Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use

References

• Thrift AG, Cadilhac DA, Thayabaranathan T, et al. Global stroke statistics: global stroke statistics. Int J Stroke. 2014;9:6–18.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fleming MK, Newham DJ, Roberts-Lewis SF, et al. Self-perceived utilization of the paretic arm in chronic stroke requires high upper limb functional ability. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:918–924.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lum PS, Mulroy S, Amdur RL, et al. Gains in upper extremity function after stroke via recovery or compensation: potential differential effects on amount of real-world limb use. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:237–253.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, et al. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34:2181–2186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E. Implications of the learned nonuse formulation for measuring rehabilitation outcomes: lessons from constraint-induced movement therapy. Rehabil Psychol. 2005;50:34–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waller SM, Whitall J. Bilateral arm training: why and who benefits? NeuroRehabilitation. 2008;23:29–41.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alberts JL, Wolf SL. The use of kinetics as a marker for manual dexterity after stroke and stroke recovery. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2009;16:223–236.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. An accelerometry-based methodology for assessment of real-world bilateral upper extremity activity. PLoS One. 2014;9:e103135.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen S, Natalio M, Silva A, et al. Reliability of the translation and adaptation of the Test d’Évaluation des Membres Supérieurs des Personnes Âgées (TEMPA) to the Portuguese language and validation for adults with hemiparesis. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2008;12:511–519.
   Google Scholar
• Lemmens RJ, Timmermans AA, Janssen-Potten YJ, et al. Valid and reliable instruments for arm-hand assessment at ICF activity level in persons with hemiplegia: a systematic review. BMC Neurol. 2012;12:21.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Lee JH, Beckerman H, Knol DL, et al. Clinimetric properties of the motor activity log for the assessment of arm use in hemiparetic patients. Stroke. 2004;35:1410–1414.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Uswatte G, Taub E, Morris D, et al. The Motor Activity Log-28: assessing daily use of the hemiparetic arm after stroke. Neurology. 2006;67:1189–1194.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayward KS, Eng JJ, Boyd LA, et al. Exploring the role of accelerometers in the measurement of real world upper-limb use after stroke. Brain Impair. 2016;17:16–33.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kilbreath SL, Heard RC. Frequency of hand use in healthy older persons. Aust J Physiother. 2005;51:119–122.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Demartino AM, Rodrigues LC, Gomes RP, et al. Hand function and type of grasp used by chronic stroke individuals in actual environment. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2019;26:247–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bailey RR, Klaesner JW, Lang CE. Quantifying real-world upper-limb activity in nondisabled adults and adults with chronic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2015;29:969–978.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen ME, Selles RW, Stam HJ, et al. Quantifying nonuse in chronic stroke patients: a study into paretic, nonparetic, and bimanual upper-limb use in daily life. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1975–1981.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haaland KY, Mutha PK, Rinehart JK, et al. Relationship between arm usage and instrumental activities of daily living after unilateral stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012;93:1957–1962.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Pas SC, Verbunt JA, Breukelaar DE, et al. Assessment of arm activity using triaxial accelerometry in patients with a stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:1437–1442.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Predicting daily use of the affected upper extremity 1 year after stroke. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24:274–283.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lourenço RA, Veras RP. Mini-Mental State Examination: psychometric characteristics in elderly outpatients. Rev Saude Publica. 2006;40:712–719.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oldfield RC. The assessment and analysis of handedness: the Edinburgh inventory. Neuropsychologia. 1971;9:97–113.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michaelsen SM, Rocha AS, Knabben RJ, et al. Translation, adaptation and inter-rater reliability of the administration manual for the Fugl-Meyer assessment. Rev Bras Fisioter. 2011;15:80–88.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bohannon RW, Peolsson A, Massy-Westropp N, et al. Reference values for adult grip strength measured with a Jamar dynamometer: a descriptive meta-analysis. Physiotherapy. 2006;92:11–15.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oxford Grice K, Vogel KA, Le V, et al. Adult norms for a commercially available nine hole peg test for finger dexterity. Am J Occup Ther. 2003;57:570–573.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin K, Chuang L, Wu C, et al. Responsiveness and validity of three dexterous function measures in stroke rehabilitation. J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47:563–571.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dannenbaum RM, Michaelsen SM, Desrosiers J, et al. Development and validation of two new sensory tests of the hand for patients with stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2002;16:630–639.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desrosiers J, Hebert R, Dutil E, et al. Validity of the TEMPA: a measurement instrument for upper extremity performance. Occup Ther J Res. 1994;14:267–281.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira ND, Ovando AC, Michaelsen SM, et al. Motor Activity Log-Brazil: reliability and relationships with motor impairments in individuals with chronic stroke. Arq Neuropsiquiatr. 2012;70:196–201.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saliba VA, Magalhães L de C, Faria CDC, de M, et al. Cross-cultural adaptation and analysis of the psychometric properties of the Brazilian version of the Motor Activity Log. Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011;30:262–271.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van der Ploeg HP, Streppel KRM, van der Beek AJ, et al. The Physical Activity Scale for Individuals with Physical Disabilities: test-retest reliability and comparison with an accelerometer. J Phys Act Health. 2007;4:96–100.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Uswatte G, Giuliani C, Winstein C, et al. Validity of accelerometry for monitoring real-world arm activity in patients with subacute stroke: evidence from the extremity constraint-induced therapy evaluation trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2006;87:1340–1345.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munros B. Statistical methods for health care research. 5th ed. Philadelphia (PA): Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Chen H, Lin K, Hsieh Y, et al. A study of predictive validity, responsiveness, and minimal clinically important difference of arm accelerometer in real-world activity of patients with chronic stroke. Clin Rehabil. 2018;32:75–83.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Oliveira MC, Demartino AM, Rodrigues LC, et al. The activity assessment instruments of the upper limbs do contemplate the most accomplished tasks at home by people with hemiparesis? Cad Bras Ter Ocupacional. 2018;26:809–827.
   Google Scholar
• Billinger SA, Arena R, Bernhardt J, Council on Clinical Cardiology, et al. Physical activity and exercise recommendations for stroke survivors: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2014;45:2532–2553.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Connell LA, McMahon NE, Simpson LA, et al. Investigating measures of intensity during a structured upper limb exercise program in stroke rehabilitation: an exploratory study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:2410–2419.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang CE, Bland MD, Bailey RR, et al. Assessment of upper extremity impairment, function, and activity after stroke: foundations for clinical decision making. J Hand Ther. 2013;26:104–115.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rand D, Eng JJ. Disparity between functional recovery and daily use of the upper and lower extremities during subacute stroke rehabilitation. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2012;26:76–84.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuan-Yi L, Keh-Chung L, Tien-Ni W, et al. Ability of three motor measures to predict functional outcomes reported by stroke patients after rehabilitation. NRE. 2012;30:267–275.
   Google Scholar
• Harris JE, Eng JJ. Paretic upper-limb strength best explains arm activity in people with stroke. Phys Ther. 2007;87:88–97.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michielsen M, de Niet M, Ribbers G, et al. Evidence of a logarithmic relationship between motor capacity and actual performance in daily life of the paretic arm following stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41:327–331.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Urbin MA, Waddell KJ, Lang CE. Acceleration metrics are responsive to change in upper extremity function of stroke survivors. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015;96:854–861.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roorda LD, Houwink A, Smits W, et al. Measuring upper limb capacity in poststroke patients: development, fit of the monotone homogeneity model, unidimensionality, fit of the double monotonicity model, differential item functioning, internal consistency, and feasibility of the stroke upper limb capacity scale, SULCS. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011;92:214–227.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar