3,702
Views
9
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Perspectives in Rehabilitation

Work conditions, support, and changing personal priorities are perceived important for return to work and for stay at work after stroke – a qualitative study

, ORCID Icon, , ORCID Icon &
Pages 2500-2506 | Received 06 May 2019, Accepted 10 Oct 2020, Published online: 26 Oct 2020

References

  • Vestling M, Tufvesson B, Iwarsson S. Indicators for return to work after stroke and the importance of work for subjective well-being and life satisfaction. J Rehabil Med. 2003;35(3):127–131.
  • Ghatnekar O, Persson U, Asplund K, et al. Costs for stroke in Sweden 2009 and developments since 1997. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2014;30(2):203–209.
  • Riksstroke the Swedish Stroke Register. Årsrapport stroke TIA 2018. Umeå: Riksstroke the Swedish Stroke Register; 2018 [cited 2020 Jun 24]. Available from: http://www.riksstroke.org/sve/forskning-statistik-och-verksamhetsutveckling/rapporter/arsrapporter/
  • Feigin VL, Forouzanfar MH, Krishnamurthi R, et al. Global and regional burden of stroke during 1990–2010: findings from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2010. Lancet. 2014;383(9913):245–254.
  • Ramirez L, Kim-Tenser MA, Sanossian N, et al. Trends in acute ischemic stroke hospitalizations in the United States. J Am Heart Assoc. 2016;5(5):e003233.
  • Aked J, Delavaran H, Norrving B, et al. Temporal trends of stroke epidemiology in Southern Sweden: a population-based study on stroke incidence and early case-fatality. Neuroepidemiology. 2018;50(3–4):174–182.
  • Treger I, Shames J, Giaquinto S, et al. Return to work in stroke patients. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(17):1397–1403.
  • Kauranen T, Turunen K, Laari S, et al. The severity of cognitive deficits predicts return to work after a first-ever ischaemic stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2013;84(3):316–321.
  • van der Kemp J, Kruithof WJ, Nijboer TCW, et al. Return to work after mild-to-moderate stroke: work satisfaction and predictive factors. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2017;29(4):1–16.
  • Andersen G, Christensen D, Kirkevold M, et al. Post-stroke fatigue and return to work: a 2-year follow-up. Acta Neurol Scand. 2012;125(4):248–253.
  • Cumming TB, Packer M, Kramer SF, et al. The prevalence of fatigue after stroke: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Stroke. 2016;11(9):968–977.
  • International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF). Geneva: WHO; 2001. Available from: https://www.who.int/classifications/icf/en/
  • Lexell J, Brogårdh C. The use of ICF in the neurorehabilitation process. NeuroRehabilitation. 2015;36(1):5–9.
  • Larsen LP, Biering K, Johnsen SP, et al. Self-rated health and return to work after first-time stroke. J Rehabil Med. 2016;48(4):339–345.
  • Edwards JD, Kapoor A, Linkewich E, et al. Return to work after young stroke: a systematic review. Int J Stroke. 2018;13(3):243–256.
  • Palstam A, Törnbom M, Sunnerhagen KS. Experiences of returning to work and maintaining work 7 to 8 years after a stroke: a qualitative interview study in Sweden. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e021182.
  • Lindström B, Röding J, Sundelin G. Positive attitudes and preserved high level of motor performance are important factors for return to work in younger persons after stroke: a national survey. J Rehabil Med. 2009;41(9):714–718.
  • Schwarz B, Claros-Salinas D, Streibelt M. Meta-synthesis of qualitative research on facilitators and barriers of return to work after stroke. J Occup Rehabil. 2018;28(1):28–44.
  • Alaszewski A, Alaszewski H, Potter J, et al. Working after a stroke: survivors' experiences and perceptions of barriers to and facilitators of the return to paid employment. Disabil Rehabil. 2007;29(24):1858–1869.
  • Brannigan C, Galvin R, Walsh ME, et al. Barriers and facilitators associated with return to work after stroke: a qualitative meta-synthesis. Disabil Rehabil. 2017;39(3):211–222.
  • Hellman T, Bergström A, Eriksson G, et al. Return to work after stroke: important aspects shared and contrasted by five stakeholder groups. Work. 2016;55(4):901–911.
  • Westerlind E, Persson HC, Eriksson M, et al. Return to work after stroke: a Swedish nationwide registry-based study. Acta Neurol Scand. 2020;141(1):56–64.
  • Lallukka T, Ervasti J, Lundström E, et al. Trends in diagnosis-specific work disability before and after stroke: a longitudinal population-based study in Sweden. J Am Heart Assoc. 2018;7(1):e006991.
  • Balasooriya-Smeekens C, Bateman A, Mant J, et al. Barriers and facilitators to staying in work after stroke: insight from an online forum. BMJ Open. 2016;6(4):e009974.
  • Trygged S. Return to work and wellbeing after stroke – a success story? Int J Ther Rehabil. 2012;19(8):431–438.
  • Gard G, Pessah-Rasmussen H, Brogårdh C, et al. Need for structured healthcare organization and support for return to work after stroke in Sweden: experiences of stroke survivors. J Rehabil Med. 2019;51(10):741–748.
  • Duncan PW, Wallace D, Lai SM, et al. The stroke impact scale version 2.0. Evaluation of reliability, validity, and sensitivity to change. Stroke. 1999;30(10):2131–2140.
  • Johansson B, Rönnbäck L. Evaluation of the mental fatigue scale and its relation to cognitive and emotional functioning after traumatic brain injury or stroke. Int J Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;2:182.
  • Palm S, Rönnbäck L, Johansson B. Long-term mental fatigue after traumatic brain injury and impact on employment status. J Rehabil Med. 2017;49(3):228–233.
  • Morgan D. Focus groups as qualitative research. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications; 1997.
  • Graneheim UH, Lundman B. Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Educ Today. 2004;24(2):105–112.
  • Tong A, Sainsbury P, Craig J. Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups. Int J Qual Health Care. 2007;19(6):349–357.
  • Gilworth G, Phil M, Cert A, et al. Personal experiences of returning to work following stroke: an exploratory study. Work. 2009;34(1):95–103.
  • Hartke RJ, Trierweiler R. Survey of survivors' perspective on return to work after stroke. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(5):326–334.
  • Öst Nilsson A, Eriksson G, Johansson U, et al. Experiences of the return to work process after stroke while participating in a person-centred rehabilitation programme. Scand J Occup Ther. 2017;24(5):349–356.
  • Donker-Cools B, Schouten MJE, Wind H, et al. Return to work following acquired brain injury: the views of patients and employers. Disabil Rehabil. 2018;40(2):185–191.
  • Wolfenden B, Grace M. Returning to work after stroke: a review. Int J Rehabil Res. 2009;32(2):93–97.
  • Coole C, Radford K, Grant M, et al. Returning to work after stroke: perspectives of employer stakeholders, a qualitative study. J Occup Rehabil. 2013;23(3):406–418.
  • Sinclair E, Radford K, Grant M, et al. Developing stroke-specific vocational rehabilitation: a soft systems analysis of current service provision. Disabil Rehabil. 2014;36(5):409–417.
  • Törnbom K, Hadartz K, Sunnerhagen KS. Self-perceived participation and autonomy at 1-year post stroke: a part of the stroke arm longitudinal study at the University of Gothenburg (SALGOT Study). J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2018;27(4):1115–1122.
  • Culler KH, Wang YC, Byers K, et al. Barriers and facilitators of return to work for individuals with strokes: perspectives of the stroke survivor, vocational specialist, and employer. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2011;18(4):325–340.
  • Elo S, Kyngäs H. The qualitative content analysis process. J Adv Nurs. 2008;62(1):107–115.
  • Saywell N, Taylor D. Focus group insights assist trial design for stroke telerehabilitation: a qualitative study. Physiother Theory Pract. 2015;31(3):160–165.