Simplified Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, and validity for patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy

References

• Passias PG, Marascalchi BJ, Boniello AJ, et al. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy: national trends in the treatment and peri-operative outcomes over 10years. J Clin Neurosci. 2017;42:75–80.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tracy JA, Bartleson JD. Cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Neurologist. 2010;16(3):176–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vitzthum HE, Dalitz K. Analysis of five specific scores for cervical spondylogenic myelopathy. Eur Spine J. 2007;16(12):2096–2103.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire: part 3. Determination of reliability. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(4):321–216.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. JOA Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire (JOABPEQ)/JOA Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). The report on the development of revised versions. J Orthop Sci. 2009;14(3):348–365.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. An outcome measure for patients with cervical myelopathy: Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 1. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(3):227–240.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 2. Endorsement of the alternative item. J Orthop Sci. 2007;12(3):241–248.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wada E, Fukui M, Takahashi K, et al. Japanese orthopaedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire (JOACMEQ): part 5. Determination of responsiveness. J Orthop Sci. 2019;24(1):57–61.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Azimi P, Rezaei O, Montazeri A. An outcome measure of functionality and quality of life in patients with cervical myelopathy. Iran Red Crescent Med J. 2014;16(6):e8102.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Witayakom W, Paholpak P, Jirarattanaphochai K, et al. Validation of the reliability of the Thai version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). J Orthop Sci. 2016;21(2):124–127.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cheung PWH, Wong CKH, Lau ST, et al. Psychometric validation of the adapted traditional Chinese (Hong Kong) version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire (JOACMEQ). Spine. 2018;43(4):E242–E249.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien A, Lai DM, Cheng CH, et al. Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, and validation of a Chinese version of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire. Spine. 2014;39(12):963–970.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chien A, Lai DM, Cheng CH, et al. Responsiveness of the Chinese versions of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation Questionnaire and Neck Disability Index in postoperative patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy. Spine. 2015;40(17):1315–1321.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terwee CB, Bot SD, de Boer MR, et al. Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol. 2007;60(1):34–42.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saltychev M, Mattie R, McCormick Z, et al. Psychometric properties of the neck disability index amongst patients with chronic neck pain using item response theory. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(18):2116–2121.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brazier JE, Harper R, Jones NM, et al. Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire: new outcome measure for primary care. BMJ. 1992;305(6846):160–164.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer D, Stewart AL, Bloch DA, et al. Capturing the patient’s view of change as a clinical outcome measure. JAMA. 1999;282(12):1157–1162.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wu S, Ma C, Mai M, et al. Translation and validation study of Chinese versions of the neck disability index and the neck pain and disability scale. Spine. 2010;35(16):1575–1579.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li L, Wang HM, Shen Y. Chinese SF-36 Health Survey: translation, cultural adaptation, validation, and normalisation. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2003;57(4):259–263.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hancock GR, Mueller RO. The reviewer’s guide to quantitative methods inthe social sciences. New York (NY): Routledge; 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Peterson RA, Kim Y. On the relationship between coefficient alpha and composite reliability. J Appl Psychol. 2013;98(1):194–198.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husted JA, Cook RJ, Farewell VT, et al. Methods for assessing responsiveness: a critical review and recommendations. J Clin Epidemiol. 2000;53(5):459–468.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Knol DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for evaluating the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties: a clarification of its content. BMC Med Res Methodol. 2010;10:22.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, et al. Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess. 1998;2(14):i–iv.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bland JM. Minimal detectable change. Phys Ther Sport. 2009;10(1):39.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nikaido T, Kikuchi S, Yabuki S, et al. Surgical treatment assessment using the Japanese orthopedic association cervical myelopathy evaluation questionnaire in patients with cervical myelopathy: a new outcome measure for cervical myelopathy. Spine. 2009;34(23):2568–2572.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kamper SJ, Maher CG, Mackay G. Global rating of change scales: a review of strengths and weaknesses and considerations for design. J Man Manip Ther. 2009;17(3):163–170.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bellamy N, Muirden KD, Brooks PM, et al. A survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Australia. J Rheumatol. 1999;26(7):1593–1599.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bellamy N, Kaloni S, Pope J, et al. Quantitative rheumatology: a survey of outcome measurement procedures in routine rheumatology outpatient practice in Canada. J Rheumatol. 1998;25(5):852–859.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long AF, Dixon P. Monitoring outcomes in routine practice: defining appropriate measurement criteria. J Eval Clin Pract. 1996;2(1):71–78.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Fritz JM, Irrgang JJ. A comparison of a modified Oswestry Low Back Pain Disability Questionnaire and the Quebec Back Pain Disability Scale. Phys Ther. 2001;81(2):776–788.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar