Advanced search
Publication Cover
Disability and Rehabilitation Volume 44, 2022 - Issue 11
Submit an article Journal homepage
361
Views
3
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Reviews

Quality of reporting of economic evaluations in rehabilitation research: a systematic review

Julie Flemminga School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected]
ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-4290-0344
ORCID Icon,
Dagmara Chojeckib Institute of Health Economics (IHE), Edmonton, AB, Canada;c University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;
,
Lisa Tjosvoldb Institute of Health Economics (IHE), Edmonton, AB, Canada;c University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;ORCID Iconhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-5667-6312
ORCID Icon,
Mike Pauldend School of Public Health, University of Alberta, Edmonton Clinic Health Academy, Edmonton, AB, Canada
&
Susan Armijo-Olivoe Faculty of Business and Social Sciences, University of Applied Sciences, Osnabrück, Germany;f Faculty of Rehabilitation Medicine, Corbett Hall, Department of Physical Therapy, University of Alberta, Edmonton, AB, Canada;g Institute of Health Economics, Edmonton, AB, CanadaCorrespondence[email protected] [email protected]
Pages 2233-2240 | Received 21 Dec 2019, Accepted 27 Sep 2020, Published online: 30 Oct 2020

References

  • Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health. Guidelines for the economic evaluation of health technologies Canada. Ottawa (ON): Canadian Agency for Drugs and Technologies in Health; 2006. p. 1. Online resource (p. vii, 46, A-17).
  • Olsen JA. Principles in health economics and policy. Oxford (UK): Oxford University Press; 2017.
  • Husereau D, Drummond M, Petrou S, et al. Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards (CHEERS) statement. Pharmacoeconomics. 2013;31:361–367.
  • Ocampo W, Cheung A, Baylis B, et al. Economic evaluations of strategies to prevent hospital-acquired pressure injuries. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2017;30:319–333.
  • Green S, Lambert R. A systematic review of health economic evaluations in occupational therapy. Br J Occup Ther. 2017;80:5–19.
  • Zervou FN, et al. Adaptation of cost analysis studies in practice guidelines. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015;94:e2365.
  • Ofman JJ, Sullivan SD, Neumann PJ, et al. Examining the value and quality of health economic analyses: implications of utilizing the QHES. J Manag Care Pharm. 2003;9:53–61.
  • Evers S, Goossens M, de Vet H, et al. Criteria list for assessment of methodological quality of economic evaluations: Consensus on Health Economic Criteria. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2005;21:240–245.
  • Brusco NK, Taylor NF, Watts JJ, et al. Economic evaluation of adult rehabilitation: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials in a variety of settings. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95:94–116.e4.
  • Burge E, et al. Cost-effectiveness of physical therapy only and of usual care for various health conditions: systematic review. Phys Ther. 2016;96:774–786.
  • Gansen FM. Health economic evaluations based on routine data in Germany: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018;18:268.
  • Guerre P, Laaboub N, Colin C, et al. Quality assessment of reporting of economic evaluation in cardiac sugery: has it improved? Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019;35:45–49.
  • Liberati A, Altman DG, Tetzlaff J, et al. The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. J Clin Epidemiol. 2009;62:e1.
  • Soares HP, Daniels S, Kumar A, et al.; Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Bad reporting does not mean bad methods for randomised trials: observational study of randomised controlled trials performed by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. BMJ. 2004;328:22–24.
  • Dechartres A, Trinquart L, Atal I, et al. Evolution of poor reporting and inadequate methods over time in 20 920 randomised controlled trials included in Cochrane reviews: research on research study. BMJ. 2017;357:j2490.
  • Burford BJ, Welch V, Waters E, et al. Testing the PRISMA-Equity 2012 reporting guideline: the perspectives of systematic review authors. PLoS One. 2013;8:e75122.
  • Hopewell S, Keene DJ, Maia Schlüssel M, et al. Clinical and cost-effectiveness of progressive exercise compared with best practice advice, with or without corticosteroid injection, for the treatment of rotator cuff disorders: protocol for a 2x2 factorial randomised controlled trial (the GRASP trial). BMJ Open. 2017;7:e018004.

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Order Reprints Request Corporate Permissions

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

Request Academic Permissions

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.

Related research

People also read lists articles that other readers of this article have read.

Recommended articles lists articles that we recommend and is powered by our AI driven recommendation engine.

Cited by lists all citing articles based on Crossref citations.
Articles with the Crossref icon will open in a new tab.