M, et al. The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain. 2012;135(Pt 8):2527–2535.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stinear CM, Byblow WD, Ackerley SJ, et al. PREP2: a biomarker-based algorithm for predicting upper limb function after stroke. Ann Clin Transl Neurol. 2017;4(11):811–820.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cortes JC, Goldsmith J, Harran MD, et al. A short and distinct time window for recovery of arm motor control early after stroke revealed with a global measure of trajectory kinematics. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2017;31(6):552–560.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nijland RHM, van Wegen EEH, Harmeling-van der Wel BC, et al. Presence of finger extension and shoulder abduction within 72 hours after stroke predicts functional recovery: early prediction of functional outcome after stroke: the EPOS cohort study. Stroke. 2010;41(4):745–750.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Macdonald JR, Reisman DS, et al. Observation of amounts of movement practice provided during stroke rehabilitation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2009;90(10):1692–1698.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ, Miller WC, et al. A self-administered Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) improves arm function during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a multi-site randomized controlled trial. Stroke. 2009;40(6):2123–2128.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ada L, Preston E, Langhammer B, et al. Profile of upper limb recovery and development of secondary impairments in patients after stroke with a disabled upper limb: An observational study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2018;11:1–7.
   Google Scholar